子宫瘢痕憩室病理学变化与并发症的关系
The Relationship between Pathological Changes and Complications of Caesarean Scar Defect
通讯作者: 孙琳,E-mail:yanan2020217@163.com
△审校者
本文编辑: 王琳
收稿日期: 2022-03-23
| 基金资助: |
|
Corresponding authors: SUN Lin, E-mail:yanan2020217@163.com
Received: 2022-03-23
子宫瘢痕憩室(caesarean scar defect,CSD)是指剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕的肌层缺损,使子宫内膜层向肌层突起,形成凹陷。由于瘢痕处愈合不良形成了异常的解剖学结构,并随着时间的推移而发生了一系列的病理学变化,如纤维组织的增生、迂曲血管的形成、激素受体的分布不均、炎症环境的出现及其他合并症等。CSD的病理学变化往往引起异常阴道出血、继发性不孕、痛经及慢性盆腔痛等并发症,影响女性的生活质量,给有生育要求的患者造成了极大的困扰。因此,CSD的诊治在临床工作中是不容忽视的。分析CSD形成的临床相关因素,探讨发生CSD病理学改变的危险因素,从而进一步明确CSD病理学变化与不同并发症的关系,更好地预防与诊治CSD及其并发症。
关键词:
Caesarean scar defect (CSD) refers to the myometrial defect of the uterine scar after cesarean section, which causes the endometrial layer protrude to the myometrium and form a depression. Abnormal anatomical structures are formed due to poor healing of the scar, and a series of pathological changes have occurred over time, such as proliferation of fibrous tissue, formation of tortuous blood vessels, uneven distribution of hormone receptors, and inflammatory environment and other comorbidities. The pathological changes of CSD often cause complications such as abnormal vaginal bleeding, secondary infertility, dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain, which affect the quality of life of women and cause great distress to patients with fertility requirements. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of CSD cannot be ignored in clinical work. The clinical related factors of CSD formation were analyzed, and the risk factors of CSD pathological changes were explored, so as to further study the relationship between CSD pathological changes and different complications, and better prevent, diagnose and treat CSD and its complications.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
王亚楠, 王琳, 陈亚慧, 董燕, 周燕, 孙琳.
WANG Ya-nan, WANG Lin, CHEN Ya-hui, DONG Yan, ZHOU Yan, SUN Lin.
