
Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 336-341.doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20230956
• Obstetric Physiology & Obstetric Disease: Original Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHAO Hui, GUO Xiao-yue, ZHANG Hua, ZHAO Yang-yu(
)
Received:2023-11-26
Published:2024-06-15
Online:2024-06-25
Contact:
ZHAO Yang-yu
E-mail:zhaoyangyu@bjmu.edu.cn
SHAO Hui, GUO Xiao-yue, ZHANG Hua, ZHAO Yang-yu. Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Features in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Patients with Adnexal Torsion[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 51(3): 336-341.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
| 组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 孕次 (次) | 经产妇 | BMI (kg/m2) | 白细胞计数 (×109/L) | 中性粒细胞 比例 | 发病诱因 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有 | 无 | ||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 31(28,34) | 1(1,2) | 13(18.1) | 22.7(20.6,25.4) | 11.2(9.4,13.5) | 0.83(0.77,0.87) | 28(38.9) | 44(61.1) | ||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 30(23,39) | 0(0,2) | 114(37.5) | 23.0(20.8,25.4) | 9.2(7.2,11.4) | 0.76(0.68,0.85) | 88(28.9) | 216(71.1) | ||||||||
| χ2或Z | -0.715 | -4.657 | 9.840 | -0.588 | -4.688 | -4.538 | 2.697 | ||||||||||
| P | 0.475 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.557 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.101 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 症状 | 下腹痛时间b | 下腹痛特点b | |||||||||||||
| 下腹痛 | 恶心 | 呕吐 | 肛门坠胀 | <24 h | ≥24 h | 间断性 | 持续性 | ||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 72(100.0) | 40(55.6) | 36(50.0) | 7(9.7) | 52(72.2) | 20(27.8) | 22(30.6) | 50(69.4) | ||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 286(94.1) | 157(51.6) | 107(35.2) | 40(13.2) | 141(49.3) | 145(50.7) | 128(44.8) | 158(55.2) | ||||||||
| χ2或Z | - | 0.326 | 5.319 | 0.642 | 12.163 | 4.764 | |||||||||||
| P | 0.030a | 0.568 | 0.021 | 0.423 | 0.000 | 0.029 | |||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 孕次 (次) | 经产妇 | BMI (kg/m2) | 白细胞计数 (×109/L) | 中性粒细胞 比例 | 发病诱因 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有 | 无 | ||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 31(28,34) | 1(1,2) | 13(18.1) | 22.7(20.6,25.4) | 11.2(9.4,13.5) | 0.83(0.77,0.87) | 28(38.9) | 44(61.1) | ||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 30(23,39) | 0(0,2) | 114(37.5) | 23.0(20.8,25.4) | 9.2(7.2,11.4) | 0.76(0.68,0.85) | 88(28.9) | 216(71.1) | ||||||||
| χ2或Z | -0.715 | -4.657 | 9.840 | -0.588 | -4.688 | -4.538 | 2.697 | ||||||||||
| P | 0.475 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.557 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.101 | ||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 症状 | 下腹痛时间b | 下腹痛特点b | |||||||||||||
| 下腹痛 | 恶心 | 呕吐 | 肛门坠胀 | <24 h | ≥24 h | 间断性 | 持续性 | ||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 72(100.0) | 40(55.6) | 36(50.0) | 7(9.7) | 52(72.2) | 20(27.8) | 22(30.6) | 50(69.4) | ||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 286(94.1) | 157(51.6) | 107(35.2) | 40(13.2) | 141(49.3) | 145(50.7) | 128(44.8) | 158(55.2) | ||||||||
| χ2或Z | - | 0.326 | 5.319 | 0.642 | 12.163 | 4.764 | |||||||||||
| P | 0.030a | 0.568 | 0.021 | 0.423 | 0.000 | 0.029 | |||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 扭转方向 | 附件区包块位置 | 附件区包块 直径(cm) | 扭转度数 (度) | 手术路径 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 顺时针 | 逆时针 | 左侧 | 右侧 | 腹腔镜 | 开腹 | ||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 40(55.6) | 32(44.4) | 32(44.4) | 40(55.6) | 8.1±2.4 | 540(360,720) | 53(73.6) | 19(26.4) | ||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 155(51.0) | 149(49.0) | 117(38.5) | 187(61.5) | 9.4±3.9 | 540(360,720) | 273(89.8) | 31(10.2) | ||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 0.487 | 0.864 | -2.738 | -0.904 | 13.237 | ||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.485 | 0.353 | 0.006 | 0.366 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 手术方式 | 病理结果 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 附件切除 | 保守性手术 | 无病理 | 成熟性畸胎瘤 | 浆液性囊腺瘤 | 黏液性囊腺瘤 | 黄体囊肿 | |||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 13(18.1) | 59(81.9) | 24(33.3) | 8(11.1) | 5(6.9) | 0 | 21(29.2) | |||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 93(30.6) | 211(69.4) | 18(5.9) | 92(30.3) | 48(15.8) | 29(9.5) | 32(10.5) | |||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 4.519 | 44.085 | 10.937 | 3.761 | - | 16.704 | |||||||||||||||
