Cervical cancer remains a major public health challenge worldwide, despite being largely preventable through effective interventions. Timely evidence regarding the global landscape of cervical cancer is crucial for measuring the magnitude of inequalities and monitoring progress towards cervical cancer elimination. We aimed to provide an updated overview of the global burden of cervical cancer using the GLOBOCAN 2022 database. Age-standardized rates of incidence and mortality were presented according to countries, 20 United Nations-defined world regions, and four-tier Human Development Index (HDI) levels. The predicted burden of cervical cancer for 2030 was calculated based on global demographic projections. Globally, an estimated 662,301 new cervical cancer cases and 348,874 deaths occurred in 2022. Substantial geographic disparities in cervical cancer burden existed across countries and world regions. Low HDI countries exhibited two times higher incidence rates and five times higher mortality rates, compared to very high HDI countries. For women aged 15-44 years, cervical cancer ranked among the top three most frequent cancers in 149 countries, and among the top three causes of cancer deaths in 154 countries. If 2022 rates remain unchanged, the global burden of cervical cancer was predicted to increase to 760,082 new cases (a 14.8% increase) and 411,035 deaths (a 17.8% increase) by 2030. Our findings highlight the persistent and widening geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in the burden of cervical cancer. There is an urgent need for tailored national strategies to address these inequalities and accelerate progress towards the goal of cervical cancer elimination.© 2025 UICC.

Cervical cancer ranks third in mortality and fourth in incidence among women worldwide as one of the leading causes of death from cancer in females. The main reason behind cervical carcinogenesis is long-term infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, particularly HPV16 and HPV18. This review investigates HPV distribution across the world, along with cervical cancer molecular development mechanisms and current treatment strategies. Epidemiological data show that disease patterns vary significantly between different geographic regions because underdeveloped nations bear a higher disease burden. The molecular mechanisms of oncogenes E6 and E7 disrupt tumor suppressor pathways, while epigenetic modifications through DNA methylation and miRNA dysregulation promote malignant cell transformation. The reduction in HPV infection through prophylactic vaccination has shown promise, yet barriers related to accessibility and coverage still exist. The therapeutic technologies of gene expression inhibitors together with immunotherapies and epigenetic targeting agents show promise but require optimization to achieve specific targeting while minimizing off-target effects. A combined approach that integrates HPV vaccination with early diagnosis and molecular-specific therapies represents the most effective method to manage cervical cancer impact. The future care of patients will require increased translational research along with better immunization programs to drive prevention and therapeutic outcomes.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are double stranded circular DNA viruses that infect cutaneous and mucosal epithelial cells. Almost 99% of cervical cancer has a HPV infection. The early oncoproteins E6 and E7 are important in this cellular transformation process. Epigenetic mechanisms have long been known to result in decisive alterations in DNA, leading to alterations in DNA-protein interactions, alterations in chromatin structure and compaction and significant alterations in gene expression. The enzymes responsible for these epigenetic modifications are DNA methyl transferases (DNMTs), histone acetylases and deacetylases. Epigenetics has an important role in cancer development by modifying the cellular micro environment. In this review, the authors discuss the role of HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 in modulating the epigenetic mechanisms inside the host cell. The oncoproteins induce the expression of DNMTs which lead to aberrant DNA methylations and disruption of the normal epigenetic processes. The E7 oncoprotein may additionally directly bind and induce methyl transferase activity of the enzyme. These modulations lead to altered gene expression levels, particularly the genes involved in apoptosis, cell cycle and cell adhesion. In addition, the present review discusses how epigenetic mechanisms may be targeted for possible therapeutic interventions for HPV mediated cervical cancer.