子宫瘢痕憩室(caesarean scar defect,CSD)又称为子宫瘢痕缺损(previous cesarean scar defect,PCSD),往往表现为月经淋漓不尽、不孕及盆腔痛等。临床医生根据病史结合经阴道超声(transvaginal ultrasound)、磁共振成像及宫腔镜等特征性影像学表现可以诊断CSD。随着我国三孩政策的实施,剖宫产率较以往有所升高,增加了剖宫产术后CSD的发生风险。有研究表明剖宫产术后切口愈合一般分为3个阶段,即炎症免疫反应阶段、肉芽组织和血管增生阶段和组织重塑阶段[1],而CSD是剖宫产术后切口因各种临床相关因素影响而造成瘢痕修复不佳形成的病理改变,且大多数CSD患者会出现不同的并发症,如月经淋漓不净、继发性不孕等[2];其次,当有剖宫产手术史的患者再次妊娠时,由于瘢痕憩室处所发生的病理学变化更易造成子宫破裂、胎盘植入等危险情况[3]。因此,临床医生需了解CSD形成的临床相关因素,认识CSD病理学变化所引起的一系列临床并发症,更加重视CSD的发生与发展。
1 CSD形成的临床相关因素
CSD可分为先天性和后天性,先天性CSD是因为胚胎发育异常造成的宫腔壁局限性缺损,是非常罕见的情况;后天性CSD是剖宫产术后常见的远期并发症之一,大多数为剖宫产术后切口愈合不良形成的。近年来对CSD临床相关影响因素的研究越来越多,认为CSD的形成与以下4个方面有关:①剖宫产年龄与次数。Tang等[4]对183例CSD患者进行研究发现,30岁之前接受剖宫产手术者发生CSD的情况很少,这与Vikhareva Osser等[2]的研究一致,说明最后一次剖宫产年龄是CSD形成的影响因素,年龄越大剖宫产术后发生CSD的概率越高。另有对216例女性的病例对照研究显示,接受多次剖宫产手术的患者发生CSD的风险会增加[5]。多次剖宫产会使子宫峡部反复创伤,尤其2次剖宫产时间间隔短于5年,由于子宫下段肌层组织反复受损使得瘢痕处血液灌注减少,影响切口的正常愈合过程,导致切口愈合不良而发生CSD。此外,多次手术容易使患者发生盆腔粘连,使子宫下段剖宫产瘢痕处向腹壁贴合,形成了向外的牵引力,而子宫有一定的收缩力,以致多次剖宫产患者患CSD的概率增加[6]。②子宫位置。Ofili-Yebovi等[7]分析了63例剖宫产术后出现CSD的患者发现,子宫后倾者的数量是子宫前倾者的2倍多,这是由于子宫长期处于后倾状态,子宫下段有一定程度的张力,拉伸了子宫瘢痕部位,导致子宫瘢痕部位的血流灌注减少,影响剖宫产切口的愈合,从而增加了CSD的发生率。③缝合技术与切口位置。目前,关于剖宫产手术的缝合方法与CSD形成之间的关系存在争议。Di Spiezio Sardo等[8]对9项随机对照试验进行Meta分析发现,与接受双层缝合子宫切口者相比,单层缝合子宫切口者后期随访时超声提示瘢痕部位残余子宫肌层明显更薄,发生CSD的概率更高。残余子宫肌层厚度是CSD形成的影响因素,瘢痕处子宫肌层越薄,发生CSD的概率越高,这是因为不同的残余子宫肌层厚度所接受的血液灌注量不同,从而导致子宫瘢痕愈合程度不同。还有许多研究表明剖宫产切口位置低、接近宫颈内口水平会影响剖宫产瘢痕的愈合,宫颈管分泌的黏液改变了剖宫产术后切口的愈合环境,从而增加了CSD的发生率,但临床工作中很难避免该情况的发生,尤其产妇在足月妊娠分娩时,其宫颈发生扩张导致无法分辨宫颈与子宫下段的情况[9]。④其他。孕妇体质量指数、术后发热、瘢痕体质等临床因素均影响了剖宫产术后子宫切口的愈合,与CSD的形成有一定的关系[10]。
子宫下段剖宫产术后因各种临床相关因素造成切口愈合不良,从而导致CSD的发生。由于憩室处长期受经血、缝合材料等刺激而发生了一定的病理学变化,造成异常子宫出血、继发性不孕、痛经及慢性盆腔痛等不同并发症[11]。可知,临床相关因素的分析可指导临床工作者及早预防与诊治CSD,降低CSD的发生率,为CSD患者选择更好的治疗方法。
2 CSD的病理学改变与异常子宫出血的关系
CSD的常见并发症为异常子宫出血,其症状严重影响了患者的生活质量,一般表现为经期延长、月经淋漓不尽和经间期出血等,近年研究表明CSD患者出现异常子宫出血的概率约为63%[12]。CSD所致异常子宫出血的原因尚不明确,可能与肌层组织改变、内膜血管异常、内膜不同步剥脱及息肉形成有关,该处的病理学改变也决定了CSD的治疗方式。
2.1 CSD肌层组织改变
剖宫产术后子宫切口愈合不良,主要以纤维组织为主,平滑肌显著减少,直接影响瘢痕处的收缩功能,由于瘢痕憩室处肌层薄弱,再次妊娠后也容易发生子宫破裂。Fan等[13]和Donnez[14]的研究表明CSD患者子宫瘢痕憩室处纤维组织增加,肌层密度降低,严重的CSD定义为子宫残余肌层厚度与邻近子宫肌层的厚度比例≤50%,该肌层改变增加了异常子宫出血的概率。另外,Al Naimi等[15]认为瘢痕憩室处子宫残余肌层与邻近肌层可形成活瓣效应,阻碍了经血排出而导致月经淋漓不尽的发生。EL-Toukhy等[16]通过宫腔镜纠正憩室肌层形态,从而减少了经后点滴出血的症状。因此,瘢痕憩室处肌层组织发生改变,不同于正常肌层组织,该处肌层薄弱,其收缩力差,无法及时压迫止血,导致该处肌层缓慢排出淤积的血液,从而发生点滴阴道出血、经期延长等情况。毛萌等[17]认为针对病理学变化行手术治疗来增加憩室肌层厚度,该方法可有效改善经期延长的症状。可知,及时纠正CSD肌层组织改变,可减少月经淋漓不尽的发生。
