国际妇产科学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 247-252 doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20240142

妇科肿瘤研究:综述

子宫内膜癌TCGA分子分型与治疗新进展

吴晓莉, 刘开江,

200000 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院妇科肿瘤科

The TCGA Molecular Classification and New Research Progress in the Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma

WU Xiao-li, LIU Kai-jiang,

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200000, China

通讯作者: 刘开江,E-mail:liukaijiang@263.net

审校者

责任编辑: 王昕

收稿日期: 2024-02-5  

基金资助: 北京医学奖励基金(YXJL-2023-0369-0492)

Corresponding authors: LIU Kai-jiang, E-mail:liukaijiang@263.net

Received: 2024-02-5  

摘要

2013年美国癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)完成了子宫内膜癌(endometrial carcinoma,EC)分子分型,将患者分为POLE(DNA polymerase epsilon)突变型、微卫星不稳定高突变(microsatellite instability-high,MSI-H)型、低拷贝数(copy number low,CN-L)型和高拷贝数(copy number high,CN-H)型,后西方学者改良为更贴合临床应用的ProMisE及Trans-PORTEC分型。POLE突变型患者预后较好,复发率较低,可合理减少患者手术范围,术后降级治疗,当患者合并MSI-H或CN-H时仍归为POLE突变型;MSI-H型患者肿瘤突变负荷高,免疫治疗临床获益显著;CN-L型患者最常见,预后仅次于POLE突变型患者,该类患者为保留生育功能行激素治疗缓解率较高;CN-H型患者预后最差,肿瘤具有侵袭性特征及高复发风险,对于该类患者术后需积极补充治疗,避免治疗不足,此外靶向治疗对CN-H患者疗效较好。TCGA分子分型突破了子宫内膜癌传统病理组织学分型评估预后的局限性,为子宫内膜癌的病理特征、预后及临床诊疗决策提供了全新见解。

关键词: 子宫内膜肿瘤; 分子分型; 预后; 精准治疗; 危险性评估; 肿瘤辅助疗法; 分子靶向治疗; 免疫疗法

Abstract

In 2013, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) research center completed the molecular classification endometrial carcinoma (EC), categorizing patients into POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon) mutation type, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) type, copy number low (CN-L) type, and copy number high (CN-H) type. Subsequently Western scholars refined this into the ProMisE and Trans-PORTEC classification to better suit clinical applications. Patients with POLE mutation EC have excellent prognosis and lower recurrence rate, allowing for a reduction in surgical scope and a deescalation of treatment. Patients with MSI-H or CN-H are still POLE mutant. MSI-H type patients have a high burden of tumor mutations and significant benefits from immunotherapy. CN-L type patients are the most common, with a prognosis second only to POLE mutant patients. These patients have a higher response rate to hormone therapy to preserve fertility. CN-H type patients have the worst prognosis, with invasive features and a high risk of recurrence. For these patients, postoperative supplementary treatment is necessary to avoid inadequate treatment. However, there are some studies have shown that targeted therapy is more effective for CN-H type patients. The TCGA molecular typing of EC has overcome the limitations of traditional pathological and histological classification for evaluating prognosis, providing new insights into the pathological characteristics, prognosis, clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions of EC.

Keywords: Endometrial neoplasms; Molecular typing; Prognosis; Precision therapy; Risk assessment; Neoadjuvant therapy; Molecular targeted therapy; Immunotherapy

PDF (604KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

吴晓莉, 刘开江. 子宫内膜癌TCGA分子分型与治疗新进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 247-252 doi:10.12280/gjfckx.20240142

WU Xiao-li, LIU Kai-jiang. The TCGA Molecular Classification and New Research Progress in the Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(3): 247-252 doi:10.12280/gjfckx.20240142

子宫内膜癌(endometrial carcinoma,EC)是女性生殖系统第二常见的恶性肿瘤,近年来发病率逐渐升高,呈现年轻化趋势,严重威胁女性健康[1]。EC的肿瘤异质性显著,临床上依据其组织形态学进行诊断,但主观性较强,因此仅凭传统组织病理学分型难以准确评估患者预后,导致部分患者治疗不足或过度治疗。随着精准医学的发展,基因检测技术应运而生。2013年美国癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)完成了EC全面分子分型,并发现其在预测患者预后及指导治疗层面明显优于传统病理组织学分型,EC的诊疗进入了新时代。

1 EC的TCGA分子分型

1983年Bokhman[2]提出EC可分为雌激素依赖型(Ⅰ型)和非雌激素依赖型(Ⅱ型)。这种二分类法反映了部分肿瘤特质,可以为EC的治疗及预后评估提供指导方向,但其对患者预后风险分层不够精准,无法为患者提供精准治疗,在临床实践中存在较大局限性。2013年TCGA对373例EC患者进行了高通量测序,并根据体细胞拷贝数变异和肿瘤突变负荷将EC分为POLE(DNA polymerase epsilon)突变型、微卫星不稳定高突变(microsatellite instability-high,MSI-H)型、低拷贝数(copy number low,CN-L)型和高拷贝数(copy number high,CN-H)型,该分类为EC患者提供了更准确的预后信息,进一步指导了EC的精准治疗[3]