Approximately 15–20% of human cancers are caused by viruses, including human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Viruses are obligatory intracellular parasites and encode proteins that reprogram the regulatory networks governing host cellular signaling pathways that control recognition by the immune system, proliferation, differentiation, genomic integrity, and cell death. Given that key proteins in these regulatory networks are also subject to mutation in non-virally associated diseases and cancers, the study of oncogenic viruses has also been instrumental to the discovery and analysis of many fundamental cellular processes, including messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing, transcriptional enhancers, oncogenes and tumor suppressors, signal transduction, immune regulation, and cell cycle control. More recently, tumor viruses, in particular HPV, have proven themselves invaluable in the study of the cancer epigenome. Epigenetic silencing or de-silencing of genes can have cellular consequences that are akin to genetic mutations, i.e., the loss and gain of expression of genes that are not usually expressed in a certain cell type and/or genes that have tumor suppressive or oncogenic activities, respectively. Unlike genetic mutations, the reversible nature of epigenetic modifications affords an opportunity of epigenetic therapy for cancer. This review summarizes the current knowledge on epigenetic regulation in HPV-infected cells with a focus on those elements with relevance to carcinogenesis.

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are responsible for almost all cervical cancer cases and a growing number of oropharyngeal and anogenital cancers. The primary HPV oncoproteins, E6 and E7, act together to manipulate multiple cellular pathways that can ultimately result in malignant transformation. This includes the deregulation of several signalling pathways that regulate cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and cell survival. Although multiple functions of HPV E6 and E7 in driving oncogenesis are well known, recent studies have uncovered novel oncogenic functions of the HPV oncoproteins, including the manipulation of emerging mechanisms of cancer development, such as epigenetic modifications, cellular plasticity and genomic instability. This review explores current advances in understanding how the HPV oncoproteins interact with these cellular processes, highlighting potential therapeutic targets in HPV-associated cancers.

Recent next-generation sequencing studies have generated a comprehensive overview of the genomic landscape of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers. This review summarizes these findings to provide insight into the tumor biology of these cancers and potential therapeutic opportunities for HPV-driven malignancies. In addition to the tumorigenic properties of the HPV oncoproteins, integration of HPV DNA into the host genome is suggested to be a driver of the neoplastic process. Integration may confer a growth and survival advantage via enhanced expression of viral oncoproteins, alteration of critical cellular genes, and changes in global promoter methylation and transcription. Alteration of cellular genes may lead to loss of function of tumor suppressor genes, enhanced oncogene expression, loss of function of DNA repair genes, or other vital cellular functions. Recurrent integrations in RAD51B, NR4A2, and TP63, leading to aberrant forms of these proteins, are observed in both HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and cervical carcinoma. Additional genomic alterations, independent of integration events, include recurrent PIK3CA mutations (and aberrations in other members of the PI3K pathway), alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases (primarily FGFR2 and FGFR3 in HPV-positive HNSCC, and ERBB2 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma), and genes in pathways related to squamous cell differentiation and immune responses. A number of the alterations identified are potentially targetable, which may lead to advances in the treatment of HPV-associated cancers.©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Although aberrant methylation of PAX1 is closely associated with cervical cancer (CC), PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) and its role in CC remain to be elucidated. Here, we clarified the biological function of PAX1 in CC. First, PAX1m in ThinPrep cytologic test samples was measured via quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. The results showed that PAX1 promoter methylation levels were significantly increased in CC patients (p < 0.001). We also found that PAX1 promoter methylation levels were positively correlated with tumor purity but negatively correlated with immune‐infiltration via public databases. Then, CRISPR‐based methylation perturbation tools (dCas9‐Tet1) were constructed to further demonstrate that DNA methylation participates in the regulation of PAX1 expression directly. Gain‐ and loss‐of‐function experiments were used to show that PAX1 overexpression restrained proliferation, migration and improved cisplatin sensitivity by interfering with the WNT/TIMELESS axis in CC cells. Additionally, Co‐immunoprecipitation assays further confirmed the interaction between PAX1 and TCF7L2. Taken together, our results suggested that a tumor suppressor role of PAX1 in CC and that CRISPR‐based PAX1 demethylation editing might be a promising therapeutic strategy for CC.

