
Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 660-665.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20210280
• Obstetric Physiology & Obstetric Disease:Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-03-30
Published:2021-12-15
Online:2021-12-30
Contact:
WANG Hua-li
E-mail:whl-dl@163.com
GAO Yue, WANG Hua-li. Research Progress on the Effect of Cervical Conization on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 48(6): 660-665.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
| [1] |
张韶凯, 赵方辉, 乔友林. 中国宫颈癌防治研究20年历程与成就[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020,41(6):809-812. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20191203-00849.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20191203-00849 |
| [2] |
Darragh TM. The LAST Project and the diagnostic bottom line[J]. Cytopathology, 2015,26(6):343-345. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12299.
doi: 10.1111/cyt.12299 pmid: 26767600 |
| [3] |
Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2020,24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525 |
| [4] |
Wise LA, Willis SK, Perkins RB, et al. A prospective study of treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fecundability[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020,223(1):96.e1-96.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.017.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.017 |
| [5] |
Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Tiitinen A, et al. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequent IVF deliveries[J]. Hum Reprod, 2008,23(10):2252-2255. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den271.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/den271 |
| [6] | Ding L, Li M, Yan L, et al. Effect of cervical conization on pregnancy outcome of in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2016,43(4):546-549. |
| [7] |
Kalliala I, Anttila A, Nieminen P, et al. Pregnancy incidence and outcome before and after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Cancer Med, 2014,3(6):1512-1516. doi: 10.1002/cam4.300.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.300 |
| [8] |
Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015,2015(9):CD008478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008478.pub2.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008478.pub2 |
| [9] |
陈兢思, 陈敦金. 宫颈锥切术对生育的影响[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2009,25(7):395-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2009.07.007.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2009.07.007 |
| [10] |
Jar-Allah T, Kärrberg C, Wiik J, et al. Abnormal cervical cytology is associated with preterm delivery: A population based study[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019,98(6):777-786. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13543.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13543 |
| [11] |
Sparić R, Papoutsis D, Kadija S, et al. Psychosexual outcomes in women of reproductive age at more than two-years from excisional cervical treatment-a cross-sectional study[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2019,40(2):128-137. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1445220.
doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1445220 |
| [12] |
Monti M, D′Aniello D, Scopelliti A, et al. Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and obstetrical outcome[J]. Minerva Obstet Gynecol, 2021,73(2):233-246. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04678-X.
doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04678-X |
| [13] |
Maina G, Ribaldone R, Danese S, et al. Obstetric outcomes in patients who have undergone excisional treatment for high-grade cervical squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2019,236:210-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.025.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.025 |
| [14] |
Miyakoshi K, Itakura A, Abe T, et al. Risk of preterm birth after the excisional surgery for cervical lesions: a propensity-score matching study in Japan[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021,34(6):845-851. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619687.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619687 |
| [15] |
van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(3):268-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x |
| [16] |
Frega A, Santomauro M, Sesti F, et al. Preterm birth after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): how cone features and microbiota could influence the pregnancy outcome[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2018,22(20):7039-7044. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201810_16176.
doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201810_16176 |
| [17] |
Zhuang H, Hong S, Zheng L, et al. Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019,39(1):74-81. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1463206.
doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1463206 |
| [18] |
Guo HJ, Guo RX, Liu YL. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2013,34(1):79-82.
pmid: 23590007 |
| [19] |
Liu Y, Qiu HF, Tang Y, et al. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2014,77(4):240-244. doi: 10.1159/000360538.
doi: 10.1159/000360538 |
| [20] |
Jiang YM, Chen CX, Li L. Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016,9:3907-3915. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108832.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108832 |
| [21] |
El-Nashar SA, Shazly SA, Hopkins MR, et al. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2017,21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287 |
| [22] |
Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2016,354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633 |
| [23] |
Biliatis I. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for preinvasive cervical lesions[J]. BMJ, 2016,354:i4027. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4027.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4027 |
| [24] |
Liverani CA, Di Giuseppe J, Clemente N, et al. Length but not transverse diameter of the excision specimen for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) is a predictor of pregnancy outcome[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2016,25(5):416-422. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000196.
doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000196 pmid: 26317385 |
| [25] | Sozen H, Namazov A, Cakir S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study[J]. J Reprod Med, 2014,59(1/2):81-86. |
| [26] |
Zebitay AG, Güngör ES, Ilhan G, et al. Cervical Conization and the Risk of Preterm Birth: A Population-Based Multicentric Trial of Turkish Cohort[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017,11(3):QC21-QC24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22996.9495.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22996.9495 |
| [27] |
Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, et al. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study[J]. BMJ, 2014,349:g6223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6223.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6223 |
| [28] |
van Velthoven K, Poppe W, Verschuere H, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017,216:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.043.