1.1 POLE突变型

这一类EC患者表现为POLE基因突变。POLE编码的蛋白是DNA聚合酶ε的催化亚基核酸外切酶区域,而DNA聚合酶主要参与DNA复制和修复,所以当POLE基因突变时,DNA复制时错配的碱基不能被修复,这导致基因突变率升高进而可诱导肿瘤发生[4]。该型约占所有EC的5%~10%,比例最低,主要特点是体细胞具有超高突变负荷率(>100 mut/Mb),多见于年轻且具有高危病理学特征[如高级别深肌层浸润、淋巴脉管间隙浸润(lymphvascular space invasion,LVSI)等]的早期子宫内膜样腺癌患者[4]。POLE突变型患者预后较好,淋巴结转移率低(5.2%),5年无复发生存率(recurrence free survival,RFS)高达98%[4]。然而错误识别POLE非致病性突变将导致部分EC患者治疗不足,研究表明POLE基因致病性突变和非致病性突变5年无进展生存率分别为92.3%和76.2%[5]。目前研究已证实了5个最常见致病性热点突变,包含P286R、V411L、S297F、S459F和A456P,覆盖了95%的POLE致病性突变[6]。2022年欧洲肿瘤内科学会(European Society for Medical Oncology,ESMO)的EC指南指出具有明确致病性突变还包括F367S、L424I、M295R、P436R、M444K和D368Y[6]。约3%~6%的POLE致病性突变患者可同时合并MSI-H或p53突变(p53abn),研究表明MSI-H或p53abn均可作为次要事件发生,预后与POLE突变型相似,分型仍为POLE突变型[7]

1.2 MSI-H型

DNA错配修复(mismatch repair,MMR)基因突变、失活或表观遗传沉默导致MSI-H,错配修复缺陷(mismatch repair deficiency,dMMR)致使体细胞突变,突变积累促使肿瘤发生进展[8]。该型占EC的20%~30%,突变负荷率>10 mut/Mb,临床病理特点与POLE突变型相似,多见于高级别子宫内膜样腺癌,预后却与POLE突变型有显著差异[9]。大多数MSI-H型由MLH1启动子甲基化引起,称为散发型人群,5%~10%的dMMR是由于错配基因MLH1、MSH2、MSH6和PMS2的胚系突变引起。林奇综合征(Lynch syndrome,LS)又称遗传性非息肉性结直肠癌(hereditary non-poiyposis colon cancer,HNPPC),是一种常染色体显性遗传疾病,通常由MLH1、MSH2、MSH6和PMS2胚系基因突变引起,EC是女性LS最常见的肠外肿瘤,现多个指南均推荐采用免疫组织化学方法检测MMR蛋白表达水平作为EC患者是否患有LS的筛查手段[10]

1.3 CH-H型

该型以广泛体细胞拷贝数变异为特征,占所有EC的10%~25%,突变负荷低,表现为侵袭性特征,如高级别EC、深肌层浸润、肿瘤组织直径>2 cm、LVSI或特殊病理类型[3]。该型是提示高复发风险及死亡风险的独立因素,在所有分子亚型中预后最差。

1.4 CN-L型

该型仅有少数体细胞拷贝数变异,是最常见的类型,占所有EC的30%~50%,多见于大部分低级别且无高危因素的子宫内膜样腺癌,主要为微卫星稳定(microsatellite stability,MSS)EC。目前临床上定义除了上述3种分子分型EC患者外均为CH-L型,是分子分型中最常见的类型。该型患者雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)和孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)的阳性率高(分别为92%和83.9%),激素治疗缓解率较高(82.2%),为内分泌治疗的最大获益者[11]。CH-L型患者的预后仅次于POLE突变型,5年RFS为74%[9]

因TCGA分子分型极为复杂和昂贵,临床实践难度较大,2015年Talhouk等[12]应用MMR蛋白免疫组织化学、p53蛋白免疫组织化学代替基因测序、Sanger测序鉴定POLE 9~13号外显子热点突变进行分型,改良为ProMisE分型;2016年Stelloo等[13]结合ProMisE分型进一步提出Trans-PORTEC分型。这2种分型将EC患者分为POLE突变型、dMMR型、无特异分子特征(non-sepcific molecular profile,NSMP)型和p53abn型,这2种分型检测方法简便,临床适用性更高。目前国内临床上分子分型检测结合TCGA分型与ProMisE分型策略,采取ProMisE分型方法,保留TCGA分型判读顺序。