2.2 CSD内膜的血管异常改变
2.3 CSD内膜不同步剥脱
目前有研究报道CSD内膜处雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)和孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)表达失衡导致子宫内膜增殖,且与正常内膜周期脱落有所差异。Xin 等[19]通过瘢痕子宫动物模型证明了ER和PR的表达对子宫内膜的再生有重要的作用。由于瘢痕憩室部位的内膜受到持续性的雌激素作用,而该处低孕激素效应无法正常完成CSD内膜的转化,从而造成CSD患者出现异常子宫出血的症状。Ben-Nagi等[3]研究12例患者的瘢痕内膜与宫腔内膜情况发现,CSD内膜ER的表达高于正常子宫内膜组织,而PR的表达低于正常子宫内膜组织,可说明CSD内膜不同步剥脱的原因。He等[20]使用左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释节育系统(levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system,LNG-IUD)与宫腔镜手术治疗经后异常出血的CSD患者,治疗前均刮除了子宫内膜,使得CSD内膜与宫腔内膜在相同的时间段得到调节,结果表明2种方法均可缩短经后点滴出血的时间,但6个月以后使用LNG-IUD的患者效果更好。推测是因为LNG-IUD持续调节了ER和PR在瘢痕憩室内膜中的表达,而有效缓解了经后点滴出血的症状。El-Toukhy 等[16]通过宫腔镜电凝或电切破坏CSD内膜消除了该处内膜的异常激素表达,同时刮除子宫内膜,使得CSD内膜与宫腔内膜同期修复,有利于纠正CSD内膜不同步剥脱的情况。因此,瘢痕憩室部位的子宫内膜与周围的正常内膜不同步剥脱,可引起CSD患者出现经期延长、月经淋漓不尽的症状,故调节或破坏该处内膜,改变该处激素表达情况,尽可能使得CSD内膜与宫腔内膜同步发育,能够改善异常子宫出血症状。
2.4 CSD处合并息肉的发生
3 CSD的病理学改变与继发性不孕的关系
3.1 CSD的宫腔微环境
3.2 CSD的内膜容受性
子宫内膜容受性是胚胎着床时子宫内膜容许囊胚黏附、穿透及植入的一种状态。CSD患者的内膜容受性损伤是影响胚胎着床的主要原因之一,继而影响患者的受孕情况。有研究表明瘢痕憩室带来的炎症环境改变了内膜容受性,干扰了子宫内膜在胚胎植入过程中对类固醇的反应,损害了内膜蜕膜化,从而导致继发性不孕,该处对雌、孕激素的异常反应也是影响胎盘植入的危险因素[26]。越来越多的临床工作者发现CSD所带来的病理学变化影响了患者的受孕,预防和治疗CSD的发生,有利于满足患者的生育需求。
3.3 CSD合并子宫内膜异位症
4 CSD的病理学改变与痛经和慢性盆腔痛的关系
5 结语与展望
剖宫产次数、年龄、子宫位置、缝合方式及切口位置等因素影响了CSD的形成,长期存在的瘢痕憩室因环境的改变发生了相应的病理学变化。由于剖宫产术后瘢痕愈合不良导致CSD的形成,其常见的病理学表现为子宫残余肌层薄弱、内膜激素受体分布失衡及凹陷处存在炎症反应等。由于CSD发生了一定的病理学变化使得CSD患者容易出现异常子宫出血、痛经及不孕等症状,而CSD患者再次受孕易发生异位妊娠、胎盘植入、子宫破裂等异常情况。再者,瘢痕憩室合并息肉、子宫内膜异位症等情况,可增加异常子宫出血、继发性不孕等症状。为减少CSD的发生,临床工作者应严格控制剖宫产指征,降低剖宫产率,避免形成CSD及其各种并发症。此外,尽可能做到早期诊断CSD,从而使患者获得更好的治疗效果,改善患者的生活质量。
参考文献
Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section-The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women
[J].DOI:10.3390/ijerph182211998 URL [本文引用: 2]
Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section
[J].DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x URL [本文引用: 2]
Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium
[J].
