国际妇产科学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 48-53.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20251137

• 普通妇科疾病及相关研究: 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

盆底功能障碍背景下直肠内脱垂的分级标准及诊疗策略

刘飞虎(), 管忠安()   

  1. 250000 济南,山东中医药大学第一临床医学院(刘飞虎);山东中医药大学附属医院肛肠科(管忠安)
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-13 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 管忠安 E-mail:gwy199153@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    齐鲁中医药优势专科集群项目(YWC2022ZKJQ0003)

Standardized Criteria and Management Strategies for Internal Rectal Prolapse in the Context of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

LIU Fei-hu(), GUAN Zhong-an()   

  1. First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250000, China (LIU Fei-hu); Department of Proctology, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250000, China (GUAN Zhong-an)
  • Received:2025-10-13 Published:2026-02-15 Online:2026-03-11
  • Contact: GUAN Zhong-an E-mail:gwy199153@sina.com

摘要:

盆底功能障碍(pelvic floor dysfunction,PFD)是一类以尿失禁、排便功能障碍和盆腔器官脱垂为主要表现的临床综合征,严重影响患者生活质量,其中直肠内脱垂(internal rectal prolapse,IRP)作为PFD的重要组成部分,其分级与盆底支持结构的完整性密切相关。现有证据表明,PFD所引起的盆底支持结构退化与肛提肌功能障碍是IRP发生发展的关键驱动因素。IRP分级与盆底损伤程度显著相关,高级别IRP(Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)多伴随严重的盆底解剖与功能异常。动态磁共振排粪造影(dynamic magnetic resonance defecography,DMRD)及高分辨率肛肠测压(high-resolution anorectal manometry,HR-ARM)是实现客观分级与功能评估的关键工具。治疗上,低分级IRP对盆底肌训练(pelvic floor muscle training,PFMT)反应良好,而高分级IRP常需手术干预。目前该领域仍缺乏统一的分级标准与前瞻性队列研究的支持,未来应致力于构建多中心协作、整合影像组学与人工智能技术的标准化分级体系,以推动精准诊疗。

关键词: 盆底疾病, 直肠脱垂, 诊断, 分级标准, 盆底肌训练

Abstract:

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a clinical syndrome mainly characterized by urinary incontinence, defecation dysfunction, and pelvic organ prolapse, which significantly affects the quality of patients' life. Internal rectal prolapse (IRP), as an important component of PFD, is closely related to the integrity of the pelvic floor support structure in terms of its grading. Current evidence shows that the degeneration of the pelvic floor support structures and the dysfunction of the levator ani muscle caused by PFD are the key driving factors for the occurrence and development of IRP. The grading of IRP is significantly correlated with the degree of pelvic floor injury. High-grade IRP (Grades Ⅲ-Ⅳ) is often accompanied by severe pelvic floor anatomical and functional abnormalities. Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography (DMRD) and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) are the key tools for objective grading and functional evaluation. In terms of treatment, low-grade IRP responds well to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), while high-grade IRP often requires surgical intervention. Currently, there is still a lack of a unified grading standard and support from prospective cohort studies in this field. In the future, efforts should be made to construct a standardized grading system through multi-center collaboration, integrating radiomics and artificial intelligence technologies to promote precision diagnosis and treatment.

Key words: Pelvic floor disorders, Prolapse of rectum, Diagnosis, Standardized criteria, Pelvic floor muscle training