多项研究表明EC的TCGA分子分型较传统病理组织学分型具有更高的预测价值。2020年美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network,NCCN)和世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)指南纳入TCGA分子分型检测,2021年欧洲妇科肿瘤学会(European Society of Gynaecological Oncology,ESGO)/欧洲放射治疗及肿瘤学会(European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, ESTRO)/欧洲病理学学会(European Society of Pathology,ESP)指南结合分子分型对EC患者进行风险分层,实现精准治疗[14]。2023年国际妇产科联盟(International Federation of Gynecology and Obsterics,FIGO)首次对EC分期结合TCGA分子分型进一步指导治疗[15]。当前EC治疗原则以手术为主,放化疗为辅,结合TCGA分子分型后EC治疗正式进入分子时代。

2 分子分型指导手术方案的选择

既往EC风险分层的依据(如肿瘤大小、肌层浸润、LVSI)均需术后病理分期,因此术前无法为手术治疗方案的选择提供指导信息。研究表明EC患者诊断性标本与术后标本TCGA分子分型结果高度一致,这是TCGA分子分型能决定手术范围的前提条件,因此,依据术前标本的TCGA分子分型有望在手术方案的选择上提供前瞻性思路[16]。EC治疗原则以手术治疗为主,基本术式为子宫+双侧附件切除术±盆腔淋巴结清扫术(或前哨淋巴结切除术)±腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术,对于特殊病理类型的EC还需切除大网膜[15]。术前利用诊断性刮宫标本进行分子分型可以优化治疗模式,合理缩小手术范围,例如POLE突变型及NSMP型患者可考虑不进行淋巴结切除,肿瘤深肌层浸润或高级别子宫内膜癌可不进行腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除,但均需进一步临床研究证实。

3 分子分型指导辅助治疗

2021年,ESMO结合分子分型进行EC精准风险分层,并提供术后辅助治疗方案的选择[6]。任何分期的POLE突变型EC患者预后均较好,复发患者治愈率高达75%,2023年FIGO分期POLE突变型Ⅰ和Ⅱ期调整为ⅠAm-POLEmut期,又因其对传统化疗药物及放疗不敏感,因此术后不推荐辅助治疗,对于晚期POLE突变型患者是否可以降级治疗需进一步研究证实[4]。dMMR型患者预后中等,对于初治高危型EC患者术后辅助放疗临床获益并不显著[17]。NSMP型EC患者不改变肿瘤分期及风险分层,其高危型EC患者术后辅助治疗很大程度取决于传统风险分层,后装放射治疗是治疗NSMP型EC的首选方法,且并发症发生率显著低于外照射治疗者[17]。p53abn型Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期EC患者调整为ⅡCm-p53abn期,外照射治疗(96.9%)较后装放射治疗(64.3%)的5年局部RFS明显提高,因此p53abn型患者首选盆腔放疗[17]。对于高危p53abn型(包括ⅠG3伴有LVSI的子宫内膜样腺癌、ⅠB G3子宫内膜样腺癌、Ⅱ~Ⅲ期子宫内膜样腺癌和非内膜样癌Ⅰ~Ⅲ期)患者术后可从补充化疗中获益,与单纯放疗相比,同步放化疗将5年无进展生存率和总生存率分别提高了22.4%和23.1%,因此对于p53abn型EC患者术后应选择同步放化疗[9,17]。目前多项关于EC分子分型指导治疗的前瞻性研究正在开展中,如全球首个根据分子分型确定辅助治疗方式的研究PORTEC-4a(NCT03469674)试验[18]以及国际多中心试验项目RAINBO(refining adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer based on molecular features)[19]

4 分子分型指导免疫治疗

随着对肿瘤分子靶点研究的深入,免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoints,ICIs)已改变了多种肿瘤的治疗模式,成为恶性肿瘤继手术治疗及放化疗之后第四大疗法。TCGA分子分型中dMMR型EC患者肿瘤突变负荷较高,CD8+和CD4+ T淋巴细胞浸润显著增加,是免疫治疗获益的潜在人群[20]。大量临床研究已证明免疫治疗使晚期及复发性dMMR型EC患者二线治疗临床获益。

KEYNOTE-158是一项关于程序性死亡受体1(programmed death-1,PD-1)单抗(帕博利珠单抗)对dMMR型实体肿瘤疗效分析的临床研究,其中EC患者客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)最高,为57.1%[21]。2023年2月美国食品药品监督管理局基于GARNET试验结果将另一PD-1单抗(多斯塔利单抗)批准用于dMMR型复发性或晚期EC患者[22]。采用帕博利珠单抗联合标准化疗作为晚期EC的一线治疗,可显著改善患者预后,NCCN指南基于以上研究数据,首次推荐将免疫治疗应用于晚期EC的一线治疗[15,22-23]。此外,研究发现散发性EC患者及LS患者对免疫治疗反应也不同,ORR分别为41.7%和83.3%,表明散发性EC患者从免疫治疗中获益有限,因此进一步识别dMMR型EC患者有助于精准制定治疗方案[24]