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019
PMID:19356756
[本文引用: 2]
To compare endometrial tissue samples from cesarean scar (CS) sites and from the posterior uterine wall to better understand the pathophysiology of implantation into a CS.Endometrial samples were taken from both a CS site and the posterior wall in premenopausal women with CSs, and from the posterior wall in premenopausal women who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVDs) only.In the secretory phase, there were significantly fewer leukocytes at CS sites than in the endometrium of women who had SVDs only (P<0.05). Significant differences in leukocytic infiltration and cell proliferation between the proliferative and secretory phases were only found in women who had SVDs only (P<0.05).Leukocyte recruitment to the endometrium during the secretory phase may be affected by the presence of a CS.
Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging
[J].
DOI:S0301-2115(19)30403-8
PMID:31520876
[本文引用: 1]
To determine the risk factors for development of caesarean scar defect (CSD), compare the efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for CSD assessment, and investigate the association between CSD size and clinical symptoms.One hundred and eighty-nine women with CSD and 378 women without CSD with a history of caesarean section (CS) at the Obsterics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University between January 2008 and February 2016 were enrolled. The potential risk factors for CSD were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. TVS and MRI were performed for CSD measurements, including residual myometrial thickness, and depth, length and width of CSD. Associations between CSD size by TVS/MRI and symptoms were evaluated.CS time ≥85 min, peripartum fever or infection, and retroflexed uterus were risk factors for CSD, and age at last CS < 30 years, intraoperative blood loss <150 ml and double-layer closure were protective factors for CSD. Prolonged menstruation, dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and infertility were the main clinical manifestations. Women with a larger CSD presented with more prolonged menstruation. Compared with TVS, measurements by MRI showed better prediction of the clinical symptoms of CSD.Various factors contribute to the development of CSD. Prevention of peripartum infection, reduction of CS time, reduction of blood loss and more careful uterine closure are needed to decrease the risk of developing CSD. MRI is a reliable method for the diagnosis and measurement of CSD, and can be utilized in clinical practice.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Analysis of risk factors for cesarean scar diverticulum: A STROBE-compliant case-control study
[J].DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000025757 URL [本文引用: 1]
Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development
[J].DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev240 URL [本文引用: 1]
Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors
[J].DOI:10.1002/uog.5200 URL [本文引用: 1]
Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
[J].
DOI:10.1002/uog.17401
PMID:28070914
[本文引用: 1]
There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that the surgical technique for uterine closure following Cesarean delivery influences the healing of the Cesarean scar, but there is still no consensus on the optimal technique. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effect of single- vs double-layer uterine closure on the risk of uterine scar defect.MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception of each database until May 2016. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of single- vs double-layer uterine closure following low transverse Cesarean section on the risk of uterine scar defect were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of uterine scar defects detected on ultrasound. Secondary outcomes were residual myometrial thickness evaluated by ultrasound and the incidence of uterine dehiscence and/or rupture in subsequent pregnancy. Summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD), with 95% CIs. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.Nine RCTs (3969 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall risk of bias of the included trials was low. Statistical heterogeneity within the studies was low, with no inconsistency in the primary and secondary outcomes. Women who received single-layer uterine closure had a similar incidence of uterine scar defects as did women who received double-layer closure (25% vs 43%; RR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.36-1.64); five trials; 350 participants; low quality of evidence). Compared with double-layer uterine closure, women who received single-layer closure had a significantly thinner residual myometrium on ultrasound (MD, -2.19 mm (95% CI, -2.80 to -1.57 mm); four trials; 374 participants; low quality of evidence). No difference was found in the incidence of uterine dehiscence (0.4% vs 0.2%; RR, 1.34 (95% CI, 0.24-4.82); three trials; 3421 participants; low quality of evidence) or uterine rupture (0.1% vs 0.1%; RR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.05-5.53); one trial; 3234 participants; low quality of evidence) in a subsequent pregnancy.Single- and double-layer closure of the uterine incision following Cesarean delivery are associated with a similar incidence of Cesarean scar defects, as well as uterine dehiscence and rupture in a subsequent pregnancy. However, the quality level of summary estimates, as assessed by GRADE, was low, indicating that the true effect may be, or is even likely to be, substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section
[J].
