子痫前期预防、预测的现状与关注焦点
The Prevention and Prediction of Pre-Eclampsia: Recent Advances and the Way Forward
Corresponding authors: YANG Mei-lin, E-mail:melin126@126.com
Received: 2024-02-4
子痫前期是导致孕产妇和围产儿死亡的重要原因之一,也影响母婴远期健康问题,是严重威胁母婴生命健康的重大公共卫生问题之一。梳理和分析阿司匹林在预防子痫前期方面的局限性及存在的争议,同时探讨其他药物在子痫前期防治中的作用;总结子痫前期在单胎和双胎妊娠中的预测方案,并着重强调三级医疗管理在子痫前期防治中的重要性。旨在进一步推动子痫前期高质量防治,提升妇幼健康水平。
关键词:
Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and newborn mortality worldwide, impacting long-term health outcomes for both mother and child. We describe and analyze the limitations and controversies related to using aspirin for pre-eclampsia prevention, and explore the involvement of other medications in preventative strategies. Furthermore, this article examines the pre-eclampsia prediction scheme for both singleton and twin pregnancies, emphasizing the importance of tertiary referral systems in the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia, aiming to further promoting high-quality pre-eclampsia prevention and treatment and improve maternal and child health in China.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
吴志韦, 林雪燕, 张雪芹, 杨梅琳.
WU Zhi-wei, LIN Xue-yan, ZHANG Xue-qin, YANG Mei-lin.
全球范围内,子痫前期(pre-eclampsia)的发病率约为2%~8%[1],我国子痫前期的发病率约为4.5%,西北和西南地区发病率更高[2]。据估计,全球每年有400万妇女被诊断为子痫前期,导致超过7万名妇女和50万名婴儿死亡,严重威胁母婴健康[3]。然而,子痫前期对母婴的危害远不止于妊娠阶段,全世界超过3亿妇女和儿童由于之前暴露于子痫前期而面临慢性健康问题[4],包括产妇心血管疾病、猝死、肾脏疾病、糖尿病、抑郁症及新生儿肿瘤、自闭症、注意力缺陷和脑瘫等[5]。我国已将慢性疾病管理上升到国家战略,提出到2030年实现全人群、全生命周期的慢性病健康管理的目标。因此,作为产科医师,不仅需要重视妊娠阶段子痫前期的治疗以降低母婴死亡率,同时应该关注其预防、预测,以减少子痫前期发病。
1 阿司匹林预防子痫前期的局限性
阿司匹林预防子痫前期可以追溯到20世纪70年代。《柳叶刀》杂志在1978年发表的病例报道中,患者既往两次妊娠经历了严重子痫前期和胎儿生长受限,该次妊娠从妊娠22周开始每天服用阿司匹林至32周(600 mg,3次/d),最终于34周分娩1例1 410 g的健康男婴。历经几十年的临床研究,现在全球各地区都逐渐认可阿司匹林对子痫前期的预防作用,并将其写进指南,包括2020年美国妇产科医师学会(American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,ACOG)、2019年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence,NICE)、2021年国际妊娠期高血压研究学会(International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy,ISSHP)、2019年国际妇产科联盟和2020年中华医学会。但是各项指南中,对阿司匹林受众人群、剂量、起始终止时间未达成共识。
1.1 阿司匹林对足月、慢性高血压的子痫前期预防效果不佳