5 分子分型指导靶向治疗

5.1 HER-2抑制剂

研究发现HER-2过度表达与肿瘤的发生和侵袭有关,最早用于乳腺癌的靶向治疗[25]。据报道90.4%的p53abn型子宫内膜浆液性癌中存在HER-2蛋白过度表达,针对HER-2阳性的靶向药物可明显改善患者预后[26]。一项随机试验发现对HER-2阳性晚期或复发性子宫内膜浆液性癌患者采用标准化疗加用HER-2过表达靶向药物曲妥珠单抗,可显著延长患者的无进展生存期及总生存期[27]。因此,NCCN指南推荐所有浆液性癌及p53abn患者均行HER-2免疫组织化学检测[15]

5.2 多腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶[poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase,PARP]抑制剂

PARP抑制剂是一类靶向抑制PARP的抗肿瘤药物,通过阻止修复受损的肿瘤细胞DNA,达到杀灭肿瘤细胞的功效[28]。目前PARP抑制剂主要用于卵巢癌、前列腺癌、胰腺癌和乳腺癌等多种癌症治疗,在EC治疗方面正处于临床试验阶段。研究发现p53abn型EC与乳腺癌相关基因(breast cancer-related gene,BRCA)突变的高级别浆液性卵巢癌体细胞突变谱相似[29],提示PARP抑制剂对p53abn型EC患者可能有一定疗效。

5.3 抗血管生成药物

血管内皮生长因子及其同源受体促进肿瘤血管形成,在子宫内膜恶性肿瘤组织中表达水平明显升高,与肿瘤复发、进展、侵袭和转移有关[30]。抗血管生成药物通过抑制肿瘤血管生成达到治疗作用。研究表明贝伐珠单抗联合标准化疗并不能改善晚期及复发性EC患者的预后,但对p53abn型EC患者疗效较好[30]

6 分子分型指导联合治疗

6.1 免疫治疗联合抗血管生成药物

dMMR型EC患者能从免疫治疗中获益,但临床上仅有16%~31%的EC患者为dMMR型,因此有学者提出将免疫联合靶向治疗应用于EC患者[31]。研究表明仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗对既往系统治疗后出现疾病进展的晚期EC患者有较好的抗肿瘤活性[31]。NCCN指南推荐复发、转移和晚期错配修复正常(mismatch repair proficient,pMMR)EC患者采用仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗,dMMR型EC患者采用单药ICIs治疗[15]

6.2 免疫治疗联合PARP抑制剂

虽然ICIs可以改善EC患者的无进展生存期,但获益主要见于dMMR型患者。免疫治疗联合PARP抑制剂治疗已成为多种恶性肿瘤治疗的研究热点。DUO-E研究评估了度伐利尤单抗[程序性死亡受体配体1(programmed death-ligand 1,PD-L1)单抗]+PARP抑制剂对于晚期或复发性EC患者的疗效,发现度伐利尤单抗单药组和度伐利尤单抗+奥拉帕利组中位无进展生存期均明显延长,首次证实免疫治疗联合PARP抑制剂的治疗潜力[32]

6.3 内分泌治疗联合靶向治疗

内分泌治疗可作为既往化疗失败患者的次要选择,或作为无法耐受化疗、低级别肿瘤及肿瘤进展缓慢患者的一线治疗[15]。研究表明单用内分泌治疗效果较差,5年复发风险明显增加[33],因此开发内分泌治疗新策略成为研究热点。80%的子宫内膜样腺癌患者发生磷脂酰肌醇3激酶(phosphoinositide 3-kinase,PI3K)和受体酪氨酸激酶(receptor tyrosine kinae,RTK)/RAS/β-连环蛋白(β-catenin)信号通路改变,并最终通过激活细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4(cyclin-dependent kinase 4,CDK4)和CDK6导致激素治疗耐药,CDK4/6抑制剂作为一种新型蛋白激酶抑制剂,与内分泌治疗产生协同作用[34]。研究表明来曲唑联合CDK4/6抑制剂治疗复发性ER阳性EC患者具有较好的临床获益,ORR为30%,无进展生存期为9.1个月,同时观察到来曲唑联合阿贝西利在NSMP型患者中获益显著,对p53abn型患者无明显缓解[35]。NCCN指南推荐复发性转移性ER阳性EC患者进行内分泌联合CDK4/6抑制剂治疗[15]

7 分子分型指导保留生育功能治疗

部分有生育需求的早期EC患者无法进行手术,需要孕激素治疗,但临床上保留生育功能治疗的指征严格。TCGA分子分型虽未能纳入EC患者保留生育功能的标准,但国内外已有研究报道了TCGA分子分型指导EC患者保留生育功能治疗的临床应用。韩国Chung等[11]对57例为保留生育功能行激素治疗的EC患者进行分子分型,NSMP型患者的ORR显著高于dMMR型患者(82.2% vs. 44.0%,P=0.018)。提示dMMR型患者对激素治疗反应更差,可能与患者ER、PR表达阳性率低有关。POLE突变型因在保留生育功能治疗患者中占比极低,对于内分泌治疗的敏感性还需进一步研究证明。p53abn型患者病情进展迅速,预后极差,不适合保留生育功能。由此可见,在保留生育功能之前进行TCGA分子分型是必要的,对于POLE型及NSMP型早期患者可鼓励保留生育功能治疗,应避免dMMR型及p53abn型患者进入保留生育功能流程。