Tight junction (TJ) proteins are essential for mediating interactions between adjacent cells and coordinating cellular and organ responses. Initial investigations into TJ proteins and junctional adhesion molecules (JAM) in cancer suggested a tumor-suppressive role where decreased expression led to increased metastasis. However, recent studies of the JAM family members JAM-A and JAM-C have expanded the roles of these proteins to include protumorigenic functions, including inhibition of apoptosis and promotion of proliferation, cancer stem cell biology, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. JAM function by interacting with other proteins through three distinct molecular mechanisms: direct cell-cell interaction on adjacent cells, stabilization of adjacent cell surface receptors on the same cell, and interactions between JAM and cell surface receptors expressed on adjacent cells. Collectively, these diverse interactions contribute to both the pro- and antitumorigenic functions of JAM. In this review, we discuss these context-dependent functions of JAM in a variety of cancers and highlight key areas that remain poorly understood, including their potentially diverse intracellular signaling networks, their roles in the tumor microenvironment, and the consequences of posttranslational modifications on their function. These studies have implications in furthering our understanding of JAM in cancer and provide a paradigm for exploring additional roles of TJ proteins.©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the leading cause of mortality among women worldwide. Tumor metastasis is an important cause of poor prognosis. Determining the exact mechanisms of metastasis and potential targeted therapies is urgently needed. Junctional adhesion molecule 3 (JAM3) is an important member of the TJ tight junction (TJ) family, and its biological function in cervical cancer needs to be further clarified. We found that JAM3 was highly expressed in cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis and that high expression of JAM3 promoted cervical cancer cell metastasis both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, overexpression of JAM3 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Moreover, silencing JAM3 suppressed cervical cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro. Finally, JAM3 overexpression activated the HIF-1α/VEGFA pathway. In conclusion, our results suggested that JAM3 promotes cervical cancer cell migration and invasion by activating the HIF-1α/VEGFA pathway. JAM3 may be a promising biomarker and effective therapeutic target for cervical cancer.© 2024. The Author(s).

DNA methylation is clinically relevant to important tumorigenic mechanisms. This study evaluated the methylation status of candidate genes in cervical neoplasia and determined their diagnostic performance in clinical practice. Cervical cancer and normal cervix tissue was used to select the top 5 discriminating loci among 27 loci in 4 genes (CCNA1, CADM1, DAPK1, JAM3), and one locus of JAM3 (region M4) was identified and confirmed with 267 and 224 cervical scrapings from 2 independent colposcopy referral studies. For patients with atypical squamous cells of unknown significance and those with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, with JAM3-M4 compared to a triage marker of hrHPV testing, the specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 CIN3 and cancer cases (CIN3+) / no neoplasia and CIN1 (CIN1-) was significantly increased, from 21.88 to 81.82 and 15.38 to 85.18, respectively. The corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was increased from 26.47 to 57.14 and 18.52 to 63.64, respectively. For hrHPV-positive patients, compared to a triage marker of cytology testing, JAM3-M4 showed increased specificity and PPV, from 30.67 to 87.65 and 38.82 to 82.14, respectively. We assessed whether JAM3-M4 could distinguish productive from transforming CIN2; the coincidence rate of JAM3-M4 and P16 was as high as 60.5%.

Optimal triage option for high-risk HPV-positive (hrHPV) women remains uncertain. We aimed to utilize methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme-based quantitative PCR (MSRE-qPCR) technique and develop triple-target human gene methylation panels to improve detection of advanced cervical precancers and cancers (CIN3 +) among hrHPV women.Eighteen candidate genes were detected by MSRE-qPCR in cervical samples from hrHPV women. All possible triple-target panels from these genes were generated by logistic regression models with repeated ten-fold cross-validation on a training set of 1223 women (180 CIN3 +; 1043 < CIN3). Panels with the top two AUCs for CIN3 + on a validation set of 937 women (69 CIN3 +; 868 < CIN3) were ultimately selected for qPCR reconstruction, retesting, and retraining. Triage performance, screening efficiency and risk stratification of the selected panels were then compared with traditional triage strategies (cytology [ASCUS as the threshold, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance], HPV16/18 genotyping, HPV16/18 genotyping combined with cytology [ASCUS]) within the validation set.Two panels were finally identified and validated for CIN3 + detection. Panel 1 includes JAM3, PCDHGB7, and SORCS1; while Panel 2 consists of PAX1, ZNF671, and ASCL1. Compared to traditional triage strategies, both panels demonstrated superior AUCs (Panel 1: 0.799; Panel 2: 0.790; Cytology: 0.532; HPV16/18 genotyping: 0.589; HPV16/18 + Cytology: 0.515; all P< 0.001), with substantially higher specificities (83.06%; 86.98%; 29.49%; 72.93%; 14.52%), comparable sensitivities (76.81%; 71.01%; 76.81%; 44.93%; 88.41%), and requiring fewer colposcopies per CIN3 + case (3.77; 3.31; 12.55; 8.58; 13.16). However, Panel 1 and Panel 2 were statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.603; Ratio: 0.92 [0.76-1.13]; Ratio: 1.05 [1.01-1.08]). Unlike traditional strategies (CIN3 + risks: 5.59% ~ 17.97%), women tested negative on either panel had immediate CIN3 + risks below 3% (Panel 1: 2.17%; Panel 2: 2.58%), supporting safe deferral for at least one year.Two triple-target human gene methylation panels were successfully developed, each integrated into a single MSRE-qPCR system for one-tube detection. Both panels outperformed current triage strategies, indicating their potential as alternatives, though external validation among diverse settings is needed before clinical application.© 2025. The Author(s).

To assess the clinical value of DNA methylation measurement in exfoliated cervical cells for distinguishing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) from other cervical abnormalities.A total of 276 patients were enrolled, and general clinical information was collected. Exfoliated cervical cells were obtained to assess human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, conduct ThinPrep cytology tests (TCT), and measure methylation levels of JAM3 (△CtJ) and PAX1 (△CtP). Logistic regression was performed to identify factors significantly associated with HSIL diagnosis. A conditional inference tree model and the area under the curve (AUC) were employed to evaluate the efficacy of JAM3 and PAX1 methylation in detecting HSIL.Independent risk factors for HSIL diagnosis included △CtJ, △CtP, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and HPV16 infection. The conditional inference tree indicated that 96.4% of patients were non-HSIL when △CtJ > 11.66, and 99.1% were non-HSIL when △CtP > 10.97. The diagnostic performance of △CtJ/△CtP surpassed that of TCT/HPV alone. Among six methods, the combination of △CtP, TCT, and high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) testing achieved the highest sensitivity (91.2%), positive predictive value (50.0%), negative predictive value (98.6%), and AUC (0.932).In women with hr-HPV infection, DNA methylation analysis of cervical cytology outperformed traditional TCT or HPV testing. The combination of △CtP with TCT and HPV may offer the most accurate screening approach for HSIL.© 2024. The Author(s).

DNA methylation analysis of cervical scrapes using FAM19A4 and mir124-2 genes has shown a good clinical performance in detecting cervical cancer and advanced CIN lesions in need of treatment in HPV-positive women. To date, longitudinal data on the cancer risk of methylation test-negative women are lacking. In our study, we assessed the longitudinal outcome of FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation analysis in an HPV-positive screening cohort with 14 years of follow-up. Archived HPV-positive cervical scrapes of 1,040 women (age 29-61 years), who were enrolled in the POBASCAM screening trial (ISRCTN20781131) were tested for FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation. By linkage with the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA), 35 cervical cancers were identified during 14 years of follow-up comprising three screens (baseline, and after 5 and 10 years). The baseline scrape of 36.1% (n = 375) women tested positive for FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation, including 24 women with cervical cancer in follow-up, and 30.6% (n = 318) had abnormal cytology (threshold borderline dyskaryosis or ASCUS), including 14 women with cervical cancer in follow-up. Within screening round capability of FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation to detect cervical cancer was 100% (11/11, 95% CI: 71.5-100). Kaplan-Meier estimate of 14-year cumulative cervical cancer incidence was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.66-3.0) among baseline methylation-negative and 2.4% (95% CI: 1.4-3.6) among baseline cytology-negative women (risk difference: 0.71% [95% CI: 0.16-1.4]). In conclusion, a negative FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation test provides a low cervical cancer risk in HPV-positive women of 30 years and older. FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation testing merits consideration as an objective triage test in HPV-based cervical screening programs.© 2018 The Authors International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.