DOI:10.5603/GP.a2017.0034
PMID:28509317
[本文引用: 1]
A growing number of studies suggest that the incomplete healing of the CS scar in the uterus increase the risk of uterine dehiscence or rupture during subsequent pregnancies. Thus, the factors that affect wound healing should be evaluated. We aimed to determine whether the morphology of the CS scar in non-pregnant women after one elective CS was affected by the site of the uterine incision, uterine flexion, maternal age, and fetal birth weight.208 non-pregnant women were invited for participation in the study, but only 101 of them met inclusion criteria. Standardized scar parameters (residual myometrial thickness (RMT), depth (D) and width (W) of the hypoechoic niche) were measured using ultrasonography at least 6 weeks after the CS.Scar defect was detected in 26 of 101 subjects. Women without scar defect had significantly higher RMT values (1.87 vs. 0.87), lower newborn birth weight (3127 g vs. 3295 g), and higher scar location above the internal cervical os (62% vs. 16%), than those with scar defect. Maternal age was significantly correlated with D value (R = 0.40). Uterine retroflexion was significantly correlated with a larger D value (R = 0.63) and a larger D/RMT ratio (R = 0.24).In low-risk women who have undergone one elective CS, several risk factors are associated with development of the scar defect, but only scar location can be modified during surgery. Future research is needed to determine whether a relatively higher incision location in the uterus can ensure optimal healing of the CS scar.
Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.004 URL [本文引用: 1]
A Histopathologic Approach to Uterine Niche: What to Expect and to Report in Hysteroscopy-Resected Isthmocele Specimens
[J].DOI:10.1177/10668969211039415 URL [本文引用: 1]
Association between hysteroscopic findings of previous cesarean delivery scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.020 URL [本文引用: 2]
Transplantation of human amniotic epithelial cells promotes morphological and functional regeneration in a rat uterine scar model
[J].
DOI:10.1186/s13287-021-02260-6
PMID:33762002
[本文引用: 1]
Cesarean scar defect (CSD) is characterized by the presence of fibrotic tissue and decreased muscular density which is induced by cesarean section. Serious CSD may eventually result in infertility or obstetrical complications. Human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) have shown great promise in tissue regeneration. This study aims to investigate whether hAEC transplantation has the therapeutic effects on the rat uterine scar following full-thickness injury.A rat uterine scar model was established by excising the full-thickness uterine wall of about 1.0 cm in length and 1/2-2/3 of the total circumference in width. At day 30 post-surgery, hAECs were transplanted into the uterine scar. At day 30 and 60 post-transplantation, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Masson staining, and IHC staining for vWF, VEGFA, α-SMA, and MMP-8 were performed to evaluate the regeneration of the scarred uterus and the underlying mechanism. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed at day 60 after hAEC transplantation. Finally, hAECs were incubated with hydrogen peroxide to verify the paracrine effect of hAECs.Collagen deposition, thin myometrium, and injured endometrium were observed in the rat uterine scar model. After hAEC transplantation, collagen deposition in the uterine scar decreased, and myometrial and endometrial recovery was facilitated. hAEC transplantation also increased the fetus number implanted within the scarred area. Moreover, we found hAECs promoted angiogenesis via upregulation of VEGFA and decreased collagen deposition by upregulating MMP-8 in the uterine scar. The in vitro studies further demonstrated an increase in the expression level of MMP-8 in hAECs cultured with hydrogen peroxide.These results suggested that hAEC transplantation may be efficacious in the functional repair and collagen degradation of uterine scars, which provides a new therapeutic strategy to CSD.
Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased
[J].
DOI:S0015-0282(20)30083-2
PMID:32228874
[本文引用: 2]
Around 20% of pregnant women undergo cesarean section (CS), and in most regions of the world CS rates continue to grow. There is still no clear definition of what is considered a normal physiologic aspect of a CS scar and what is abnormal. Cesarean scar defects (CSDs) should be suspected in women presenting with spotting, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, or infertility and a history of CS. CSDs can be visualized with the use of hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be contemplated according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and residual myometrium thickness (RMT) measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique if the RMT is <3 mm, in which case repair is essential and can be achieved by only laparoscopic or vaginal approach. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made. Because prevention is better than cure, risk factors should be identified early to ensure appropriate management.Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus
[J].
DOI:10.1007/s00404-021-06074-y
PMID:33891206
[本文引用: 1]
We aim to describe the sonographic uterine anatomy after a cesarean section (CS), test the reproducibility of predefined measurements from the BSUM study, and report the distribution of these measurements.This is a descriptive observational study where 200 women with a history of only one CS were recruited 12-24 months postoperatively. A 5-13 MHz micro-convex transvaginal transducer was used for the acquisition of volumetric datasets for evaluating the CS scars. We defined 15 distinct measurements including the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). RMT ratio was calculated as a percentage of RMT to the assumed pre-cesarean anterior uterine wall thickness. A P value below 0.05 is utilized for significant statistical analysis.Patients were included on average 18.5 months post-cesarean. The uterus was anteflexed in 82.5% and retroflexed in 17.5%. Myometrial defects at the site of CS manifest in two forms, either as a niche or as fibrosis. Patients are classified into four groups: those with isolated niches (45%), combined niches and fibrosis (38.5%), isolated fibrosis (11%), and lacking both (5%). The median RMT ratio for these groups was 63.09, 40.93, 59.84, and 100% with a standard deviation of 16.73, 12.95, 16.59, and 0, respectively. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) remained above 0.9 for all distinct measurements among these groups except for those of RMT, where ICC varied between 0.47 and 0.96. The RMT ratio shows a constant ICC at 0.94 regardless of the group.The post-cesarean uterus is often anteflexed, and a myometrial loss of about 50% is normally expected. The pattern of this loss is in the form of a predominantly sharp-edged and echogenic niche, fibrosis, or a combination of both. The proposed RMT ratio takes these changes into consideration and results in a reproducible quantification. We hypothesize that different adverse outcomes could be attributed to the different scar patterns.
Treatment of post-caesarean niche: the accumulation of evidence
[J].DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14733 URL [本文引用: 3]
基于病理变化创新治疗剖宫产切口瘢痕缺损的新术式
[J].
DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021070105
[本文引用: 2]
目前剖宫产切口瘢痕缺损(cesarean scar defect, CSD)的手术效果不尽人意。郑州大学第一附属医院妇科基于CSD的病理变化,即:剖宫产切口局部肌层连续性中断及形成瘢痕缺损,瘢痕缺损部位内膜继发炎症反应、充血、异形血管、息肉形成等,采用宫腹腔镜联合手术,重建局部缺陷肌层,并处理继发病理变化,不切除任何本就缺陷的肌层,可显著改善异常子宫出血症状,创伤小、恢复快,且术后避孕时间短,推荐为治疗CSD的新的手术方式。
子宫切口瘢痕憩室所致异常子宫出血的临床研究
[J].DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.02.004 [本文引用: 1]
A collagen scaffold loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitates endometrial regeneration and restores fertility
[J].
