宫颈锥切术对生育力和妊娠结局的影响及改善措施

doi:10.12280/gjfckx.20240150

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

宫颈癌是女性最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤，随着三级预防及筛查工作的普及，宫颈癌发病率逐渐下降，育龄期妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变（cervical intraepithelial neoplasia，CIN）的检出率也逐渐增加。宫颈锥切术是诊断和治疗CIN的重要方法，宫颈冷刀锥切术（cold knife conization，CKC）和宫颈环形电切术（loop electrosurgical excision procedure，LEEP）是常用的术式。近年多项研究表明宫颈锥切术不显著影响生育力，但与一些不良妊娠结局的发生有关，如早产、胎膜早破和剖宫产等。不良妊娠结局发生的风险与锥切手术方式、切除范围、术后妊娠间隔时间有关。术后不良妊娠结局的发生风险随着锥切范围的增加而增加。LEEP与CKC治疗CIN疗效相当，但LEEP术后妊娠结局优于CKC。为减少不良妊娠结局的发生，降低病变复发率，可延长术后避孕时间、加强妊娠期监测，必要时行宫颈环扎术和接种人乳头瘤病毒（human papilloma virus，HPV）疫苗等。

关键词: 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变, 锥形切除术, 妊娠结局, 宫颈功能不全, 乳头状瘤病毒疫苗

Abstract:

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in women. With the widespread adoption of tertiary prevention and screening, the incidence of cervical cancer has been gradually decreasing, while the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women of reproductive age has been gradually increasing. Cervical conization is an important method for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN, of which cold knife conization (CKC) and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) are commonly used. In recent years, several studies have shown that cervical conization does not significantly affect fertility, but is associated with the occurrence of some adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes, and cesarean section. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is associated with the conization procedure, the extent of resection, and the postoperative pregnancy interval. The incidence of postoperative adverse pregnancy outcomes increased with the increase in the extent of conization. The efficacy of LEEP and CKC in the treatment of CIN was comparable, but the postoperative pregnancy outcomes of LEEP were better than those of CKC. To reduce the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and decrease the recurrence rate of the lesions, postoperative contraception can be extended, pregnancy monitoring can be strengthened, and if necessary, cervical cerclage and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine can be performed.

Key words: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Conization, Pregnancy outcome, Uterine cervical incompetence, Papillomavirus vaccines

苏瑞瑞, 武晓红. 宫颈锥切术对生育力和妊娠结局的影响及改善措施[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 317-321.

SU Rui-rui, WU Xiao-hong. Impact of Cervical Conization on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes and Improve Measures[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(3): 317-321.

参考文献 28

[1]	Roncati L. Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies: A Special Issue in Line with 2030 Agenda[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(13):3797. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133797.
[2]	World Health Organization. Female genital tumours. IARC. WHO classification of tumours.5th Edition[EB/OL]. [2021-01-25]. https://tumourclassification. iarc.who.int/9789283245049.
[3]	Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 2015(9):CD008478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008478.pub2.
[4]	王琦, 巢金珍, 伍琼芳, 等. 宫颈冷刀锥切术对女性生育能力与妊娠结局的影响分析[J]. 江西医药, 2019, 54(4):374-376. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2019.4.025.
[5]	王培, 丁卉, 凌秀凤, 等. 宫颈锥切术后患者行体外受精-胚胎移植后的妊娠结局分析[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2020, 39(4):284-286,313. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1889.2020.04.004.
[6]	Miyakoshi K, Itakura A, Abe T, et al. Risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery for cervical lesions: a propensity-score matching study in Japan[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021, 34(6):845-851. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619687.
[7]	Loopik DL, van Drongelen J, Bekkers RLM, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A Dutch population-based cohort study with 45,259 pregnancy outcomes[J]. PLoS Med, 2021, 18(6):e1003665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003665.
[8]	钟俊, 黄思毅, 郭玉峰, 等. 宫颈锥切术后影响孕妇胎膜早破因素分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(7):1689-1693. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2022.07.051.
[9]	Obut M, İskender CT, Kından A, et al. Factors Affecting Obstetric Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Cold-Knife and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization Due to CIN 2 or CIN 3[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2023 Dec 8. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2023-1-15.
[10]	Gao Y, Wang H, Xiao Y. The effect of cold-knife conization on pregnancy outcomes in patients with cervical lesions[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(12):e0278505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278505.
[11]	付华, 吴美凤. LEEP手术对子宫颈上皮内瘤变患者术后妊娠结局及分娩方式的影响[J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18 (32):112-114. doi: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2020.32.042.
[12]	Åström E, Turkmen S. Obstetric outcomes after cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. Cancer Treat Res Commun, 2023,34:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100668.
[13]	徐燕, 朱丽芳, 王丹, 等. 宫颈病变治疗方案对妇女妊娠结局及分娩方式影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(7):1108-1113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2020.07.036.
[14]	李著艳, 黄卉, 马亚琳, 等. 传统冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变对于近远期效果的影响分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2018, 27(6):43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.06.014.
[15]	Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2012, 120(1):166-172. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c.
[16]	赵超, 毕蕙, 赵昀, 等. 子宫颈高级别上皮内病变管理的中国专家共识[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(2):220-224. doi: 10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2022.02.038.
[17]	Wiik J, Kärrberg C, Nilsson S, et al. Associations between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy, previous excisional treatment, cone-length and preterm delivery: a register-based study from western Sweden[J]. BMC Med, 2022, 20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02276-6. pmid: 35189872
[18]	Paternostro C, Joura EA, Ranftl C, et al. Rate of Involved Endocervical Margins According to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Subtype and Transformation Zone Type in Specimens with Cone Length ≤ 10 mm versus > 10 mm-A Retrospective Analysis[J]. Life(Basel), 2023, 13(8):1775. doi: 10.3390/life13081775.
[19]	Srijarusith N, Rodpenpear N. The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2022, 23(2):659-664. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.659.
[20]	Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM, et al. Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015, 128(2):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.038. pmid: 25444615
[21]	林毅, 徐琼飞, 王宁宁. 宫颈LEEP术与CKC术后宫颈再生对比研究[J]. 中国现代医生, 2021, 59(30):1-5.
[22]	Zhang X, Tong J, Ma X, et al. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(49):e23411. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023411.
[23]	完颜文亚. 不同宫颈锥切术对妊娠及妊娠结局的影响分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022. doi: 10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin.2021.004235.
[24]	何玥, 吴玉梅, 阴赪宏. 预防性宫颈环扎术对宫颈冷刀锥切术后妊娠结局的作用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(4):419-424. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.04.009.
[25]	Park HS, Kim HS, Lee SA, et al. Prophylactic Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth after Conization: A Cohort Study Using Data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2021, 62(12):1083-1089. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1083. pmid: 34816638
[26]	中华医学会妇科肿瘤学分会,中国优生科学协会阴道镜和宫颈病理学分会. 人乳头瘤病毒疫苗临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2021, 22(2):后插1-后插10. doi: 10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2021.02.045.
[27]	Chen M, Li C, Cui Q, et al. The efficacy of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccination after conization in preventing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence: A prospective observational study in China[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2023, 286:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.04.014. pmid: 37159990
[28]	Petráš M, Dvořák V, Lomozová D, et al. Timing of HPV vaccination as adjuvant treatment of CIN2+ recurrence in women undergoing surgical excision: a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. Sex Transm Infect, 2023, 99(8):561-570. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055793. pmid: 37553234