近十年内关于阿司匹林预防子痫前期且样本量大于500以上的临床研究主要有2017年的ASPRE研究[6]和2020年以早产为主要结局的ASPIRIN研究[7]。ASPRE研究采用的是胎儿医学基金会(Fetal Medicine Foundation,FMF)的多变量模型筛选出子痫前期高危患者,再将高危患者随机分组,阿司匹林组从11~14周开始每日口服阿司匹林150 mg至妊娠36周,可使妊娠37周以下子痫前期发生概率降低62%[6]。但其对慢性高血压合并妊娠女性、足月子痫前期的预防效果不佳[8]。ASPIRIN研究的次要结局中,阿司匹林同样可以降低妊娠34周以下妊娠期高血压疾病的发病率,但整体发生率差异无统计学意义[7]。目前,阿司匹林用于预防早发型子痫前期已基本获得临床认可,虽然对足月后子痫前期预防效果差,但早发型子痫前期母婴临床表现更严重,母儿病死率更高,仍然可以肯定其临床应用价值。阿司匹林的作用并非完全阻止子痫前期的发生,而是将子痫前期的发生推迟[9]。
然而,2022年我国的一项大型多中心随机对照试验(APPEC研究)[10]得出了截然不同的结论,该研究子痫前期高风险的定义包括:①至少1个高危因素,即子痫前期、糖尿病(1型或2型)或慢性高血压史;或②至少2个以下中间危险因素,包括肥胖(孕前体质量指数≥28 kg/m2)、高龄产妇(≥35岁)、子痫前期家族史(母亲或/和姐妹)或初产妇。阿司匹林组从妊娠12~20周开始每天服用阿司匹林100 mg至妊娠34周。结果显示,不论针对早产还是足月的子痫前期,阿司匹林均不能降低高风险女性的子痫前期发生。该研究进一步分析受试者特征,发现接近半数的受试者为慢性高血压患者。故并不能急于否定阿司匹林预防早发型子痫前期的作用,更为重要的是该项研究提示了不同受众人群能否获益可能存在差异。此外,该研究也侧面提示了阿司匹林对慢性高血压患者预防效果欠佳,同样的结论也在其他研究中证实[11]。由此可见,并非所有人群都可以从阿司匹林中获益,未来应该更针对子痫前期不同亚型分类进行预防研究,在降低医疗成本的同时实现临床最大获益。
1.2 阿司匹林预防子痫前期剂量、起始时间存在较大争议
关于治疗起始时间,根据胎盘形成的病理生理学表明,胎盘血管内增生性侵犯在妊娠8~10周开始,主要在16~18周进行,因此妊娠8~18周是胎盘发生(placentation)的关键时期。多项研究表明阿司匹林预防子痫前期应在妊娠16周前开始[15-16]。关于是否应在妊娠早期阶段启动阿司匹林预防,一项荟萃分析显示,在小于妊娠11周开始服用低剂量阿司匹林并不能降低子痫前期、妊娠期高血压疾病和胎儿生长受限的发生风险。关于停止治疗时间,目前研究结论差异较大,最常用的停药时间为妊娠36周、子痫前期发病时和分娩发动时[17]。但是也有研究推荐妊娠28周、34周、37周等[18-19]。如前所述,阿司匹林的预防作用侧重于妊娠小于37周甚至小于34周的子痫前期,故此范围内停药都是合理的,但没有研究证实最短持续服用阿司匹林多久,即可下降子痫前期发病率。
此外,不能忽略子痫前期的发病率存在着种族和民族的差异性,以及地区海拔、饮食对子痫前期的影响。我国幅员辽阔,跨经纬度较广,各地区妊娠期高血压疾病发病率不同,针对我国人群的研究也应充分考虑上述可变因素。
2 其他药物及非药物方式预防子痫前期的新突破
探索其他药物预防子痫前期的原理基本都聚焦于改变疾病的病理生理,包括氧化应激、抗血管生成因子、血管紧张素、一氧化氮和促炎途径等。目前两个热门的预防药物是普伐他汀和二甲双胍。他汀类药物在预防心血管疾病方面具有重要作用,动物实验证实普伐他汀可以减少培养细胞(内皮细胞和滋养层细胞)中的可溶性fms样酪氨酸激酶-1(soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1,sFlt-1)水平,并改善子痫前期样综合征小鼠的妊娠结局[20]。效仿阿司匹林预防子痫前期的使用,一项荟萃分析综合了4项随机对照试验证实了普伐他汀妊娠期使用安全性良好,并可以降低早发型子痫前期和早产风险[21]。但4项研究的总样本量只有293例,在获得更大样本的临床数据之前,普伐他汀预防子痫前期的效果仍然待定。虽然目前临床证据并未提示妊娠期使用普伐他汀的不良影响,但其在美国食品药品监督管理局妊娠用药安全分级仍然为X类,我国进行他汀类药物预防子痫前期的临床试验较为困难。
目前二甲双胍妊娠期用药的安全性已在国内外受到认可,其用于子痫前期的基础机制包括促进血管生成、保护内皮细胞、抗炎、抑制氧化应激和滋养细胞保护作用[22]。妊娠期糖代谢异常增加妊娠期高血压疾病发病风险,而二甲双胍对这类人群的子痫前期预防有优势。一项荟萃分析结果显示,在妊娠期糖尿病和2型糖尿病孕妇中,与胰岛素相比,二甲双胍可显著降低产妇体质量1.51 kg(95%CI:-1.90~ -1.12 kg,P<0.001),同时降低了妊娠期高血压疾病发生(RR=0.63,95%CI:0.48~0.82,P=0.000 6)[23]。同时,在多囊卵巢综合征和肥胖孕妇中,二甲双胍可以显著降低孕妇子痫前期发生率[24-25]。
因子痫前期的“多因素-多机制-多通路”综合征性质,其不同亚型发病机制、临床表现具有异质性和复杂性,借鉴中医学的整体观念,营养摄取及运动的非药物方式也被证实可预防子痫前期,非药物干预不受限于子痫前期亚型分类的选择,具有普遍适用性,应在临床广泛推行[26]。有研究表明,每周进行至少140 min的中等强度运动,运动强度要足以提高心率,达到可说话但无法唱歌的程度,可使子痫前期发生风险降低40%,并且对胎儿无不良影响[27]。一项网状Meta分析显示,不论是在妊娠期任何时间开始补钙,不论是否同时补充维生素D,也不论采用大剂量(≥1 g/d)还是小剂量(通常500 mg/d),妊娠期补钙可使子痫前期发生风险降低50%[28]。