DOI:S1742-7061(19)30327-7
PMID:31075515
[本文引用: 1]
In women of reproductive age, severe injuries to the endometrium are often accompanied by endometrial scar formation or intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), which can result in infertility or miscarriage. Although many approaches have been used to treat severe IUAs, high recurrence rates and endometrial thinning have limited therapeutic efficiency. In this study, a collagen scaffold (CS) loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) was fabricated and applied for endometrial regeneration. The CS/UC-MSCs promoted human endometrial stromal cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis in vitro through paracrine effects. In a model of endometrial damage, transplantation with the CS/UC-MSCs maintained normal luminal structure, promoted endometrial regeneration and collagen remodeling, induced intrinsic endometrial cell proliferation and epithelium recovery, and enhanced the expression of estrogen receptor α and progesterone receptor. An improved ability of the regenerated endometrium to receive embryos was confirmed. Together, our results indicate that the CS/UC-MSCs promoted endometrial structural reconstruction and functional recovery. Topical administration of the CS/UC-MSCs after trans-cervical resection of adhesions might prevent re-adhesion, promote endometrium regeneration and improve pregnancy outcomes for patients with severe IUAs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Intrauterine adhesions due to severe endometrium injuries happen frequently in clinic and become one of the crucial reasons for women's infertility or miscarriage. Therefore, how to regenerate the damaged endometrium is a big challenge. In this study, a collagen scaffold (CS) loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) was fabricated and applied for endometrium regeneration. Herein, UC-MSCs, known for low immunogenicity and high proliferative potential, exhibit promising potential for endometrium regeneration; and collagen scaffolds provide suitable physical support. It was proved that transplantation with CS/UC-MSCs promoted endometrial regeneration and fertility restoration. It suggested that topical administration of CS/UC-MSCs in uterus could be a promising strategy for patients suffering severe intrauterine adhesion and infertility.Copyright © 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
The effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection compared with Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on postmenstrual spotting in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar: A prospective cohort study
[J].
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.014
PMID:34461384
[本文引用: 1]
To compare the effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection with a Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, 52 mg) on postmenstrual spotting duration in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar.This prospective cohort study was conducted at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. Patients with postmenstrual spotting symptomatic niches were allocated to hysteroscopy group or LNG-IUD group based on the shared medical decision-making approach, and were followed up for 1 year after treatment.The primary outcome was reduced postmenstrual spotting days at 6th month after treatment. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness rate (proportion of patients with spotting days reduced by at least 50% from baseline), menstrual characteristics, menstruation satisfaction, direct medical costs, complications and side effects.78 out of the 82 eligible patients were included, 36 patients in both group finished 1-year follow-up. Reduced spotting days at the 6th month was 7 days in LNG-IUD group, significantly higher than 5 days in hysteroscopy group, P = 0.004; The effectiveness rate increased over time within 1 year after the insertion of LNG-IUD (63.89%, 83.33%, 88.89%, 88.89%, P for trend = 0.006), while no trend change was observed in hysteroscopy group (71.05%, 71.05%, 66.67%, 61.11%, P for trend = 0.77). The mean direct medical costs were 817[785,856] $ in the hysteroscopy group and 243[239,255] $ in the LNG-IUD group (p<0.001). 2 patients removed IUD and 2 patients reported weight gain of more than 5 kg and breast distended pain in LNG-IUD group; 2 patients got pregnant in hysteroscopy group. No serious complications were observed in both groups.LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting from the 6th month onwards than a hysteroscopic niche resection in patients with a symptomatic niche at lower direct costs.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Histologic Findings of Uterine Niches
[J].
DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa080
PMID:32561918
[本文引用: 1]
The disruption or defect of the myometrium in the uterine scar of a cesarean section (CS) has been known by various names, such as uterine niche, isthmocele, deficient uterine scar, scar pouch, or diverticulum. Symptomatology, risk factors for niche development, and available treatment modalities have been recently studied. However, the histologic features of this disease remain unknown.The histologic features of eight uterine niches are thoroughly described and a summary of the most important aspects of the uterine niche literature is provided. Five cases of CS scars without niche formation are comparatively examined.Most uterine niches harbor endocervical mucosa, often cystically dilated and/or an atrophic or disorganized endometrial mucosa of lower uterine segment origin. Regenerative epithelial atypia and fibroblastic stromal reaction are frequent features. No granulomatous reaction, important inflammation, or hemorrhage is seen. CS scars without niche formation do not harbor endocervical mucosa or inclusion cysts, fibroblastic stroma, or regenerative atypia.As more prospective studies of uterine niche development and treatment will be conducted, a detailed pathologic report with the criteria proposed herein can be designed.© American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Clinical Success Rate of Extensive Hysteroscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Excision and Correlation to Histologic Findings
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.001 URL [本文引用: 1]
Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review
[J].