8 结语与展望

EC在组织学、遗传学、分子学上均表现出高度异质性且预后较差,因此通过TCGA分子分型实现精准治疗至关重要。目前依据TCGA分子分型预测EC患者预后及指导临床治疗已初步显示出良好的应用前景,基于分子分型及突变基因的免疫、靶向以及内分泌治疗均已取得较大临床获益。而最新NCCN的EC指南仍未采用2023版FIGO新分期,术后治疗推荐仍按2009版FIGO分期[25]。国内相关研究也仍处于起步阶段,未来还需要大量临床试验积累探究TCGA分子分型对EC术后辅助治疗决策的影响,避免对患者造成治疗过度或降级治疗,使患者实现最大获益。

参考文献

Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al.

Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants

[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2022, 135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.

[本文引用: 1]

Bokhman JV.

Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma

[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1983, 15(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7.

PMID:6822361      [本文引用: 1]

The author presents a hypothesis that the complex of endocrine and metabolic disturbances arising long before the development of endometrial carcinoma determines the biological peculiarities of the tumor, its clinical course, and the prognosis of the disease. On the basis of a prospective study of 366 patients with endometrial carcinoma, the author postulates that there are two different pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. The first pathogenetic type of the disease arises in women with obesity, hyperlipidemia, and signs of hyperestrogenism: anovulatory uterine bleeding, infertility, late onset of the menopause, and hyperplasia of the stroma of the ovaries and endometrium. The second pathogenetic type of the disease arises in women who have no signs stated above or these signs are not clearly defined. The frequency of the first pathogenetic type in the studied group of women was 65%, whereas the frequency of the second type was 35%. The peculiarities outlined above which are characteristic of the first pathogenetic type of the disease determine the development of highly and moderately differentiated tumors (82.3% G1 and G2), superficial invasion of the myometrium (69.4%), high sensitivity to progestogens (80.2%), and favorable prognosis (85.6% 5-year survival rate). In patients who have the second pathogenetic type of endometrial cancer when endocrine and metabolic disturbances are absent or occult, poorly differentiated tumors arise (62.5% G3), a tendency to deep invasion of tumor into the myometrium is observed (65.7%); high frequency of metastatic spread into the pelvic lymph nodes (27.8%); decrease of sensitivity to progestogens (42.5%); and doubtful prognosis (58.8% 5-year survival rate) are noted.

Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al.

Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma

[J]. Nature, 2013, 497(7447):67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113.

[本文引用: 2]

McAlpine JN, Chiu DS, Nout RA, et al.

Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta-analysis

[J]. Cancer, 2021, 127(14):2409-2422. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33516.

PMID:33793971      [本文引用: 4]

Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE-mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment.A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one-stage meta-analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC).Three hundred fifty-nine women with POLE-mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-7.58; log-rank P <.01). Except for stage (P <.01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease-specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5-14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome.Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de-escalating treatment for these patients.Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics. Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE-mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity. Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment.© 2021 American Cancer Society.

León-Castillo A, Britton H, McConechy MK, et al.

Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma

[J]. J Pathol, 2020, 250(3):323-335. doi: 10.1002/path.5372.

[本文引用: 1]

Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, et al.

Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

[J]. Ann Oncol, 2022, 33(9):860-877. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009.

PMID:35690222      [本文引用: 3]

De Vitis LA, Schivardi G, Caruso G, et al.

Clinicopathological characteristics of multiple-classifier endometrial cancers: a cohort study and systematic review

[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2023 Dec 2: ijgc-2023-004864. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004864.

[本文引用: 1]

Taieb J, Svrcek M, Cohen R, et al.

Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer: Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment

[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2022, 175:136-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.020.

PMID:36115290      [本文引用: 1]

Microsatellite unstable (MSI) colorectal cancers (CRCs) are due to DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and occurs in15% of non-metastatic diseases and 5% in the metastatic setting. Nearly 30% of MSI CRCs occur in a context of constitutional mutation of the MMR system (Lynch syndrome). Others are sporadic cancers linked to a hypermethylation of the MLH-1 promoter. The pathogenic alterations of MMR genes lead to the accumulation of frequent somatic mutational events and these tumours arbour a high antigen burden and are highly infiltrated with cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes. Microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MSI/dMMR) status has prognostic and predictive implications in non-metastatic and metastatic CRCs. The prognostic value of MSI status in non-metastatic CRCs has been studied extensively, yet the data are more limited for its predictive value in terms of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. In both cases (metastatic and non-metastatic settings) treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a remarkable effectiveness in the context of MSI/dMMR status. Indeed, recent data from prospective cohorts and randomised trials have shown a dramatical improvement of survival with immunotherapy (programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1]   cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4] blockage) in metastatic or non-metastatic MSI/dMMR CRC. In this review we report and discuss how and for whom to test for the MSI/dMMR phenotype, as well as the prognostic value of this phenotype and the new treatment recommendations options for this unique CRC population. Despite their efficacy, primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are observed in more than 50% MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients and in the future how to identify these patients and to overcome resistance will be an important challenge.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al.

Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy

[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(29):3388-3397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00549.

[本文引用: 3]

Peltomäki P, Nyström M, Mecklin JP, et al.

Lynch Syndrome Genetics and Clinical Implications

[J]. Gastroenterology, 2023, 164(5):783-799. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.058.

[本文引用: 1]

Chung YS, Woo HY, Lee JY, et al.

Mismatch repair status influences response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer

[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(4):370.e1-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.003.

[本文引用: 2]

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, et al.

A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers

[J]. Br J Cancer, 2015, 113(2):299-310. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.190.

[本文引用: 1]

Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM, et al.

Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts

[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2016, 22(16):4215-4224. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2878.

PMID:27006490      [本文引用: 1]

Recommendations for adjuvant treatment for women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma are based on clinicopathologic features. Comprehensive genomic characterization defined four subgroups: p53-mutant, microsatellite instability (MSI), POLE-mutant, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). We aimed to confirm the prognostic capacity of these subgroups in large randomized trial populations, investigate potential other prognostic classifiers, and integrate these into an integrated molecular risk assessment guiding adjuvant therapy.Analysis of MSI, hotspot mutations in 14 genes including POLE, protein expression of p53, ARID1a, β-catenin, L1CAM, PTEN, ER, and PR was undertaken on 947 available early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinomas from the PORTEC-1 and -2 trials, mostly high-intermediate risk (n = 614). Prognostic value was determined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. AUCs of different risk stratification models were compared.Molecular analyses were feasible in >96% of the patients and confirmed the four molecular subgroups: p53-mutant (9%), MSI (26%), POLE-mutant (6%), and NSMP (59%). Integration of prognostic molecular alterations with established clinicopathologic factors resulted in a stronger model with improved risk prognostication. Approximately 15% of high-intermediate risk patients had unfavorable features (substantial lymphovascular space invasion, p53-mutant, and/or >10% L1CAM), 50% favorable features (POLE-mutant, NSMP being microsatellite stable, and CTNNB1 wild-type), and 35% intermediate features (MSI or CTNNB1-mutant).Integrating clinicopathologic and molecular factors improves the risk assessment of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Assessment of this integrated risk profile is feasible in daily practice, and holds promise to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4215-24. ©2016 AACR.©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021, 31(1):12-39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230.

PMID:33397713      [本文引用: 1]

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Abu-Rustum N, Yashar C, Arend R, et al.

Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2023, 21(2):181-209. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0006.

[本文引用: 7]

Kommoss S, McConechy MK, Kommoss F, et al.

Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series

[J]. Ann Oncol, 2018, 29(5):1180-1188. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy058.

PMID:29432521      [本文引用: 1]

We have previously developed and confirmed a pragmatic molecular classifier for endometrial cancers; ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Inspired by the Cancer Genome Atlas, ProMisE identifies four prognostically distinct molecular subtypes and can be applied to diagnostic specimens (biopsy/curettings) enabling earlier informed decision-making. We have strictly adhered to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for the development of genomic biomarkers, and herein present the final validation step of a locked-down classifier before clinical application.We assessed a retrospective cohort of women from the Tübingen University Women's Hospital treated for endometrial carcinoma between 2003 and 2013. Primary outcomes of overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival were evaluated for clinical, pathological, and molecular features.Complete clinical and molecular data were evaluable from 452 women. Patient age ranged from 29 to 93 (median 65) years, and 87.8% cases were endometrioid histotype. Grade distribution included 282 (62.4%) G1, 75 (16.6%) G2, and 95 (21.0%) G3 tumors. 276 (61.1%) patients had stage IA disease, with the remaining stage IB [89 (19.7%)], stage II [26 (5.8%)], and stage III/IV [61 (13.5%)]. ProMisE molecular classification yielded 127 (28.1%) MMR-D, 42 (9.3%) POLE, 55 (12.2%) p53abn, and 228 (50.4%) p53wt. ProMisE was a prognostic marker for progression-free (P = 0.001) and disease-specific (P = 0.03) survival even after adjusting for known risk factors. Concordance between diagnostic and surgical specimens was highly favorable; accuracy 0.91, κ 0.88.We have developed, confirmed, and now validated a pragmatic molecular classification tool (ProMisE) that provides consistent categorization of tumors and identifies four distinct prognostic molecular subtypes. ProMisE can be applied to diagnostic samples and thus could be used to inform surgical procedure(s) and/or need for adjuvant therapy. Based on the IOM guidelines this classifier is now ready for clinical evaluation through prospective clinical trials.

Horeweg N, Nout RA, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, et al.

Molecular Classification Predicts Response to Radiotherapy in the Randomized PORTEC-1 and PORTEC-2 Trials for Early-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer

[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(27):4369-4380. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00062.

[本文引用: 4]

van den Heerik A, Horeweg N, Nout RA, et al.

PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(12):2002-2007. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001929.