| P | 0.034 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.002a | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 病理结果 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 系膜囊肿 | 其他良性肿瘤 | 子宫内膜异位囊肿 | 输卵管积水 | 恶性肿瘤 | 卵泡膜细胞瘤 | 卵巢组织 | |||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 6(8.3) | 4(5.6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1(1.4) | 3(4.2) | |||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 10(3.3) | 31(10.2) | 14(4.6) | 9(3.0) | 13(4.3) | 4(1.3) | 4(1.3) | |||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 3.635 | 0.987 | - | - | - | 0.000 | 1.264 | ||||||||||||||
| P | 0.057 | 0.321b | 0.048a | 0.144a | 0.060a | 1.000b | 0.261b | ||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 扭转方向 | 附件区包块位置 | 附件区包块 直径(cm) | 扭转度数 (度) | 手术路径 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 顺时针 | 逆时针 | 左侧 | 右侧 | 腹腔镜 | 开腹 | ||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 40(55.6) | 32(44.4) | 32(44.4) | 40(55.6) | 8.1±2.4 | 540(360,720) | 53(73.6) | 19(26.4) | ||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 155(51.0) | 149(49.0) | 117(38.5) | 187(61.5) | 9.4±3.9 | 540(360,720) | 273(89.8) | 31(10.2) | ||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 0.487 | 0.864 | -2.738 | -0.904 | 13.237 | ||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.485 | 0.353 | 0.006 | 0.366 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 手术方式 | 病理结果 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 附件切除 | 保守性手术 | 无病理 | 成熟性畸胎瘤 | 浆液性囊腺瘤 | 黏液性囊腺瘤 | 黄体囊肿 | |||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 13(18.1) | 59(81.9) | 24(33.3) | 8(11.1) | 5(6.9) | 0 | 21(29.2) | |||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 93(30.6) | 211(69.4) | 18(5.9) | 92(30.3) | 48(15.8) | 29(9.5) | 32(10.5) | |||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 4.519 | 44.085 | 10.937 | 3.761 | - | 16.704 | |||||||||||||||
| P | 0.034 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.002a | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 病理结果 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 系膜囊肿 | 其他良性肿瘤 | 子宫内膜异位囊肿 | 输卵管积水 | 恶性肿瘤 | 卵泡膜细胞瘤 | 卵巢组织 | |||||||||||||||
| 妊娠期AT组 | 72 | 6(8.3) | 4(5.6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1(1.4) | 3(4.2) | |||||||||||||
| 非妊娠期AT组 | 304 | 10(3.3) | 31(10.2) | 14(4.6) | 9(3.0) | 13(4.3) | 4(1.3) | 4(1.3) | |||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 3.635 | 0.987 | - | - | - | 0.000 | 1.264 | ||||||||||||||
| P | 0.057 | 0.321b | 0.048a | 0.144a | 0.060a | 1.000b | 0.261b | ||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 孕次 (次) | 产次 (次) | BMI (kg/m2) | 白细胞计数 (×109/L) | 中性粒细胞 比例 | 妊娠方式 | 发病诱因 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 自然妊娠 | ART助孕 | 有 | 无 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 30.7±4.7 | 1.5±0.7 | 0.1±0.3 | 22.0(20.2,23.9) | 11.9±3.4 | 0.82±0.08 | 18(38.3) | 29(61.7) | 20(42.6) | 27(57.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 31.4±4.0 | 1.6±0.8 | 0.3±0.5 | 24.9(21.4,27.2) | 11.4±3.7 | 0.81±0.07 | 18(72.0) | 7(28.0) | 8(32.0) | 17(68.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | -0.570 | -0.369 | -2.294 | -2.555 | -0.004 | 0.572 | 7.414 | 0.765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.570 | 0.713 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.997 | 0.569 | 0.006 | 0.382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 症状 | 下腹痛时间 | 下腹痛特点 | 手术路径 | 手术方式 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 恶心 | 呕吐 | 肛门坠胀 | <24 h | ≥24 h | 间断性 | 持续性 | 腹腔镜 | 开腹 | 附件切除 | 保守性手术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 30(63.8) | 26(55.3) | 5(10.6) | 34(72.3) | 13(27.7) | 11(23.4) | 36(76.6) | 47(100.0) | 0 | 3(6.4) | 44(93.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 10(40.0) | 10(40.0) | 2(8.0) | 18(72.0) | 7(28.0) | 11(44.0) | 14(56.0) | 6(24.0) | 19(76.0) | 10(40.0) | 15(60.