国际妇产科学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 514-518.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20230397

• 产科生理及产科疾病:论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

妊娠期遗传性耳聋易感基因携带者扩展型筛查模式研究

谢晓媛, 冯树人, 刘慧坤, 王蕾棽, 刘霞()   

  1. 300070 天津市妇女儿童保健中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-30 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘霞,E-mail:rustyfengsr@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    天津市卫生健康委员会科技项目(MS20018);天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目(TJYXZDXK-075C)

Study on the Extended Screening Model for Carriers of Genetic Deafness Susceptibility Genes in Pregnancy

XIE Xiao-yuan, FENG Shu-ren, LIU Hui-kun, WANG Lei-shen, LIU Xia()   

  1. Tianjin Women and Children′s Health Center, Tianjin 300070, China
  • Received:2023-05-30 Published:2023-10-15 Online:2023-10-16
  • Contact: LIU Xia, E-mail: rustyfengsr@hotmail.com

摘要:

目的:探讨天津市范围内开展妊娠期耳聋基因携带者筛查的扩展型筛查模式适用性。方法:结合以往天津市开展新生儿听力与基因联合筛查模式下获取的耳聋基因突变位点在天津市居住人群中的分布情况,对1 427例妊娠期孕妇及部分孕妇配偶进行扩展型遗传性耳聋易感基因检测。应用高通量测序技术对包括GJB2、GJB3等在内的24个耳聋相关基因上共208个致病变异位点进行筛查分析。对于高通量测序检出相关基因变异位点的孕妇样本,用Sanger测序法对检出的变异位点进行验证。确认孕妇为遗传性耳聋基因致病突变携带者后,对其配偶同样采用上述流程进行检测,并对其配偶相关基因全序列进行分析。结果:1 427例孕妇中,扩展型耳聋基因筛查共发现耳聋基因致病突变携带者100例,其中GJB2基因突变携带者45例,SLC26A4杂合突变携带者41例,TMPRSS3杂合突变携带者2例,LRTOMT杂合突变携带者1例,MT-RNR1同质突变者11例。上述100例孕妇中携带核基因组耳聋相关基因变异的89例配偶中,共检出耳聋基因突变携带者6例,其中5例与其配偶携带的突变位于相同基因。与天津市妇女儿童保健中心以往仅检测4个基因20个位点的筛查模式相比,扩展型筛查检出的100例阳性携带者中有9例携带的变异位点不在以往筛查范围之内。结论:通过耳聋基因携带者筛查,将相应出生缺陷预防关口前移至妊娠期或妊娠前,可以作为新生儿听力及基因联合筛查方案的补充。随着测序技术的发展和成本的下降,扩展型筛查模式的应用有助于发现以往筛查模式中可能漏检的变异携带者。

关键词: 听力障碍, 基因检测, 突变, 遗传咨询, 耳聋易感基因

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the applicability of the extended screening model to carry out screening of deafness susceptibility genes in pregnancy in Tianjin. Methods: Combined with the distribution of deafness gene mutation sites in Tianjin resident population obtained under the model of newborn hearing and gene screening, the susceptibility genes of 1 427 pregnant women and some of the spouses of pregnant women were tested for extended genetic deafness susceptibility genes. A total of 208 mutation sites in 24 genes related to deafness, including GJB2 and GJB3, were screened and analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. Positive results identified by high-throughput sequencing were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. After verifying that the pregnant women were carriers of the disease-causing mutations on genes from the nuclear genome, their spouses were also analyzed via the same test scheme as described above, in addition to full-length analysis of the same gene identified in the female. Results: Among 1 427 pregnant women tested, 100 individuals with at least one pathogenic mutations of deafness genes were found by extended deafness gene screening, including 45 individuals with GJB2 gene mutations, 41 carriers of heterozygous mutations in the SLC26A4 gene, 2 carriers of heterozygous mutations in the TMPRSS3 gene, 1 carrier of LRTOMT gene mutation, and 11 individuals with homogeneous mutations on the mitochondrial gene MT-RNR1. Spouses of the above individuals with genomic deafness gene mutations were screened following the same procedures, and 6 deafness gene mutation carriers were detected, with 5 of them carrying mutations on the same gene as their spouses. Nine out of the 100 individuals detected by the extended screening scheme would have been missed using the original screening scheme, which only tests for 20 hotspot mutations from 4 target genes. Conclusions: Genetic screening for deafness related mutations in pregnant or pre-pregnant couples allows for earlier detection of potential birth defects, which can serve as a supplement to the newborn hearing concurrent gene screening program for hearing impairment. With advances in sequencing technology and decrease of sequencing costs, the application of extended screening scheme can help to identify additional carriers of deafness gene mutations missed by the original testing scheme.

Key words: Hearing disorders, Genetic testing, Mutation, Genetic counseling, Deafness susceptibility genes