DOI:10.1002/uog.13199
PMID:23996650
[本文引用: 1]
To review systematically the medical literature reporting on the prevalence of a niche at the site of a Cesarean section (CS) scar using various diagnostic methods, on potential risk factors for the development of a niche and on niche-related gynecological symptoms in non-pregnant women.The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched. All types of clinical study reporting on the prevalence, risk factors and/or symptoms of a niche in non-pregnant women with a history of CS were included, apart from case reports and case series.Twenty-one papers were selected for inclusion in the review. A wide range in the prevalence of a niche was found. Using contrast-enhanced sonohysterography in a random population of women with a history of CS, the prevalence was found to vary between 56% and 84%. Nine studies reported on risk factors and each study evaluated different factors, which made it difficult to compare studies. Risk factors could be classified into four categories: those related to closure technique, to development of the lower uterine segment or location of the incision or to wound healing, and miscellaneous factors. Probable risk factors are single-layer myometrium closure, multiple CSs and uterine retroflexion. Six out of eight studies that evaluated niche-related symptoms described an association between the presence of a niche and postmenstrual spotting.The reported prevalence of a niche in non-pregnant women varies depending on the method of detection, the criteria used to define a niche and the study population. Potential risk factors can be categorized into four main categories, which may be useful for future research and meta-analyses. The predominant symptom associated with a niche is postmenstrual spotting.Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Analysis on clinical association of uterine scar diverticulum with subsequent infertility in patients underwent cesarean section
[J].DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000027531 URL [本文引用: 1]
Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study
[J].DOI:10.1186/ s12884-022-04471-y URL [本文引用: 1]
Uterine Scarring Leads to Adverse Pregnant Consequences by Impairing the Endometrium Response to Steroids
[J].DOI:10.1210/endocr/bqaa174 URL [本文引用: 2]
Cesarean scar epithelial defect: an underrecognized defect associated with abnormal uterine bleeding
[J].DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.018 PMID:32335052 [本文引用: 1]
Endometriosis and Isthmocele: Common or Rare?
[J].DOI:10.3390/ jcm11051158 URL [本文引用: 1]
An update on uterine cervix pathologies related to infertility
[J].
DOI:S0015-0282(20)30237-5
PMID:32228872
[本文引用: 1]
Many papers and reviews have described the changes of the cervix during pregnancy, cervical cancer, sexually transmitted infections, and cervicovaginal microbiota. In this Views and Reviews, we focus on some specific topics in relation to the uterine cervix and infertility: early cervical cancer and fertility sparing surgery, cesarean scar defect, cervical incompetence, and cervical müllerian anomalies.Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia
?[J].
DOI:S0015-0282(17)32177-5
PMID:29566849
[本文引用: 2]
Adenomyosis is a commonly diagnosed estrogen-dependent gynecological disorder that causes pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Despite its prevalence and severity of symptoms, its pathogenesis and etiology have not yet been elucidated. The aim of this manuscript is to review the different hypotheses on the origin of adenomyotic lesions and the mechanisms involved in the evolution and progression of the disease. Two main theories have been proposed to explain the origin of adenomyosis. The most common suggests involvement of tissue injury and the repair mechanism and claims that adenomyosis results from invagination of the endometrial basalis into the myometrium. An alternative theory maintains that adenomyotic lesions result from metaplasia of displaced embryonic pluripotent Müllerian remnants or differentiation of adult stem cells. Previous investigations performed in human adenomyotic lesions and corroborated by studies in mice supported the involvement of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in the early stages of progression and spread of adenomyosis. However, studies conducted in a recently developed baboon model indicate that collective cell migration may be implicated in the later events of invasion. This suggests that the invasiveness of this complex uterine disorder is not driven by a single mechanism of migration but by a time-dependent combination of two processes.Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome
[J].DOI:10.1002/jcu.22911 URL [本文引用: 1]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |