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 3.753 | 1.532 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 3.262 | - | 12.465 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.053 | 0.216 | 1.000b | 0.976 | 0.071 | <0.001a | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 附件区包块 直径(cm) | 扭转度数 (度) | 附件区包块位置 | 扭转方向 | 病理性囊肿 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 左侧 | 右侧 | 顺时针 | 逆时针 | 是 | 否 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 8.7±2.4 | 360(360,720) | 24(51.1) | 23(48.9) | 27(57.4) | 20(42.6) | 8(21.3) | 39(78.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 7.1±2.0 | 720(630,1 080) | 8(32.0) | 17(68.0) | 13(52.0) | 12(48.0) | 16(68.0) | 9(32.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 2.801 | -4.181 | 2.402 | 0.196 | 16.208 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.007 | <0.001 | 0.121 | 0.658 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 年龄 (岁) | 孕次 (次) | 产次 (次) | BMI (kg/m2) | 白细胞计数 (×109/L) | 中性粒细胞 比例 | 妊娠方式 | 发病诱因 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 自然妊娠 | ART助孕 | 有 | 无 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 30.7±4.7 | 1.5±0.7 | 0.1±0.3 | 22.0(20.2,23.9) | 11.9±3.4 | 0.82±0.08 | 18(38.3) | 29(61.7) | 20(42.6) | 27(57.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 31.4±4.0 | 1.6±0.8 | 0.3±0.5 | 24.9(21.4,27.2) | 11.4±3.7 | 0.81±0.07 | 18(72.0) | 7(28.0) | 8(32.0) | 17(68.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | -0.570 | -0.369 | -2.294 | -2.555 | -0.004 | 0.572 | 7.414 | 0.765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.570 | 0.713 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.997 | 0.569 | 0.006 | 0.382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 症状 | 下腹痛时间 | 下腹痛特点 | 手术路径 | 手术方式 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 恶心 | 呕吐 | 肛门坠胀 | <24 h | ≥24 h | 间断性 | 持续性 | 腹腔镜 | 开腹 | 附件切除 | 保守性手术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 30(63.8) | 26(55.3) | 5(10.6) | 34(72.3) | 13(27.7) | 11(23.4) | 36(76.6) | 47(100.0) | 0 | 3(6.4) | 44(93.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 10(40.0) | 10(40.0) | 2(8.0) | 18(72.0) | 7(28.0) | 11(44.0) | 14(56.0) | 6(24.0) | 19(76.0) | 10(40.0) | 15(60.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 3.753 | 1.532 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 3.262 | - | 12.465 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.053 | 0.216 | 1.000b | 0.976 | 0.071 | <0.001a | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 组别 | n | 附件区包块 直径(cm) | 扭转度数 (度) | 附件区包块位置 | 扭转方向 | 病理性囊肿 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 左侧 | 右侧 | 顺时针 | 逆时针 | 是 | 否 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠早期AT组 | 47 | 8.7±2.4 | 360(360,720) | 24(51.1) | 23(48.9) | 27(57.4) | 20(42.6) | 8(21.3) | 39(78.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 妊娠中晚期AT组 | 25 | 7.1±2.0 | 720(630,1 080) | 8(32.0) | 17(68.0) | 13(52.0) | 12(48.0) | 16(68.0) | 9(32.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| t或χ2或Z | 2.801 | -4.181 | 2.402 | 0.196 | 16.208 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 0.007 | <0.001 | 0.121 | 0.658 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [1] | Adnexal Torsion in Adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No, 783[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 134(2):e56-e63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003373. |
| [2] | Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 202(6):536.e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.028. |
| [3] | Adeyemi-Fowode O, McCracken KA, Todd NJ. Adnexal Torsion[J]. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2018, 31(4):333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.03.010. |
| [4] | Bassi A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Abenhaim HA. Effect of Pregnancy on the Management and Outcomes of Ovarian Torsion: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(7):1260-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.022. |
| [5] | Spitzer D, Wirleitner B, Steiner H, et al. Adnexal Torsion in Pregnancy after Assisted Reproduction-Case Study and Review of the Literature[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2012, 72(8):716-720. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315186. |