3 子痫前期的预测指标
子痫前期是一种异质性极强的综合征,母体及胎儿的临床症状迥异,这为子痫前期的预测带来难度。单胎妊娠子痫前期的预测方案主要有三种:一是根据临床危险因素进行评估,较多采用美国预防医学工作组(United States Preventive Services Task Force,USPSTF)发布的子痫前期风险评估[29]。二是测定sFlt-1/胎盘生长因子(placental growth factor,PlGF)的比值[30]。值得强调的是,不同试剂盒用于检测血管生长因子,其预测子痫前期的截断值不同[31]。在2022年NICE推荐中,也按不同试剂盒的检测方式进行了分类叙述[32]。三是FMF基于贝叶斯理论构建的妊娠早期预测子痫前期的多变量模型[8],该模型纳入了高危因素、平均动脉压、子宫动脉搏动指数(uterine artery pulsatility index,UtA PI)、PlGF水平等参数,在FMF官方网站可免费获取。
以上几种方式各有利弊,临床高危、中危因素评估属于定性评估,虽然使用便捷,但预测效果不佳,且用于指导预防措施仍有不足。例如慢性高血压被归为高危因素之一,而具有这一项高危因素即建议服用阿司匹林预防子痫前期,前文已述阿司匹林在这类人群中预防效果不佳。相比之下,后两种方式都加入了实验室检验,提高了预测准确性。sFlt-1/PlGF比值的优点在于对子痫前期高风险的患者进行动态监测,可用于妊娠中期或晚期,具有较高的短期预测价值以辅助临床决策。FMF的多变量模型可以实现妊娠早期对子痫前期的预测,以利于决定是否采取阿司匹林预防[6],但是该模型利用的多种参数并非常规产检项目,推广至所有孕妇势必增加较多医疗资源的消耗。
近年人工智能广泛应用于医疗健康领域,机器学习算法将为子痫前期预测提供一条新思路。例如,利用医院电子病历中的妊娠期产检数据,发现收缩压、血清尿素氮和肌酐水平、血小板计数、血清钾水平、白细胞计数、血清钙水平和尿蛋白是预测模型中最具影响的变量,其中随机梯度增强模型具有最好的预测性能,准确率和假阳性率分别为97.3%和0.9%,可以有效预测晚发型子痫前期[33]。
4 子痫前期的预防、预测方案
双胎妊娠的子痫前期发病率约为单胎妊娠的2~3倍,由此可见,在双胎妊娠中预防、预测子痫前期的必要性。已有的临床研究提示阿司匹林预防双胎妊娠子痫前期的临床证据不足[34-35]。关于预测,双胎妊娠中sFlt-1/PlGF比值明显高于单胎妊娠,已有研究建立了正常双胎妊娠在不同孕周sFlt-1/PlGF的参考范围[36]。Dröge等[37]建议取用53 pg/mL作为sFlt-1/PlGF诊断子痫前期的界值。Shinohara等[38]则认为,sFlt-1/PlGF比值<22.2 pg/mL可以排除4周内双胎妊娠发生子痫前期。此外,利用FMF多变量模型的原理,一项对769例双胎妊娠孕妇的前瞻性队列研究发现,UtA PI并不能预测早发型或晚发型PE,假阳性率为10%时,对于早发型和晚发型PE的阳性预测值分别为10.2%和12.5%,估计检出率分别为40.7%和22.0%,预测效果不理想[39]。未来研究应更加重视双胎妊娠,并且单绒毛膜性和双绒毛膜性的子痫前期发病率不同,是否通过辅助生殖技术妊娠也将影响其发病率,应对不同双胎类型进行分类探讨[40]。
5 各级医疗机构在子痫前期预防中的职责
近年子痫前期的预防、预测已得到临床医师广泛的认识与应用,但重度子痫前期及其严重并发症仍在各级医院不断发生。疾病的防治离不开临床诊疗技术的提升,也离不开规范、高效的医疗管理体系。根据中国一线、二线城市产科危重症转诊中心的数据分析[41-42],不同转诊时机对重度子痫前期孕妇妊娠结局的影响较大。对于存在子痫前期预警因素后转诊的患者,可以减少早发型子痫前期的发生,延缓重度子痫前期的发生时间,减少重度子痫前期的严重并发症。而诊断重度子痫前期后转诊,甚至出现并发症后转诊,均会使上级医疗中心的临床处置陷于被动。在子痫前期的防治体系中,基层医院应注意提高对高危风险因素和预警信息的认知和筛查,上级转诊中心应提高子痫前期的救治能力。
综上,子痫前期的防治是一项综合性的问题。全球范围内对比1990年,2019年妊娠期高血压疾病的发病人数虽然增加了10.92%,而死亡人数下降了30.05%[1],说明子痫前期的防治工作仍有所突破。临床技术层面上,子痫前期的防控临床实践已突破传统观念的束缚;管理层面上,进一步规范我国高效的三级转诊体系,严格产科质量控制,各级医疗机构各司其职,方能确保母婴安全。
参考文献
Epidemiological trends of maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at the global, regional, and national levels: a population-based study
[J].
Prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
[J].Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are associated with various maternal and fetal adverse outcomes and become an increasingly significant threat to Chinese pregnant women. Yet, the prevalence of HDP in China is not clear. We conducted this meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of HDP and specific subtypes in China. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wangfang, and CMB for studies on prevalence of HDP and specific subtypes, published from 1990 to Jan 21, 2020, without language restrictions. We included all studies reported the prevalence of HDP and specific subtypes in Chinese pregnant women. We excluded qualitative studies, case reports, reviews, conference presentations, and studies only provided abstracts. We using a standard self-developed form to extract information from eligible studies. We did meta-analyses by random-effect models and estimated the pooled prevalence of HDP and specific subtypes. In order to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and subgroup effects, we did and meta-regression and subgroup analyses by pre-specified covariates. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020166001. We initially identified 4179 records, of which 92 studies with 1,377,448 participants were eligible in the final systematic review and meta-analyses. The pooled prevalence (95% CI) of HDP, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, chronic hypertension, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia were 7.30% (6.60%-8.00%), 3.30% (2.90%-3.70%), 4.50% (4.00%-5.00%), 2.00% (1.70%-2.30%), 2.60% (2.10%-3.00%), 0.11% (0.08%-0.15%), 0.60% (0.30%-0.90%), and 0.60% (0.40%-0.80%), respectively. No publication bias was identified, although heterogeneity was high (I statistics: 92.0%-99.3%). High prevalence of HDP and the subtypes frequently reported in Western and Northern China. Pregnant women who were aged 35 years and above had high prevalence of HDP and subtypes; women who were overweight or obese had high prevalence of HDP, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. The prevalence of HDP and the subtypes vary in different areas in China. Given to increasingly prevalent of the risk factors, such as overweight, obesity, and advance maternal age, strategies to prevent and manage HDP need to be improved, especially for women living in Western and Northern China.Copyright © 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222
[J].
Pre-eclampsia
[J].Pre-eclampsia is a life-threatening disease of pregnancy unique to humans and a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women who survive pre-eclampsia have reduced life expectancy, with increased risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while babies from a pre-eclamptic pregnancy have increased risks of preterm birth, perinatal death and neurodevelopmental disability and cardiovascular and metabolic disease later in life. Pre-eclampsia is a complex multisystem disease, diagnosed by sudden-onset hypertension (>20 weeks of gestation) and at least one other associated complication, including proteinuria, maternal organ dysfunction or uteroplacental dysfunction. Pre-eclampsia is found only when a placenta is or was recently present and is classified as preterm (delivery <37 weeks of gestation), term (delivery ≥37 weeks of gestation) and postpartum pre-eclampsia. The maternal syndrome of pre-eclampsia is driven by a dysfunctional placenta, which releases factors into maternal blood causing systemic inflammation and widespread maternal endothelial dysfunction. Available treatments target maternal hypertension and seizures, but the only 'cure' for pre-eclampsia is delivery of the dysfunctional placenta and baby, often prematurely. Despite decades of research, the aetiology of pre-eclampsia, particularly of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia, remains poorly defined. Significant advances have been made in the prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia, which is predicted in early pregnancy through combined screening and is prevented with daily low-dose aspirin, starting before 16 weeks of gestation. By contrast, the prediction of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia is limited and there are no preventive treatments. Future research must investigate the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia, in particular of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia, and evaluate new prognostic tests and treatments in adequately powered clinical trials.© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Pre-eclampsia and long-term health outcomes for mother and infant: an umbrella review
[J].
Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia
[J].
Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm delivery in nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy (ASPIRIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
[J].Preterm birth remains a common cause of neonatal mortality, with a disproportionately high burden in low-income and middle-income countries. Meta-analyses of low-dose aspirin to prevent pre-eclampsia suggest that the incidence of preterm birth might also be decreased, particularly if initiated before 16 weeks of gestation.ASPIRIN was a randomised, multicountry, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin (81 mg daily) initiated between 6 weeks and 0 days of pregnancy, and 13 weeks and 6 days of pregnancy, in nulliparous women with an ultrasound confirming gestational age and a singleton viable pregnancy. Participants were enrolled at seven community sites in six countries (two sites in India and one site each in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by site) to receive aspirin or placebo tablets of identical appearance, via a sequence generated centrally by the data coordinating centre at Research Triangle Institute International (Research Triangle Park, NC, USA). Treatment was masked to research staff, health providers, and patients, and continued until 36 weeks and 7 days of gestation or delivery. The primary outcome of incidence of preterm birth, defined as the number of deliveries before 37 weeks' gestational age, was analysed in randomly assigned women with pregnancy outcomes at or after 20 weeks, according to a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) protocol. Analyses of our binary primary outcome involved a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, and generalised linear models to obtain relative risk (RR) estimates and associated confidence intervals. Serious adverse events were assessed in all women who received at least one dose of drug or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02409680, and the Clinical Trial Registry-India, CTRI/2016/05/006970.From March 23, 2016 to June 30, 2018, 14 361 women were screened for inclusion and 11 976 women aged 14-40 years were randomly assigned to receive low-dose aspirin (5990 women) or placebo (5986 women). 5780 women in the aspirin group and 5764 in the placebo group were evaluable for the primary outcome. Preterm birth before 37 weeks occurred in 668 (11·6%) of the women who took aspirin and 754 (13·1%) of those who took placebo (RR 0·89 [95% CI 0·81 to 0·98], p=0·012). In women taking aspirin, we also observed significant reductions in perinatal mortality (0·86 [0·73-1·00], p=0·048), fetal loss (infant death after 16 weeks' gestation and before 7 days post partum; 0·86 [0·74-1·00], p=0·039), early preterm delivery (<34 weeks; 0·75 [0·61-0·93], p=0·039), and the incidence of women who delivered before 34 weeks with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (0·38 [0·17-0·85], p=0·015). Other adverse maternal and neonatal events were similar between the two groups.In populations of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies from low-income and middle-income countries, low-dose aspirin initiated between 6 weeks and 0 days of gestation and 13 weeks and 6 days of gestation resulted in a reduced incidence of preterm delivery before 37 weeks, and reduced perinatal mortality.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia
[J].It was the aim of this study to develop models for the prediction of preeclampsia (PE) based on maternal characteristics and biophysical markers at 11-13 weeks' gestation in which gestation at the time of delivery for PE is treated as a continuous variable.This was a screening study of singleton pregnancies at 11-13 weeks including 1,426 (2.4%) cases that subsequently developed PE and 57,458 cases that were unaffected by PE. We developed a survival time model for the time of delivery for PE in which Bayes' theorem was used to combine the prior information from maternal characteristics with the uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP), using multiple of the median values.The risk for PE increased with maternal age, weight, Afro-Caribbean and South Asian racial origin, previous pregnancy with PE, conception by in vitro fertilization and a medical history of chronic hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome. In pregnancies with PE, there was an inverse correlation between multiple of the median values of the uterine artery PI and MAP with gestational age at delivery. Screening by maternal characteristics, uterine artery PI and MAP detected 90% of PE cases requiring delivery before 34 weeks and 57% of all PE cases at a fixed false-positive rate of 10%.A new model has been developed for effective first-trimester screening for PE.Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Aspirin delays the development of preeclampsia
[J].
A randomized controlled trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia in women at high risk in China
[J].
Impact of the ACOG guideline regarding low-dose aspirin for prevention of superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension
[J].
Optimal aspirin dosing for preeclampsia prevention
[J].
Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and meta analysis
[J].
A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of 80 versus 160 mg of Aspirin on Midtrimester Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Women with a History of Preeclampsia
[J].To compare the effects of 80 mg and 160 mg of aspirin, initiated in the first trimester of pregnancy, on mid-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) in women with a history of preeclampsia.We performed a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pregnant women with a history of preeclampsia were recruited between 10 and 13 weeks gestation and randomly assigned to take either 80 or 160 mg of aspirin daily at bedtime from randomization to 35 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was mean UtA-PI at 22-24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the rate of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia, stratified as term (≥37 weeks), preterm (<37 weeks), and early-onset (<34 weeks) preeclampsia.A total of 107 participants were randomized, including 41 (38%) with a history of preterm preeclampsia and 16 (15%) with a history of early-onset preeclampsia. We observed no significant difference in mean UtA-PI at 22-24 weeks between the 2 groups (0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.05 vs. 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.07, P = 0.9). The rates of fetal growth restriction (8% vs. 2%; P = 0.20); preeclampsia (12% vs. 15%; P = 0.78), preterm preeclampsia (4% vs. 2%; P = 0.56), and early-onset preeclampsia (0% vs. 2%; P = 0.52) were similar in both groups. No serious adverse events associated with the study treatment were reported.We observed no significant difference in UtA-PI between the two doses of aspirin, but we observed low rates of fetal growth restriction and preterm and early-onset preeclampsia (all less than 5%). The benefits of aspirin for the prevention of preterm preeclampsia is probably not related to the improvement of deep placentation alone.Copyright © 2020 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Aspirin Prophylaxis During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
[J].
Strategies for Prescribing Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
[J].To evaluate the cost effectiveness of various preeclampsia screening and aspirin prophylaxis strategies, including a strategy based on biomarker and ultrasound measures.We designed a decision analysis to compare preeclampsia-related costs and effects of four strategies for aspirin use in pregnancy initiated before 16 weeks of gestation to prevent preeclampsia. The four strategies were: 1) no aspirin use, 2) biomarker and ultrasound measure-predicated use, 3) use based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, and 4) universal aspirin use. Our outcomes were preeclampsia-related costs and number of cases per 100,000 pregnant women. Using a threshold of $90,843 per case of preeclampsia, one-way, two-way, and Monte-Carlo sensitivity analyses incorporating varying probabilities of risk reduction due to aspirin use, aspirin-related side effects, and costs were performed to identify ranges at which costs and risks of aspirin-related complications shifted the preferred strategy.Compared with universal aspirin administration, the use of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines is associated with $8,011,725 higher health care costs and 346 additional cases of preeclampsia per 100,000 pregnant women; biomarker and ultrasound screening is associated with an additional $19,216,551 and 308 additional cases. Similarly, no aspirin use is associated with an increased cost of $18,750,381 and 762 additional cases. Thus, universal aspirin use dominated all three other strategies. In a Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 pregnant women, universal aspirin was the preferred strategy in 91% of simulations. The U.S. Preventive Task Force screen was preferred in 8.5% of simulations, and biomarker and ultrasound screening and no aspirin were preferred in 0% and 0.5% of simulations, respectively.Over a broad range of assumptions, universal aspirin administration is associated with fewer cases of preeclampsia and fewer costs relative to no aspirin administration and aspirin administration based on serum and ultrasound measures or clinical risk factors.
Does low-dose aspirin initiated before 11 weeks′ gestation reduce the rate of preeclampsia?
[J].Preconception or early administration of low-dose aspirin might improve endometrial growth, placental vascularization, and organogenesis. Most studies have evaluated the potential benefit of preconception or early administration of low-dose aspirin in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss, women who have undergone in vitro fertilization, or women with thrombophilia or antiphospholipid syndrome. These women are at an increased risk of placenta-associated complications of pregnancy, including preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-dose aspirin initiated at <11 weeks' gestation on the risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, or any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included preterm delivery at <37 weeks' gestation and fetal growth restriction.We searched in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from 1985 to November 2018. Entry criteria were randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of aspirin administered at <11 weeks' gestation in preventing preeclampsia and/or hypertensive disorders in pregnancy or improving pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage as compared with placebo or no treatment and outcome data available or provided by authors for >85% of the study population. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each study and pooled for global analysis as the effect measure. We assessed statistical heterogeneity in each meta-analysis using the χ statistics, I, and Tau. Heterogeneity was considered substantial if an I was greater than 50% and either the Tau was greater than zero or there was a low P value (<0.10) in the χ test for heterogeneity. Random-effects meta-analysis, weighted by the size of the studies, was performed to produce an overall summary on aspirin effect for each outcome. Sensitivity analysis by sequential omission of each individual study and by fixed-effects model was performed. Publication bias was not assessed because of the small number of included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata release 14.0 (StataCorp).The entry criteria were fulfilled by 8 randomized controlled trials on a combined total of 1426 participants. Low-dose aspirin initiated at <11 weeks' gestation was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the risk of preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.17, P =.115), gestational hypertension (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-1.21; P =.121), and any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.04, P =.067). Early administration of low-dose aspirin reduced the risk of preterm delivery (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.97, P =.040) but had no impact on the risk of fetal growth restriction (relative risk, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-2.07, P =.775). Except for preterm delivery and any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, sensitivity analysis demonstrated similar observations, therefore confirming the robustness of the analysis.The administration of low-dose aspirin at <11 weeks' gestation in women at high risk does not decrease the risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, and fetal growth restriction. However, it might reduce the risk of preterm delivery. Larger randomized controlled trials will be required to substantiate the findings.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Effect of low dose aspirin on maternal outcome in women at risk for developing pregnancy induced hypertension
[J].