doi: S0301-2115(17)30320-2 pmid: 28822944 |
| [29] |
Conner SN, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, et al. Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013,122(6):1154-1159. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435454.31850.79.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435454.31850.79 |
| [30] |
Zhang X, Tong J, Ma X, et al. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020,99(49):e23411. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023411.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023411 |
| [31] |
Brie C, Turck M, Cheret A, et al. Case-control study of obstetrical outcomes of conisation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2016,45(2):192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.07.005.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.07.005 |
| [32] |
Champer M, Wong AM, Champer J, et al. The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer[J]. BJOG, 2018,125(3):309-315. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14631
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14631 |
| [33] |
Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, et al. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(3):258-267. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02438.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02438.x |
| [34] | 孟然, 戚红. 宫颈锥切术后妊娠结局临床分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2012,28(7):524-526. |
| [35] |
Jin G, LanLan Z, Li C, et al. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014,289(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0 |
| [36] |
Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Kalliala I, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017,11(11):CD012847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012847.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012847 |
| [37] |
Lee SM, Jun JK. Prediction and prevention of preterm birth after cervical conization[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2010,21(4):207-208. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.207.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.207 |
| [38] |
Kliemann LM, Silva M, Reinheimer M, et al. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,165(2):342-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.08.016.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.08.016 pmid: 22948133 |
| [39] |
Wang T, Jiang R, Yao Y, et al. Can prophylactic transvaginal cervical cerclage improve pregnancy outcome in patients receiving cervical conization? A meta-analysis[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2021,92(10):704-713. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0020.
doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0020 |
| [40] |
Cho GJ, Ouh YT, Kim LY, et al. Cerclage is associated with the increased risk of preterm birth in women who had cervical conization[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018,18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1765-6.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1765-6 |
| [1] | WANG Xin-yi, SUN Li-zhou, JIANG Zi-yan. A Case of Late Pregnancy Complicated with Congenital Factor Ⅺ Deficiency [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 267-269. |
| [2] | ZHENG Xiao-lin, WEI Fang. Research Progress on LPCAT1 in Gynecological Malignancies [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 273-277. |
| [3] | XIANG Xiao-ying, SUN Ya-ge, ZHANG Yun-feng, JIA Han, WANG Yue. Research Advances in the Immune Microenvironment and Immunotherapy for p53-Abnormal Endometrial Carcinoma [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 285-291. |
| [4] | WU Hua-tuo, HUANG Chun-lin, MA Yan, GE Ting, LI Li. Research Progress on the Immune Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 297-301. |
| [5] | ZHENG Le, ZHANG Xin, JIA Hai-qing. A Case Report of Pulmonary Metastasis from Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor Treated with Chemotherapy Combined with Thoracoscopic Surgery [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 302-305. |
| [6] | YIN Di-shuang, LI Nan, GUO Hong-xia. Collision Tumor Composed of High-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma and Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 311-317. |
| [7] | ZHANG Ying, SHI Meng-ru, LI Tao. A Case of Cervical Cystic Adenomyoma [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 318-321. |
| [8] | LIU Er-yu, REN Qing-yu, GAO Xiang. A Case of Recurrent Cervical Cancer with Vesicoenteric Fistula [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 322-328. |
| [9] | YANG Yan, YAN Kai, ZHOU Deng-lian, DENG Xin. Exosomes in Endometrial Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 335-340. |
| [10] | LIU Dong, GUO Jie, SONG Dian-rong. Impact and Mechanisms of the Vaginal Microbiome and Its Metabolites on HPV Infection and Cervical Lesions [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 341-346. |
| [11] | XIAO Jin-fen, ZHANG Xu-mei, LIU Yi, ZENG Qian, ZHANG Wen-ying. Impaired β-hCG Clearance Due to End-Stage Renal Disease: A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 357-360. |
| [12] | LIU Meng-ting, YAO Shun, DING Jin. Research Progress on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(2): 121-124. |
| [13] | ZHANG Chun-jie, WU Li-xian, YANG Bo, LIU Zhi-jie, ZHENG Jing. A Case of Atypical McCune-Albright Syndrome in A Prepubertal Girl [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(2): 150-152. |
| [14] | LIU Xiao-xiao, NIU Yu-qin, DING Kun, CHEN Ya-xue. The Effect of Inositol Supplementation on Blood Glucose and Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(2): 170-176. |
| [15] | XU Meng-ting, LU Di, SONG Dian-rong. Research Progress in the Tumor Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(2): 188-193. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
