国际妇产科学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 498-502.

• 普通妇科疾病及相关研究 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜下保留神经的广泛性子宫切除术

韩颖,夏志军   

  1. 110004  沈阳,中国医科大学附属盛京医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-25 修回日期:2020-04-21 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2020-10-27
  • 通讯作者: 夏志军,E-mail:xiazj@sj-hospital.org E-mail:1176003972@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国医科大学2018年度临床医学重大专项建设计划(3110118039)

Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy

HAN Ying,XIA Zhi-jun   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China
  • Received:2020-03-25 Revised:2020-04-21 Published:2020-10-15 Online:2020-10-27
  • Contact: XIA Zhi-jun,E-mail:xiazj@sj-hospital.org E-mail:1176003972@qq.com

摘要: 宫颈癌是女性第四大恶性肿瘤,经腹广泛性子宫切除术联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术是其经典治疗方案,术后5年生存率可达80%以上。但是,由于术中盆腔自主神经受到损伤,患者术后往往伴随着严重的盆底功能障碍。为改善患者术后生活质量,保留神经的广泛性子宫切除术(nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy,NSRH)自1961年被提出以来历经了一系列演变。随着腹腔镜技术在妇科恶性肿瘤领域的应用,腹腔镜的放大作用等优势更有利于盆腔的精细解剖,从而降低了保留盆腔自主神经的难度,腹腔镜下保留神经的广泛性子宫切除术(laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy,LNSRH)在临床中逐渐被应用,但该术式仍有许多问题亟待解决,而且目前关于腹腔镜治疗宫颈癌的争议不断,仍需多中心、大样本的前瞻性随机对照研究对LNSRH的安全性进行随访探讨。

关键词: 宫颈肿瘤;, 腹腔镜;, 神经系统;, 子宫切除术;, 手术后期间;, 尿动力学

Abstract: Cervical cancer is the fourth most malignant tumor in women. Abdominal radical hysterectomy combined with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a classic treatment option, with a 5-years survival rate of over 80% postoperatively. However, due to the injury of the pelvic autonomic nerves (PAN), severe pelvic floor dysfunction is often followed. In order to improve the quality of life after surgery, nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) has undergone a series of evolutions since 1961. With the application of laparoscopy in the field of gynecological malignancies, it has been found that the advantages of laparoscopy, such as magnification, making it easier to identify, dissect and preserve PAN in laparoscopic procedure of extensive hysterectomy (laparoscopic nerve - sparing radical hysterectomy, LNSRH), which has been used in clinic gradually. Although LNSRH can improve the pelvic floor function for early-stage cervical cancer patients, there are still many problems to be solved for the operation, and the current controversy about laparoscopic treatment of cervical cancer continues. The safety analysis of multicenter, large-sample prospective randomized controlled studies are still needed.

Key words: Uterine cervical neoplasms;, Laparoscopes;, Nervous system;, Hysterectomy;, Postoperative period;, Urodynamics