Referring all women who tested positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 to colposcopy may lead to potential over-referral issues. Triage tests based on cytology results face challenges in achieving accurate diagnoses. Our study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of PAX1/JAM3 methylation (CISCER) test as a triage method for HPV 16/18-positive women.From November 2021 to December 2022, a total of 334 women who tested positive for HPV 16/18 and were referred to colposcopy at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were studied. The clinical utility of the CISCER test, cytology, and the combination of CISCER with cytology as potential triage tests was compared.We observed a significant increase in the methylation levels of PAX1 gene and JAM3 gene in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or severe (CIN2+). The CISCER test demonstrated superior triage performance over cytology, even when used in combination with cytology, showing a high sensitivity of 89.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.9-95.1%) and specificity of 95.3% (95% CI 92.6-98.0%). It achieved an area under the curve of 0.921 (95% CI 0.877-0.966) and an odds ratio of 164.02 (95% CI 68.64-391.95). The immediate CIN2+ risk based on positive CISCER results would be 89.0% (95% CI 80.8-94.1%), with an estimated average of 1.12 referrals needed to detect one CIN2+ case. Moreover, CISCER triaging successfully identified all cancer patients and did not miss any CIN3+ cases among women aged ≥ 30.The PAX1/JAM3 methylation detection exhibited excellent accuracy in identifying cervical precancerous lesions in HPV 16/18-positive women and could be considered as a triage tool to reduce excessive referrals for colposcopy and overtreatment.© 2024. The Author(s).

This study evaluates the long-term risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) among HPV positive women triaged with FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis.In a post hoc analysis, data on FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation, cytology, and HPV16/18 genotyping of HPV positive women (n = 1025) from a large population-based screening cohort with 14-year follow-up were evaluated. Cumulative CIN3+ incidences over 3 screening rounds (5-year intervals) of 4 triage strategies were compared: FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis, cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping with FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation, and HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology.Kaplan-Meier estimates of 14-year cumulative CIN3+ incidence of HPV positive women with a negative methylation and a negative cytology triage test were comparable (16.3% and 15.6%, respectively). The cumulative CIN3+ incidence of methylation positive and cytology positive women were 39.8% and 46.5%, respectively. HPV16/18 genotyping with methylation and HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology resulted in the lowest 14-year cumulative CIN3+ incidence among triage negative women (10.7% and 10.0%, respectively), but cumulative CIN3+ incidence among triage positive women was lower (33.4% and 35.7%, respectively) compared with triage by methylation alone and cytology alone.Among HPV positive women of 30 years and older, a negative FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation triage test provides a similar long-term CIN3+ risk compared with a negative cytology triage test. Because of their high CIN3+ risk, women with a positive methylation triage test could be referred for colposcopy. Therefore, FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation analysis is a promising alternative to cytology for triage of HPV positive women.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) often present diagnostic challenges with cytology-based results, leading to potential underdiagnosis or overdiagnosis. An effective triage method is essential for managing these cases to reduce unnecessary referrals and treatment.A total of 322 women diagnosed with ASC-US were tested for HPV-DNA and the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1/JAM3) test in the study.Methylation levels of PAX1 and JAM3 were significantly elevated in cervical lesions classified as CIN2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+). The methylation assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.8% and a specificity of 95.8%, outperforming HPV-DNA testing in differentiating high-grade cervical lesions among women with ASC-US. Moreover, PAX1/JAM3 testing significantly reduced the colposcopy referral rate for further diagnostic procedures in high-risk HPV-positive women by 79.5%.PAX1/JAM3 testing shows promise as a reliable supplemental method to HPV-DNA testing for the triage of women with cytologic ASC-US. In addition, the molecular triage based on the CISCER assay or single PAX1 or JAM3 methylation, had better effects in the women with non-HPV16/18 group. This approach could potentially minimize overtreatment and unnecessary referrals in clinical practice, enhancing patient management and resource utilization.© 2024. The Author(s).

