| [1] |
Impey O, Greenwood C, Impey L. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: A cohort study of 100 consecutive attempts[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 231:210-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.036.
pmid: 30412904
|
| [2] |
Cobec IM, Varzaru VB, Kövendy T, et al. External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2022, 58(11):1619. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111619.
|
| [3] |
External Cephalic Version: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 221[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(5):e203-e212. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003837.
|
| [4] |
Ramaiyer MS, Lulseged B, Glynn S, et al. Patient Experiences With Obstetric Counseling on Fetal Malpresentation[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(1):e52683. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52683.
|
| [5] |
Pay A, Hetlebakke A, Glomsrød MP, et al. Use of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term: A national survey of Norwegian birth units[J]. Sex Reprod Healthc, 2022, 33:100751. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100751.
|
| [6] |
Kim GJ. Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2019, 62(6):371-381. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.371.
pmid: 31777732
|
| [7] |
Christodoulou E, Ma J, Collins GS, et al. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2019, 110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004.
pmid: 30763612
|
| [8] |
Meurer WJ, Tolles J. Logistic Regression Diagnostics: Understanding How Well a Model Predicts Outcomes[J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(10):1068-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20441.
pmid: 28291878
|
| [9] |
Yerrabelli RS, Lee C, Palsgaard PK, et al. Prediction Models for Successful External Cephalic Version: An Updated Systematic Review[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2024, 41(S01):e3210-e3240. doi: 10.1055/a-2211-4806.
|
| [10] |
Dahl CM, Zhang Y, Ong JX, et al. A Multivariable Predictive Model for Success of External Cephalic Version[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 138(3):426-433. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004518.
pmid: 34352823
|
| [11] |
Kishkovich TP, Naert MN, Warsame F, et al. External Validation of a Prediction Model for External Cephalic Version Success[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 141(5):964-966. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005149.
pmid: 37023445
|
| [12] |
Yerrabelli RS, Palsgaard PK, Shankarappa P, et al. The Optimal Prediction Model for Successful External Cephalic Version[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2025, 42(6):751-757. doi: 10.1055/a-2419-9146.
|
| [13] |
李欢喜, 陈琼华, 陈怡玲. 外倒转术成功的影响因素和列线图模型构建[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2025, 41(1):60-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2025.1.syfckzz202501015.
|
| [14] |
Velzel J, Schuit E, Vlemmix F, et al. Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for external cephalic version[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 228:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.019.
pmid: 29940417
|
| [15] |
Dong T, Chen X, Zhao B, et al. Development of prediction models for successful external cephalic version and delivery outcome[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 305(1):63-75. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06115-6.
|
| [16] |
Hao Q, Hu Y, Zhang L, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials of Neuraxial, Intravenous, and Inhalational Anesthesia for External Cephalic Version[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 131(6):1800-1811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004795.
|
| [17] |
Londero AP, Xholli A, Massarotti C, et al. Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2023, 308(4):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2.
|
| [18] |
Walsh K, Shah R, Armstrong JK, et al. Comparing traditional modeling approaches versus predictive analytics methods for predicting multiple sclerosis relapse[J]. Mult Scler Relat Disord, 2022, 57:103330. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103330.
|
| [19] |
Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, et al. A guide to machine learning for biologists[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2022, 23(1):40-55. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0.
|
| [20] |
Li M, Su X, Liao W, et al. Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study[J]. Reprod Sci, 2025, 32(9):3062-3073. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0.
pmid: 40797059
|
| [21] |
Hutton EK, Simioni JC, Thabane L. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(8):1012-1020. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13161.
|
| [22] |
吴婉华, 曾带娣, 黄丽珊, 等. 基于人工神经网络的臀位外倒转术疗效预测模型研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(7):776-777. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2021070120.
|
| [23] |
欧宜静, 黄丽珊, 曾带娣, 等. 机器学习算法在预测臀先露外倒转术疗效中的应用研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(6):654-656. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2022060118.
|
| [24] |
Zheng LG, Zhang HL, Chen RX, et al. Scoring system to predict the success rate of external cephalic versions and determine the timing of the procedure[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2021, 25(1):45-55. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24345.
|