| [6] | Misiriyyah N, Qurban K, Beevi A, et al. Adnexal Torsion Associated With Recurrent Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Case Report[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(3):e36344. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36344. |
| [7] | Narayansingh G, Hoh J. The eventual successful management of ovarian torsion in a hyperstimulated ovary following in vitro fertilization: A case report[J]. Case Rep Womens Health, 2020,26:e00166. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00166. |
| [8] | Seo SK, Lee JB, Lee I, et al. Clinical and pathological comparisons of adnexal torsion between pregnant and non-pregnant women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(9):1899-1905. doi: 10.1111/jog.14057. |
| [9] |
Young R, Cork K. Intermittent Ovarian Torsion in Pregnancy[J]. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med, 2017, 1(2):108-110. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2016.12.32932.
pmid: 29849404 |
| [10] | Wu WF, Wang ZH, Xiu YL, et al. Characteristics and surgical invervention of ovarian torsion in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2020, 99(24):e20627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020627. |
| [11] | Didar H, Najafiarab H, Keyvanfar A, et al. Adnexal torsion in pregnancy: A systematic review of case reports and case series[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2023, 65:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.026. |
| [12] | Chang-Patel EJ, Palacios-Helgeson LK, Gould CH. Adnexal torsion: a review of diagnosis and management strategies[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 34(4):196-203. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000787. |
| [13] | 王永学, 尹婕, 邓姗. 妊娠期附件扭转临床分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2021, 30(6):706-709. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2021.06.002. |
| [14] | Ginath S, Shalev A, Keidar R, et al. Differences between adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(6):708-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.07.007. |
| [15] | Daykan Y, Bogin R, Sharvit M, et al. Adnexal Torsion during Pregnancy: Outcomes after Surgical Intervention-A Retrospective Case-Control Study[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26(1):117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.04.015. |
| [16] |
Zou G, Xu P, Zhu L, et al. Comparison of subsequent pregnancy outcomes after surgery for adnexal masses performed in the first and second trimester of pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2020, 148(3):305-309. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13065.
pmid: 31758814 |
| [17] | 中国医师协会微无创医学专业委员会妇科肿瘤(学组)专业委员会,中国优生科学协会女性生殖道疾病诊治分会. 女性附件扭转治疗的中国专家共识(2020年版)[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2020, 36(11):822-826. |
| [18] | Meyer R, Meller N, Komem DA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopy for suspected adnexal torsion during pregnancy[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25):6396-6402. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1914574. |
| [19] | Ekici H, Okmen F, Imamoglu M, et al. Perioperative Outcomes in Pregnant Women Who Underwent Surgery for Adnexal Torsion[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2022, 44(4):336-342. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742403. |
| [20] | Dizon AM, Carey ET. Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in the pregnant patient: considerations, techniques, and postoperative management per trimester[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 30(4):267-271. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000469. |
| [21] | ACOG Committee Opinion No. 775: Nonobstetric Surgery During Pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133(4):e285-e286. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003174. |
| [22] | 郭晓玥, 邵珲, 原鹏波, 等. 妊娠期不同孕周附件扭转的诊治及结局分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(27):2159-2163. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201126-03197. |
| [23] |
Yaakov O, Ashwal E, Gemer O, et al. Acute Adnexal Torsion: Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Associated with a Better Outcome?[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2022, 87(2):100-104. doi: 10.1159/000522501.