Prevention of pre-eclampsia with low dose aspirin in primigravida
[J].
Pravastatin for early-onset pre-eclampsia: a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial
[J].
Pravastatin in preeclampsia: A meta-analysis and systematic review
[J].
Metformin, the aspirin of the 21st century: its role in gestational diabetes mellitus, prevention of preeclampsia and cancer, and the promotion of longevity
[J].
The efficacy and safety of metformin alone or as an add-on therapy to insulin in pregnancy with GDM or T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials
[J].
Effects of metformin on pregnancy outcome, metabolic profile, and sex hormone levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and their offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis
[J].Researches of the efficacy and safety of metformin on long-term pregnancy outcomes remains conflicted. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically investigate the effect of metformin treatment on pregnancy outcome, metabolic profile, and sex hormone characteristics in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and their offspring.The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to July 10, 2021 with the keywords "metformin", "PCOS", and "pregnancy". Randomized controlled studies reported pregnant related outcomes after metformin intervention among PCOS women were included, while abstracts and reviews were excluded. Two authors independently identified trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias with Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 5.0. Random effects models were used to evaluate the pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of pregnancy outcome, metabolic profile, and sex hormone levels.Eighteen studies were included. The majority of trials were in medium methodological quality. In terms of pregnancy complications among women with PCOS, metformin treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR =0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.61), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia (RR =0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.83) and macrosomia (RR =0.26, 95% CI: 0.11-0.64). In terms of offspring, metformin significantly associated with larger head circumference (MD =0.29, 95% CI: 0.13-0.45) and higher long-term body mass index (BMI) measures (MD =0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.56). In terms of metabolic profile and sex hormone characteristics, a significant decrease in homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) scores was found in mothers (MD =-0.32, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.02), whereas a significant increase of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels was detected in offspring (MD =0.33, 95% CI: 0.01-0.65).Although the relative low quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and limited results made it difficult to draw a definite conclusion, our study showed that metformin treatment during pregnancy can reduce the risk of pregnancy complications but may have impacts on increasing SHBG levels and long-term BMI in offspring.2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Metformin for prevention of cesarean delivery and large-for-gestational-age newborns in non-diabetic obese pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial
[J].To evaluate the use of metformin for preventing cesarean deliveries and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) newborn (NB) outcomes in non-diabetic obese pregnant women.This is a randomized clinical trial with obese pregnant women, divided into 2 groups: metformin group and control group, with followed-up prenatal routine. The gestational age of participants was less than or equal to 20 weeks and were monitored throughout entire prenatal period. For outcomes of delivery and LGA newborns, absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI).357 pregnant women were evaluated. From the metformin group (n = 171), 68 (39.8%) subjects underwent cesarean delivery, and 117 (62.9%) subjects from the control group (n = 186) had intercurrence (p < 0.01). As for the mothers' general characteristics, there was significance for marital status (p < 0.01). Maternal-fetal results presented reduced preeclampsia (p < 0,01). Primary prophylactic results presented an ARR of 23.1 times (95% CI: 13.0-33.4) with NNT of 4 (95% CI: 3.0-7.7) and no significant values for LGA NB (p > 0.01). Secondary prophylactic outcomes presented decreased odds ratio for preeclampsia (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.41).The use of metformin reduced cesarean section rates, resulted in a small number of patients to be treated, but it did not reduce LGA NB. Administering a lower dosage of metformin from the early stages to the end of treatment may yield significant results with fewer side effects. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(3):290-7.
Preeclampsia
[J].
Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
[J].
Calcium for pre-eclampsia prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis to guide personalised antenatal care
[J].
Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia and Related Morbidity and Mortality: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
[J].Preeclampsia is one of the most serious health problems that affect pregnant persons. It is a complication in approximately 4% of pregnancies in the US and contributes to both maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia also accounts for 6% of preterm births and 19% of medically indicated preterm births in the US. There are racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of and mortality from preeclampsia. Non-Hispanic Black women are at greater risk for developing preeclampsia than other women and experience higher rates of maternal and infant morbidity and perinatal mortality.To update its 2014 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia.Pregnant persons at high risk for preeclampsia who have no prior adverse effects with or contraindications to low-dose aspirin.The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that there is a substantial net benefit of daily low-dose aspirin use to reduce the risk for preeclampsia, preterm birth, small for gestational age/intrauterine growth restriction, and perinatal mortality in pregnant persons at high risk for preeclampsia.The USPSTF recommends the use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/d) as preventive medication for preeclampsia after 12 weeks of gestation in persons who are at high risk for preeclampsia. (B recommendation).
Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia
[J].
Elecsys® and Kryptor immunoassays for the measurement of sFlt-1 and PlGF to aid preeclampsia diagnosis: are they comparable?
[J].
PlGF-based testing to help diagnose suspected preterm pre-eclampsia. Diagnostics guidance
[EB/OL]. [
Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods
[J].
Prevention of Preeclampsia with Aspirin in Multiple Gestations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
[J].Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of low-dose aspirin in multiple gestations to prevent preeclampsia and small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed through electronic database searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of women with multiple gestations assigned to receive aspirin or placebo or no treatment were included. Outcomes included preeclampsia (mild and severe) and SGA neonates. Relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Result Out of 6,853 citations, 6 RCTS, including 898 pregnancies, were included. We observed a significant reduction in the risk of preeclampsia (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.94) and mild preeclampsia (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82) but not severe preeclampsia (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.61-1.72) with low-dose aspirin. The risk of SGA was not changed (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.80-1.47). The reduction of preeclampsia was not different between women randomized before (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.41-1.81) or after 16 weeks' gestation (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96) (p = 0.50). Conclusion There is low level of evidence supporting the use of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia and SGA neonates in multiple gestations.Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Low-dose aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: A real-world study
[J].
Gestational Age-Specific Reference Ranges for the sFlt-1/PlGF Immunoassay Ratio in Twin Pregnancies
[J].
Maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in twin pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia in comparison with singleton pregnancies
[J].In singleton pregnancies, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), placental growth factor (PlGF) and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio have shown utility as a diagnostic test for pre-eclampsia (PE). The objective of this study was to characterize the maternal serum levels of sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in normal and pre-eclamptic twin pregnancies.In a European multicenter case-control study, 49 women with a twin pregnancy were enrolled, including 31 uneventful and 18 pre-eclamptic pregnancies. sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed. The median sFlt-1 and PlGF serum concentrations and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were compared with those of a singleton cohort, matched for gestational age, with PE (n = 54) and with an uncomplicated pregnancy outcome (n = 238).In twin pregnancies with PE, sFlt-1 levels and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were increased and PlGF levels were decreased as compared with those of twin gestations with an uneventful pregnancy outcome (20 011.50 ± 2330.35 pg/mL vs 4503.00 ± 2012.05 pg/mL (P ≤ 0.001), 164.22 ± 31.35 vs 13.29 ± 319.64 (P ≤ 0.001), and 138.80 ± 20.04 pg/mL vs 403.00 ± 193.10 pg/mL (P ≤ 0.001), respectively). The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio did not differ between twin pregnancies with PE and singleton pregnancies with PE. In twin pregnancies with an uneventful outcome, sFlt-1 levels and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were increased, but no differences in PlGF concentration were found when compared with that of singleton controls. ROC analysis determined 53 as an optimal cut-off of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for diagnosing PE in twin gestations, yielding a sensitivity of 94.4% and a specificity of 74.2%. The cut-off values established for singleton pregnancies, of 33 and 85, led to sensitivities of 100% and 83.3%, and specificities of 67.7% and 80.6%, when used to detect PE in twin pregnancies.Significant differences in the serum marker levels in singleton vs twin pregnancies were detected. Reference ranges of sFlt-1, PlGF and their ratio in singleton pregnancies are therefore not transferable to twin pregnancies.Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a retrospective study
[J].
Screening for preeclampsia in low-risk twin pregnancies at early gestation
[J].
Predictive value of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 to placental growth factor ratio for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
[J].
不同转诊时机对转诊系统内重度子痫前期孕妇妊娠结局的影响
[J].
二线城市三级孕产妇转诊中心重度子痫前期临床特点分析
[J].
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |

