Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 509-514.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20240509
• Gynecological Disease & Related Research: Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHAO Hui, WANG Lu, CHEN Lu-jia, DONG Rui-jia, TANG Jie-ying, LIAO Xue-yin, YANG Jian-min, LI Wei-wei()
Received:
2024-05-30
Published:
2024-10-15
Online:
2024-10-17
Contact:
LI Wei-wei, E-mail: SHAO Hui, WANG Lu, CHEN Lu-jia, DONG Rui-jia, TANG Jie-ying, LIAO Xue-yin, YANG Jian-min, LI Wei-wei. Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on the Efficacy of A Novel Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Treatment for Postpartum Vaginal Laxity[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(5): 509-514.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | BMI (kg/m2) | 民族 | 阴道分娩次数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
汉族 | 其他民族 | 1 | 2 | ||||
试验组 | 21 | 38.10±4.53 | 22.06±3.16 | 19(90.5) | 2(9.5) | 10(47.6) | 11(52.4) |
对照组 | 22 | 36.59±6.25 | 22.76±3.61 | 21(95.5) | 1(4.5) | 8(36.4) | 14(63.6) |
t或χ2 | 0.900 | -0.677 | - | 0.559 | |||
P | 0.373 | 0.502 | 0.607* | 0.455 |
组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | BMI (kg/m2) | 民族 | 阴道分娩次数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
汉族 | 其他民族 | 1 | 2 | ||||
试验组 | 21 | 38.10±4.53 | 22.06±3.16 | 19(90.5) | 2(9.5) | 10(47.6) | 11(52.4) |
对照组 | 22 | 36.59±6.25 | 22.76±3.61 | 21(95.5) | 1(4.5) | 8(36.4) | 14(63.6) |
t或χ2 | 0.900 | -0.677 | - | 0.559 | |||
P | 0.373 | 0.502 | 0.607* | 0.455 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 | F时间 | P时间 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 23.83±3.19 | 27.14±2.80a | 29.09±3.03ab | 31.41±2.54ab | 32.55±2.16ab | 48.005 | 0.000 |
对照组 | 22 | 24.91±4.91 | 25.21±3.97 | 25.70±3.93 | 25.25±3.97 | 24.88±4.60 | 0.741 | 0.570 |
F组别 | 0.731 | 3.345 | 10.003 | 36.271 | 48.194 | |||
P组别 | 0.397 | 0.075 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 | F时间 | P时间 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 23.83±3.19 | 27.14±2.80a | 29.09±3.03ab | 31.41±2.54ab | 32.55±2.16ab | 48.005 | 0.000 |
对照组 | 22 | 24.91±4.91 | 25.21±3.97 | 25.70±3.93 | 25.25±3.97 | 24.88±4.60 | 0.741 | 0.570 |
F组别 | 0.731 | 3.345 | 10.003 | 36.271 | 48.194 | |||
P组别 | 0.397 | 0.075 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 15.00(6.50,22.50) | 11.00(3.00,17.00)a | 6.00(0.00,13.50)ab | 2.00(0.00,5.50)ab* | 0.00(0.00,3.50)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 14.50(7.50,24.75) | 13.50(9.75,19.75) | 11.00(5.00,19.00) | 12.50(5.75,21.00) | 14.00(7.75,24.75) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=54.799,Wald χ2组别=8.357,Wald χ2时间×组别=48.766 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别=0.004,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 15.00(6.50,22.50) | 11.00(3.00,17.00)a | 6.00(0.00,13.50)ab | 2.00(0.00,5.50)ab* | 0.00(0.00,3.50)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 14.50(7.50,24.75) | 13.50(9.75,19.75) | 11.00(5.00,19.00) | 12.50(5.75,21.00) | 14.00(7.75,24.75) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=54.799,Wald χ2组别=8.357,Wald χ2时间×组别=48.766 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别=0.004,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 3.00(2.00,3.00) | 4.00(3.00,4.00)a* | 4.00(3.00,5.00)ab* | 4.00(4.00,5.00)ab* | 5.00(4.00,6.00)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.00)a | 3.00(3.00,3.00)ab | 3.00(2.00,3.25)a | 3.00(2.00,3.00) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=30.850,Wald χ2组别=147.733,Wald χ2时间×组别=97.589 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 3.00(2.00,3.00) | 4.00(3.00,4.00)a* | 4.00(3.00,5.00)ab* | 4.00(4.00,5.00)ab* | 5.00(4.00,6.00)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.00)a | 3.00(3.00,3.00)ab | 3.00(2.00,3.25)a | 3.00(2.00,3.00) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=30.850,Wald χ2组别=147.733,Wald χ2时间×组别=97.589 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 2.00(2.00,2.50) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.50)ab | 4.00(3.00,4.00)ab* | 4.00(4.00,4.50)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 2.00(1.75,2.25) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 2.00(2.00,3.25) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 2.00(1.75,3.00) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=12.913,Wald χ2组别=93.156,Wald χ2时间×组别=97.166 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 2.00(2.00,2.50) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.50)ab | 4.00(3.00,4.00)ab* | 4.00(4.00,4.50)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 2.00(1.75,2.25) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 2.00(2.00,3.25) | 2.00(2.00,3.00) | 2.00(1.75,3.00) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=12.913,Wald χ2组别=93.156,Wald χ2时间×组别=97.166 | |||||