PMID:33046573      [本文引用: 1]

Vaginal brachytherapy is currently recommended as adjuvant treatment in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer to maximize local control and has only mild side effects and no or limited impact on quality of life. However, there is still considerable overtreatment and also some undertreatment, which may be reduced by tailoring adjuvant treatment to the patients' risk of recurrence based on molecular tumor characteristics.To compare the rates of vaginal recurrence in women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, treated after surgery with molecular-integrated risk profile-based recommendations for either observation, vaginal brachytherapy or external pelvic beam radiotherapy or with standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Adjuvant treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile provides similar local control and recurrence-free survival as current standard adjuvant brachytherapy in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, while sparing many patients the morbidity of adjuvant treatment and reducing healthcare costs.A multicenter, international phase III randomized trial (2:1) of molecular-integrated risk profile-based adjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (standard arm).Women aged 18 years and over with a histological diagnosis of high-intermediate risk endometrioid endometrial cancer after total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. High-intermediate risk factors are defined as: (i) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (with invasion) and grade 3; (ii) stage IB grade 1 or 2 with age ≥60 and/or lymph-vascular space invasion; (iii) stage IB, grade 3 without lymph-vascular space invasion; or (iv) stage II (microscopic and grade 1).The primary endpoint is vaginal recurrence. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free and overall survival; pelvic and distant recurrence; 5-year vaginal control (including treatment for relapse); adverse events and patient-reported symptoms and quality of life; and endometrial cancer-related healthcare costs.500 eligible and evaluable patients.Estimated date for completing accrual will be late 2021. Estimated date for presentation of (first) results is expected in 2023.The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03469674) and ISRCTN (11659025).© IGCS and ESGO 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

RAINBO Research Consortium.

Refining adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer based on molecular features: the RAINBO clinical trial program

[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2022, 33(1):109-117. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004039.

[本文引用: 1]

Dong D, Lei H, Liu D, et al.

POLE and Mismatch Repair Status, Checkpoint Proteins and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Combination, and Tumor Differentiation: Identify Endometrial Cancers for Immunotherapy

[J]. Front Oncol, 2021,11:640018. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.640018.

[本文引用: 1]

Marabelle A, Le DT, Ascierto PA, et al.

Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase Ⅱ KEYNOTE-158 Study

[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(1):1-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02105.

PMID:31682550      [本文引用: 1]

Genomes of tumors that are deficient in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and harbor hundreds to thousands of somatic mutations that encode potential neoantigens. Such tumors are therefore likely to be immunogenic, triggering upregulation of immune checkpoint proteins. Pembrolizumab, an anti‒programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, has antitumor activity against MSI-H/dMMR cancer. We report data from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated, advanced noncolorectal MSI-H/dMMR cancer.Eligible patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed MSI-H/dMMR advanced noncolorectal cancer who experienced failure with prior therapy received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiologic imaging was performed every 9 weeks for the first year of therapy and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as assessed by independent central radiologic review.Among 233 enrolled patients, 27 tumor types were represented, with endometrial, gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancers being the most common. Median follow up was 13.4 months. Objective response rate was 34.3% (95% CI, 28.3% to 40.8%). Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.9 months) and median overall survival was 23.5 months (95% CI, 13.5 months to not reached). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 151 patients (64.8%). Thirty-four patients (14.6%) had grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events. Grade 5 pneumonia occurred in one patient; there were no other treatment-related fatal adverse events.Our study demonstrates the clinical benefit of anti-programmed death-1 therapy with pembrolizumab among patients with previously treated unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR noncolorectal cancer. Toxicity was consistent with previous experience of pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, et al.

Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(23):2145-2158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216334.

[本文引用: 2]

Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, et al.

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer

[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(23):2159-2170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302312.

[本文引用: 1]

Chow RD, Michaels T, Bellone S, et al.

Distinct Mechanisms of Mismatch-Repair Deficiency Delineate Two Modes of Response to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Endometrial Carcinoma

[J]. Cancer Discov, 2023, 13(2):312-331. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0686.

[本文引用: 1]

Twomey JD, Brahme NN, Zhang B.

Drug-biomarker co-development in oncology-20 years and counting

[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2017, 30:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2017.02.002.

[本文引用: 2]

Ross DS, Devereaux KA, Jin C, et al.

Histopathologic features and molecular genetic landscape of HER2-amplified endometrial carcinomas

[J]. Mod Pathol, 2022, 35(7):962-971. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00997-2.

[本文引用: 1]

Tymon-Rosario J, Siegel ER, Bellone S, et al.

Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu

[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 163(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.033.

