Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 296-301.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20210895
• Research on Gynecological Malignancies:Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yi, LIU Qing, LIU Kai-jiang(), CHENG Jie-jun
Received:
2021-09-28
Published:
2022-06-15
Online:
2022-06-23
Contact:
LIU Kai-jiang
E-mail:liukaijiang@263.net
LIU Yi, LIU Qing, LIU Kai-jiang, CHENG Jie-jun. The Value of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pelvic and Abdominal Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 49(3): 296-301.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
[1] |
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 |
[2] |
Devine C, Viswanathan C, Faria S, et al. Imaging and Staging of Cervical Cancer[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2019, 40(4):280-286. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.03.001.
doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.03.001 |
[3] |
Jeong SY, Park H, Kim MS, et al. Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2020, 52(2):516-523. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.328.
doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.328 |
[4] |
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, et al. Cancer of the cervix uteri[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2018, 143(Suppl 2):22-36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12611.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12611 |
[5] |
Prativadi R, Dahiya N, Kamaya A, et al. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2017, 38(5):506-515. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.05.005.
doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.05.005 |
[6] |
Haldorsen IS, Lura N, Blaakær J, et al. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2019, 21(9):77. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0824-0.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0824-0 pmid: 31359169 |
[7] |
Epstein E, Testa A, Gaurilcikas A, et al. Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 128(3):449-453. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.025.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.025 |
[8] |
Saleh M, Virarkar M, Javadi S, et al. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2020, 214(5):1182-1195. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21819.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21819 |
[9] |
Zhang Y, Yan Y, Yang Y. Study on value of ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of clinical staging of cervical cancer and efficacy evaluation of radiotherapy[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 17(6):4901-4906. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10190.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10190 |
[10] |
Zheng W, Chen K, Peng C, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for evaluation of local invasion by cervical cancer[J]. Br J Radiol, 2018, 91(1091):20170858. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170858.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170858 |
[11] |
Paño B, Sebastià C, Ripoll E, et al. Pathways of lymphatic spread in gynecologic malignancies[J]. Radiographics, 2015, 35(3):916-945. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140086.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140086 |
[12] |
Fernando IN, Moskovic E, Fryatt I, et al. Is there still a role for lymphography in the management of early stage carcinoma of the cervix?[J]. Br J Radiol, 1994, 67(803):1052-1056. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-803-1052.
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-803-1052 |
[13] |
Chen J, He B, Dong D, et al. Noninvasive CT radiomic model for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in early cervical carcinoma[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93(1108):20190558. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190558.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190558 |
[14] |
Luo L, Luo Q, Tang L. Diagnostic value and clinical significance of MRI and CT in detecting lymph node metastasis of early cervical cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020, 19(1):700-706. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11180.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11180 |
[15] |
Yamanoi K, Matsumura N, Kido A, et al. A novel diagnostic criterion for lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer using multi-detector computed tomography[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 131(3):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.014.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.014 pmid: 24145112 |
[16] |
Zhang R, Liu Z, Zhou C, et al. Diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging in primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Minerva Med, 2021 Oct 21. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07855-1.
doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07855-1 |
[17] |
Pan Z, Pang L, Ding B, et al. Gastric cancer staging with dual energy spectral CT imaging[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2):e53651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053651.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053651 |
[18] |
Testa AC, Di Legge A, De Blasis I, et al. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28(5):741-768. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.009 |
[19] |
Liu B, Gao S, Li S. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2017, 82(3):209-222. doi: 10.1159/000456006.
doi: 10.1159/000456006 |
[20] |
Shen G, Zhou H, Jia Z, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Radiol, 2015, 88(1052):20150063. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150063.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150063 |
[21] |
Long L, Zhang H, He X, et al. Value of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic mesorectal lymph nodes with different short-axis diameters in rectal cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2019, 15(7):1508-1515. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_76_19.
doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_76_19 |
[22] |
Kim SH, Cho SH. Assessment of pelvic lymph node metastasis in FIGO IB and IIA cervical cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2020, 26(5):382-389. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19365.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19365 |
[23] |
Adam JA, van Diepen PR, Mom CH, et al. [(18)F]FDG-PET or PET/CT in the evaluation of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 159(2):588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.021.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.021 |
[24] |
Atri M, Zhang Z, Dehdashti F, et al. Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer: Results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 142(3):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.002 |
[25] |
De Cuypere M, Lovinfosse P, Goffin F, et al. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the external beam radiation field for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: An ONCO-GF study[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(5):883-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.496.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.496 |
[26] |
Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2018, 127(3):404-416. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003.
doi: S0167-8140(18)30135-X pmid: 29728273 |
[27] |
Sarabhai T, Schaarschmidt BM, Wetter A, et al.Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI for pre-therapeutic tumor staging of patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2018, 45(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3809-y.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3809-y |
[28] |
Nguyen NC, Beriwal S, Moon CH, et al. Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/MRI in Females With Pelvic Malignancy-A Systematic Review of the Literature[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10:519440. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.519440.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.519440 |
[1] | ZHANG Yong-qing, CHEN Zheng-yun, CHEN Lu-ping, YAN Guo-hui, CHEN Dan-qing. Two Cases of Term Angular Pregnancy Identified during Cesarean Section [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(2): 153-157. |
[2] | GUO Jing, ZHANG Mao-xiang, ZHOU Chun-he, LIU Si-ning, LI Hui-yan. The Progress of Mendelian Randomization in the Study of the Causal Relationship between Exposure Factors and Cervical Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(2): 169-174. |
[3] | CHAI Ling-na, LI Yan-li, SHI Jie, GAO Han, OUYANG Xi-yan, CHENG Shi-yu. Clinical Application of Indocyanine Green Tracing of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early Cervical Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(2): 175-179. |
[4] | BAI Yao-jun, WANG Si-yao, LING Fei-fei, ZHANG Sen-huai, LI Hong-li, LIU Chang. Progress of Trop-2 and Targeted Trop-2 Antibody-Coupled Drugs in Gynecological Malignant Tumors [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(1): 1-7. |
[5] | HU Ming-zhu, LIU Li-wen, HUANG Lei. The Relationship between Vaginal Microecology and Cervical Cancer in HIV-Infected Women [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(1): 13-18. |
[6] | SONG Li-fang, WU Zhen-zhen, MAO Bao-hong, ZHAO Xiao-li, LIU Qing. A Case of Isolated Lymph Node Metastasis from Ovarian Cancer to the Inguinal Region [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(1): 37-41. |
[7] | ZHANG Ye, CHEN Qiao-yun, ZHAO Jia-yi, CHEN Lu, LIU Jian-rong. Progress in the Application of Nanoparticles in the Prevention and Treatment of Cervical Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(1): 8-12. |
[8] | WEI Jin-hua, QI Yu-chao, SHEN Xiao-ya. Analysis on the Incidence and Mortality of Cervical Cancer in China Based on the Age-Period-Cohort Model from 1992 to 2021 [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(6): 664-668. |
[9] | LIU Yu, WU Rui-fang, LI Rui-zhen. A Case Report of Pregnancy after Radical Cervicectomy with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage ⅠB2 Cervical Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(6): 669-671. |
[10] | SONG Han, LIU Han-li, WANG Xi-bo. A Case of Soft Tissue Metastasis in the Back from Cervical Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(6): 672-675. |
[11] | WANG Jing, WANG Xiao-hui. Cervical Carcinosarcoma:A Case Report and Literature Review [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(5): 597-600. |
[12] | ZHANG Yan, HU Meng-ying, WANG Hua, DONG Qu-long. Progress in The Application of Ultrasound-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Gynecological and Obstetric Diseases [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(4): 406-411. |
[13] | HE Yu-ru, XIA Ge-qing. Research Progress on the Brain Injury in Survivors Following Single Intrauterine Fetal Death in Monochorionic Twins [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(4): 458-462. |
[14] | WANG Qiu-ming, WANG Rui-li, WU Hai-ying, WANG Li. Intrafetal Radiofrequency Ablation for Fetal Pulmonary Sequestration with Edema and Pleural Effusion: A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(4): 477-480. |
[15] | SI Jing-wen, YU Xiu-jie, SHEN Yan. The Impact of the 2023 FIGO Staging Update of Endometrial Carcinoma on the Content of Pathological Diagnosis [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(3): 241-246. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||