P | P时间<0.001,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 51.30(44.20,56.50) | 48.30(43.75,53.30) | 47.70(43.05,51.25)ab | 46.30(42.60,51.00)ab* | 45.90(42.50,50.65)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 48.85(44.70,56.17) | 48.95(45.25,56.10) | 49.50(45.27,56.15) | 50.70(45.85,57.05) | 49.65(45.27,56.17) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=2.235,Wald χ2组别=40.926,Wald χ2时间×组别=52.378 | |||||
P | P时间=0.135,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 51.30(44.20,56.50) | 48.30(43.75,53.30) | 47.70(43.05,51.25)ab | 46.30(42.60,51.00)ab* | 45.90(42.50,50.65)ab* |
对照组 | 22 | 48.85(44.70,56.17) | 48.95(45.25,56.10) | 49.50(45.27,56.15) | 50.70(45.85,57.05) | 49.65(45.27,56.17) |
Wald χ2 | Wald χ2时间=2.235,Wald χ2组别=40.926,Wald χ2时间×组别=52.378 | |||||
P | P时间=0.135,P组别<0.001,P时间×组别<0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 11(52.4) | 16(76.2) | 17(81.0) | 19(90.5) |
对照组 | 22 | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) |
χ2 | 12.220 | 23.071 | 25.773 | 31.890 | |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗18周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 21 | 11(52.4) | 16(76.2) | 17(81.0) | 19(90.5) |
对照组 | 22 | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) |
χ2 | 12.220 | 23.071 | 25.773 | 31.890 | |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗后18周 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | ||
试验组 | 21 | 6(28.6) | 9(42.9) | 11(52.4) | 12(57.1) | 17(81.0) | 16(76.2) | 11(52.4) | 18(85.7) |
对照组 | 22 | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) |
χ2 | - | - | 12.220 | 14.092 | 25.773 | 26.695 | 12.220 | 32.434 | |
P | 0.046* | 0.001* | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | n | 治疗3周后 | 治疗6周后 | 治疗10周后 | 治疗后18周 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | 着色 | 弹性 | ||
试验组 | 21 | 6(28.6) | 9(42.9) | 11(52.4) | 12(57.1) | 17(81.0) | 16(76.2) | 11(52.4) | 18(85.7) |
对照组 | 22 | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.5) | 0(0.0) |
χ2 | - | - | 12.220 | 14.092 | 25.773 | 26.695 | 12.220 | 32.434 | |
P | 0.046* | 0.001* | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
[1] | 中华医学会整形外科学分会指南筹备组. 阴道松弛症整形外科治疗指南[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2021, 37(3):244-252. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20210115-00020. |
[2] |
Qureshi AA, Tenenbaum MM, Myckatyn TM. Nonsurgical Vulvovaginal Rejuvenation With Radiofrequency and Laser Devices: A Literature Review and Comprehensive Update for Aesthetic Surgeons[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2018, 38(3):302-311. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx138.
pmid: 29040373 |
[3] | 宋文静, 王晶, 刘美华, 等. 温控射频治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2023, 50(2):176-180. doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20220878. |
[4] | Sun X, Li C, Jin L, et al. Development and validation of Chinese version of female sexual function index in a Chinese population-a pilot study[J]. J Sex Med, 2011, 8(4):1101-1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02171.x. |
[5] | Hevesi K, Mészáros V, Kövi Z, et al. Different Characteristics of the Female Sexual Function Index in a Sample of Sexually Active and Inactive Women[J]. J Sex Med, 2017, 14(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.07.008. |
[6] |
Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, et al. The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women[J]. J Sex Marital Ther, 2002, 28(4):317-330. doi: 10.1080/00926230290001448.
pmid: 12082670 |
[7] | Millheiser LS, Pauls RN, Herbst SJ, et al. Radiofrequency treatment of vaginal laxity after vaginal delivery: nonsurgical vaginal tightening[J]. J Sex Med, 2010, 7(9):3088-3095. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01910.x. |
[8] |
Palacios S. Vaginal hyperlaxity syndrome: a new concept and challenge[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2018, 34(5):360-362. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1418312.
pmid: 29275641 |
[9] | Leibaschoff G, Izasa PG, Cardona JL, et al. Transcutaneous Temperature Controlled Radiofrequency (TTCRF) for the Treatment of Menopausal Vaginal/Genitourinary Symptoms[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2016,29:149-159. |
[10] | 邵辉, 王璐, 董芮嘉, 等. 基于面部解剖学微创技术在中面部年轻化的临床进展[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2024, 33(1):41-47. doi: 10.13480/j.issn1003-9430.2024.0041. |
[11] |
Fu L, Long S, Li Q, et al. The efficacy and safety of temperature controlled dual-mode radiofrequency in women with vaginal laxity[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2023, 23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02261-y.
pmid: 36959573 |
[12] | 李志毅, 朱兰, 徐涛, 等. 中国城市地区女性盆腔器官脱垂临床流行病学调查[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(11):857-861. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.11.012. |
[13] |
Jackson SR, Avery NC, Tarlton JF, et al. Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse[J]. Lancet, 1996, 347(9016):1658-1661. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91489-0.
pmid: 8642960 |
[14] |
Chen B, Wen Y, Zhang Z, et al. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in vaginal tissues from women with stress urinary incontinence compared with asymptomatic women[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(1):22-29. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei276.
pmid: 16126751 |
[15] |
Vanaman Wilson MJ, Bolton J, Jones IT, et al. Histologic and Clinical Changes in Vulvovaginal Tissue After Treatment With a Transcutaneous Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Device[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2018, 44(5):705-713. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001453.
pmid: 29701623 |
[16] | Kent DE, Bernardy J. Safety and mechanism of action of noninvasive radiofrequency treatment for vaginal laxity: Histological study in the swine vaginal model[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020, 19(6):1361-1366. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13159. |
[17] | Krychman ML. Vaginal Laxity Issues, Answers and Implications for Female Sexual Function[J]. J Sex Med, 2016, 13(10):1445-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.07.016. |
[18] | Dayan E, Ramirez H, Theodorou S. Radiofrequency Treatment of Labia Minora and Majora: A Minimally Invasive Approach to Vulva Restoration[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2020, 8(4):e2418. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002418. |
[19] | Elbiss HM, Rafaqat W, Khan KS. The effect of dynamic quadripolar radiofrequency on genitourinary atrophy and sexual satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2022, 101(40):e30960. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030960. |
[1] | XIE Wan-ying, QIU Xiao-yuan, YAO Jun-xue, CUI Hong-yan. The Role of Pregnant Women's Educational School in Promoting Natural Delivery by Diversified Teaching Modes [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(1): 37-41. |
[2] | SONG Wen-jing, WANG Jing, LIU Mei-hua, WANG Xiao-hui. Research Advances in Temperature Controlled Radiofrequency Treatment for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023, 50(2): 176-180. |
[3] | WANG Zhao, PING Yi. Animal Models of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions and Biomechanical Measurements [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 49(5): 502-506. |
[4] | LIU Yin-xia, ZHANG Bin, WANG Yu-xian. Research Status of Prenatal and Perinatal Influence Factors of Female Levator Ani Muscle Injury [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 48(5): 503-507. |
[5] | BAI Jun, HAO Yu-jing, GAO Yan-ping. Research Progress of Vaginal Laxity Syndrome in Etiology [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020, 47(4): 417-421. |
[6] | WU Xiao-tong,WANG Jian-liu,SUN Xiu-li. Tissue Engineering in Rehabilitate Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 46(4): 378-381. |
[7] | MAO Hui,HUANG Cheng-sheng,WU Qing-kai,ZHOU Yue-di. The Application of Biomechanics in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 46(2): 212-215. |
[8] | FAN Xiao-dong,ZHU Ying-jun. Progress about Surgical Treatment of Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 46(1): 27-31. |
[9] | CHEN Rui-e,ZHOU Xing-zhi,DING Miao,CHEN Jin,XIE Xin,LIN Zhong-qiu,CHEN Mei-wan. Advance on the Pathogenesis of Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 44(5): 589-593. |
[10] | YAN Bin;MA Jun;LIU Da-qing;YANG Rong;MA Qing-liang;WANG Yu. Effect and Mechanism of Pueraria in Women with Pelvic Floor Dysfunction [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, 42(2): 197-200. |
[11] | JIANG Li;WANG Xia-hong;WU Qing-kai;XI Jie;CAO Yun-gui;ZHANG Qing;ZHU Mei-juan;YAO Jing. Analysis of the Factors Influenced the Dysfunction of Pelvic Floor in Primipara [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014, 41(2): 204-206. |
[12] | MAO Xiao-yuan;WU Qing-kai. Female Pelvic Floor Remodeling in Perinatal Period [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, 36(6): 434-436. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||