PMID:34372971      [本文引用: 1]

Due to previously reported trastuzumab safety concerns and the scant data available in endometrial cancer patients, we sought to assess the safety, tolerability and toxicity profile of trastuzumab in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) that overexpress HER2/neu in our multicenter randomized phase II trial.Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) for 6 cycles ± trastuzumab (T) with the experimental arm continuing to receive single agent trastuzumab maintenance treatment until disease progression/toxicity. Progression-free-survival was the primary endpoint; overall-survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms.There were 28 patients in the C/P arm and 32 patients in the experimental (C/P + T) arm. Fifty-eight patients (97%) experienced 977 treatment-related AEs of which 875 (89.6%) were low-grade (grade 1-2) and 102 (10.4%) were high-grade (grade 3-5). The mean ± standard deviation of AEs per patient was 15.5 ± 16.3 in the C/P arm and 17.0 ± 16.0 in the C/P + T arm. Gastrointestinal AEs were the most common in both arms (n = 155, 15.7%) of which 94.2% were low-grade (n = 146). Importantly, no significant difference between treatment arms was detected in any system-organ class of AE including cardiac AE. Five (17%) of 29 patients who received prolonged trastuzumab maintenance therapy had no sign of cumulative toxicity after an average (range) of 5.1 (4.2-6.3) years.Trastuzumab appears to be safe and has a manageable toxicity profile both when used in combination with chemotherapy and when used for single agent maintenance in patients with HER2/neu positive USC. This safety profile is reassuring given the proven efficacy of trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu positive USC.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Fugger K, Hewitt G, West SC, et al.

Tackling PARP inhibitor resistance

[J]. Trends Cancer, 2021, 7(12):1102-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.08.007.

PMID:34563478      [本文引用: 1]

Homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) tumours, including those harbouring mutations in the BRCA genes, are hypersensitive to treatment with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPis). Despite high response rates, most HRD cancers ultimately develop resistance to PARPi treatment through reversion mutations or genetic/epigenetic alterations to DNA repair pathways. Counteracting these resistance pathways, thereby increasing the potency of PARPi therapy, represents a potential strategy to improve the treatment of HRD cancers. In this review, we discuss recent insights derived from genetic screens that have identified a number of novel genes that can be targeted to improve PARPi treatment of HRD cancers and may provide a means to overcome PARPi resistance.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cherniack AD, Shen H, Walter V, et al.

Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

[J]. Cancer Cell, 2017, 31(3):411-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.010.

PMID:28292439      [本文引用: 1]

We performed genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterizations of uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs). Cohort samples had extensive copy-number alterations and highly recurrent somatic mutations. Frequent mutations were found in TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, FBXW7, and KRAS, similar to endometrioid and serous uterine carcinomas. Transcriptome sequencing identified a strong epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene signature in a subset of cases that was attributable to epigenetic alterations at microRNA promoters. The range of EMT scores in UCS was the largest among all tumor types studied via The Cancer Genome Atlas. UCSs shared proteomic features with gynecologic carcinomas and sarcomas with intermediate EMT features. Multiple somatic mutations and copy-number alterations in genes that are therapeutic targets were identified.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Leslie KK, Filiaci VL, Mallen AR, et al.

Mutated p53 portends improvement in outcomes when bevacizumab is combined with chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology study

[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 161(1):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.025.

PMID:33541735      [本文引用: 2]

Successfully combining targeted agents with chemotherapy is an important future goal for cancer therapy. However, an improvement in patient outcomes requires an enhanced understanding of the tumor biomarkers that predict for drug sensitivity. NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Study GOG-86P was one of the first attempts to combine targeted agents (bevacizumab or temsirolimus) with chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Herein we performed exploratory analyses to examine the relationship between mutations in TP53, the most commonly mutated gene in cancer, with outcomes on GOG-86P.TP53 mutational status was determined and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on GOG-86P.Mutations in TP53 were associated with improved PFS and OS for patients that received bevacizumab as compared to temsirolimus (PFS: HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31, 0.75; OS: HR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.38, 0.98). By contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS between arms for cases with WT TP53.This exploratory study suggests that combining chemotherapy with bevacizumab, but not temsirolimus, may enhance PFS and OS for patients whose tumors harbor mutant p53. These data set the stage for larger clinical studies evaluating the potential of TP53 mutational status as a biomarker to guide choice of treatment for endometrial cancer patients. Clintrials.gov: NCT00977574.Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, et al.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer

[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(5):437-448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108330.

[本文引用: 2]

Westin SN, Moore K, Chon HS, et al.

Durvalumab Plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: The Phase Ⅲ DUO-E Trial

[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(3):283-299. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02132.

[本文引用: 1]

Johnston S, Toi M, O′Shaughnessy J, et al.

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2023, 24(1):77-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00694-5.

[本文引用: 1]

Du Q, Guo X, Wang M, et al.

The application and prospect of CDK4/6 inhibitors in malignant solid tumors

[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2020, 13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00880-8.

[本文引用: 1]

Konstantinopoulos PA, Lee EK, Xiong N, et al.

A Phase Ⅱ, Two-Stage Study of Letrozole and Abemaciclib in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(3):599-608. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00628.

[本文引用: 1]

/

津ICP备05004273
版权所有 © 天津市医学科学技术信息研究所
地址:天津市和平区贵州路94号 邮编:300070 电话:022-23337521 E-mail:fuchanfence@gjfckx.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发