pmid: 35139515 |
| [24] |
Novoa M, Friedman J, Mayrink M. Ovarian torsion: can we save the ovary?[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 304(1):191-195. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06008-8.
pmid: 33638663 |
| [25] | Hao J, Sun Z. Clinical characteristics of adnexal torsion and role of ovarian sparing surgery: a clinical retrospective analysis[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2024, 95(2):84-91. doi: 10.5603/gpl.95324. |
| [1] | LOU Ying-ya, GAO Juan-mei, ZHAI Hong-bo. Research Progress on the Application of Corticosteroids in Late Preterm Twin Pregnancies [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 249-254. |
| [2] | HE Zeng-tiantian, YU Jian-nan, GAO Zhu-wei, LIU Yu, ZHANG Qian, WU Xiao-ke. TPOAb Positivity during Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Independent Risk, Synergistic Mechanisms with SCH, and Intervention Strategies [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 255-260. |
| [3] | ZHAO Wei-li, HU Li-yan. Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms to Build A Prediction Model for Neonatal Hypoglycemia [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 261-266. |
| [4] | WANG Xin-yi, SUN Li-zhou, JIANG Zi-yan. A Case of Late Pregnancy Complicated with Congenital Factor Ⅺ Deficiency [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 267-269. |
| [5] | ZHANG Ying, SHI Meng-ru, LI Tao. A Case of Cervical Cystic Adenomyoma [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 318-321. |
| [6] | XIAO Jin-fen, ZHANG Xu-mei, LIU Yi, ZENG Qian, ZHANG Wen-ying. Impaired β-hCG Clearance Due to End-Stage Renal Disease: A Case Report [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(3): 357-360. |
| [7] | LIU Xiao-xiao, NIU Yu-qin, DING Kun, CHEN Ya-xue. The Effect of Inositol Supplementation on Blood Glucose and Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(2): 170-176. |
| [8] | ZHANG Huan-qin, YANG Wei-hua, GUO Yao-shan, LIANG Xiao-ju. Umbilical Vascular Thrombosis in Parturients: A Clinical Analysis of Six Cases [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026, 53(1): 108-112. |
| [9] | MA Yue, LIU Qian-qian, WU Xue-li, LI Hong-li, LIU Chang. A Case of Rudimentary Uterine Horn Malformation with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 634-637. |
| [10] | WANG Jun, SUN Xiao-tong, PU Rui-yang, ZHANG Lei-lei. Research Progress on Protein Lactylation Modification in Placental Hypoxia and Pregnancy Complications [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 643-648. |
| [11] | WANG Xin-yi, ZHU Cai-xia. Effects of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells on Normal Pregnancy and Pathological Pregnancy [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 649-653. |
| [12] | MA Xiao-tong, XUE Feng-xia. The Changes in the Reproductive Tract Microbiota during Female Pregnancy and Their Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 654-659. |
| [13] | JIN Hua, REN Yu, ZHAO Jing. The Guiding Value of Ultrasonic Monitoring Parameters in the First Stage of Labor for Maternal Delivery Modes [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 668-671. |
| [14] | LI Qiong, LI Hui-dong, ZHANG Yun-shan. A Case of Pelvic Venous Plexus Thrombosis Complicating Early Pregnancy [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 672-675. |
| [15] | WANG Hong-mei, YANG Qian-ying, MENG Qing-ju, LIU Yan-li. A Case of Uterine Rupture in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy after Cornual Uterine Surgery [J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 52(6): 676-679. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||