To explore the role of a DNA methylation assay for managing minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results in a prospective cohort undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening.In the cohort of the METHY2 and METHY3 screening studies of women undergoing opportunistic cervical cancer screening, cervical cytology samples were sent for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA assays, cytologic pathology and methylation assays of PAX1/JAM3 (CISCER). This study evaluated the discriminative power of CISCER in managing women with minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening results for CIN3+. Absolute CIN3+ risks and colposcopy referrals within one screening round were calculated.A total of 1857 women with minimally abnormal cervical cancer findings had cervical histologic outcomes and were included in the analysis. In women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer result, the sensitivity and specificity of CISCER was 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%-81.4%) and 89.1% (95% CI 87.6%-90.6%) for detecting CIN3+. CISCER analysis discriminated well for minimally abnormal cervical cancer results, yielding a CIN3+ risk of 40.5% (95% CI 34.9%-46.2%) after a positive result and a CIN3+ risk of 2.7% (95% CI 2.0%-3.6%) after a negative result.In women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening result, the CISCER provides excellent detection of CIN3+. The use of CISCER in women with a minimally abnormal cervical cancer screening result can lead to a substantial reduction in the number of direct colposcopy referrals.© 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related carcinomas and premalignancies in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3). Knowledge of this risk is important to preventing the development and progression of other HPV-related premalignancies and carcinomas, by considering prophylactic HPV vaccination and/or by paying increased attention to other HPV-related carcinomas and premalignancies when CIN3 is identified. Methods Women diagnosed with a CIN3 between 1990 and 2010 were identified from the Dutch nationwide registry of histopathology and cytopathology (PALGA) and matched with a control group of women without CIN3. Subsequently, all cases of high-risk (hr) HPV-associated high-grade lesions and carcinomas in the anogenital region and oropharynx between 1990 and 2015 were extracted. Incidence rate ratios were estimated for carcinomas and premalignancies of the vulva, vagina, anus, and oropharynx. Results A total of 178,036 women were identified: 89,018 with a previous diagnosis of CIN3 and 89,018 matched control subjects without a history of CIN3. Women with a history of CIN3 showed increased risk of HPV-related carcinomas and premalignancies, with incidence rate ratios of 3.85 (95% CI, 2.32 to 6.37) for anal cancer, 6.68 (95% CI, 3.64 to 12.25) for anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, 4.97 (95% CI, 3.26 to 7.57) for vulvar cancer, 13.66 (93% CI, 9.69 to 19.25) for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, 86.08 (95% CI, 11.98 to 618.08) for vaginal cancer, 25.65 (95% CI, 10.50 to 62.69) for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, and 5.51 (95% CI, 1.22 to 24.84) for oropharyngeal cancer. This risk remained significantly increased, even after long-term follow-up of up to 20 years. Conclusion This population-based study shows a long-lasting increased risk for HPV-related carcinomas and premalignancies of the anogenital and oropharyngeal region after a CIN3 diagnosis. Studies that investigate methods to prevent this increased risk in this group of patients, such as intensified screening or vaccination, are warranted.

Women treated for CIN2/3 remain at increased risk of recurrent CIN and cervical cancer, and therefore posttreatment surveillance is recommended. This post hoc analysis evaluates the potential of methylation markers ASCL1/LHX8 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 for posttreatment detection of recurrent CIN2/3. Cervical scrapes taken at 6 and 12 months posttreatment of 364 women treated for CIN2/3 were tested for methylation of ASCL1/LHX8 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 using quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR. Performance of the methylation tests were calculated and compared with the performance of HPV and/or cytology. Methylation levels of recurrent CIN were compared between women with a persistent HPV infection, and women with an incident HPV infection or without HPV infection. Recurrent CIN2/3 was detected in 42 women (11.5%), including 28 women with CIN2 and 14 with CIN3. ASCL1/LHX8 tested positive in 13/14 (92.9%) of recurrent CIN3 and 13/27 (48.1%) of recurrent CIN2. FAM19A4/miR124-2 tested positive in 14/14 (100%) of recurrent CIN3 and 10/27 (37.0%) of recurrent CIN2. Combined HPV and/or methylation testing showed similar positivity rates as HPV and/or cytology. The CIN2/3 risk at 12 months posttreatment was 30.8% after a positive ASCL1/LHX8 result at 6 months posttreatment. Methylation levels of CIN2/3 in women with a persistent HPV infection were significantly higher compared with women with an incident or no HPV infection. In conclusion, posttreatment monitoring by methylation analysis of ASCL1/LHX8 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 showed a good performance for the detection of recurrent CIN. DNA methylation testing can help to identify women with recurrent CIN that require re-treatment.© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.