高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗及转归预测因素的研究进展

doi:10.12280/gjfckx.20200855

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究已证实宫颈上皮内瘤变是宫颈癌的癌前病变,2014年世界卫生组织（WHO）改变了既往宫颈上皮内瘤变的3级分类法,将其分为低级别鳞状上皮内病变和高级别鳞状上皮内病变两类,其中宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变具有癌变潜能,极易进展,使我国女性的生理及心理健康受到严重威胁。目前,高级别鳞状上皮内病变的常用治疗方式为宫颈冷刀锥切术和环形电切术,一般疗效较好,但仍可能发生术中及术后出血、切口感染、宫颈狭窄、子宫内膜异位症和肠道损伤等并发症。相关研究显示,人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）分型、切缘阳性以及绝经状态与术后病变残留、复发、进展等风险密切相关,对宫颈锥切术后不良结局的预测有助于加强对此类患者的集中管理,提前预防并及时阻断病变进展途径,降低宫颈癌的患病率和死亡率。目前,预防性HPV疫苗的安全性和有效性已得到充分肯定,对减少HPV感染、预防术后疾病复发疗效显著,但宫颈已有病变者术后接种疫苗的作用效果尚待进一步探究。

关键词: 宫颈鳞状上皮内病变, 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变, 冷刀锥切术, 冷冻外科手术, 环形电切术, 电外科手术, 治疗, 预后

Abstract:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia has been confirmed as a precancerous lesion of cervical cancer. In 2014, WHO changed the three-level classification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, dividing it into low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia. Among them, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix have the potential to become cancerous and are prone to progress, which seriously threaten the physical and mental health of Chinese women. At present, the common surgical methods of cervical cold knife conization and circular electric resection are used to treat high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Generally, good treatment results can be achieved, but intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and incision infection may still occur. Cervical stenosis, endometriosis, intestinal injury and other complications may also occur. Relevant studies have shown that human papillomavirus (HPV) classification, positive resection margins, and menopausal status are closely related to the risks of postoperative lesions, recurrence, and progression, which can help predict adverse outcomes after cervical conization, strengthen the centralized management of such patients, prevent and block the path of disease progression in advance, and reduce the prevalence and mortality of cervical cancer. At present, the safety and effectiveness of the preventive HPV vaccine have been fully affirmed, and it has significant effects on reducing HPV infection and preventing postoperative disease recurrence. However, the effect of postoperative vaccination in patients with cervical lesions needs to be explored.

Key words: Squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Cold knife conization, Cryosurgery, Circular resection, Electrosurgery, Therapy, Prognosis

刘明月, 韩旭. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗及转归预测因素的研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 337-342.

LIU Ming-yue, HAN Xu. Research Progress on Treatment and Prognosis Prediction of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 48(3): 337-342.

参考文献 35

[1]	Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018,68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
[2]	Zhang X, Xu Y, Meng T, et al. Analysis of factors affecting the prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020,20(2):1810-1816. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11711. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11711
[3]	Basu P, Taghavi K, Hu SY, et al. Management of cervical premalignant lesions[J]. Curr Probl Cancer, 2018,42(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010
[4]	Ayhan A, Tuncer HA, Reyhan NH, et al. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016,201:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.021. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.021
[5]	Papalia N, Rohla A, Tang S, et al. Defining the short-term disease recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2020,20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00901-1. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00901-1
[6]	Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, et al. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006,103(2):604-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.003. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.003 pmid: 16750257
[7]	Yamamoto R, Sekiyama K, Higuchi T, et al. Value and limitation of conization as a diagnostic procedure for cervical neoplasm[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019,45(12):2419-2424. doi: 10.1111/jog.14118. doi: 10.1111/jog.14118
[8]	李著艳, 黄卉, 马亚琳, 等. 传统冷刀锥切术与宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变对于近远期效果的影响分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2018,27(6):43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.06.014. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.06.014
[9]	Gungorduk K, Ozdemir A, Sahin O. Optimal timing of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure according to different phases of the menstrual cycle[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2021,50(5):101888. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101888. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101888
[10]	Cho A, Park S, Park S, et al. Hemoperitoneum: a complication of loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2019,62(2):138-141. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.138. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.138
[11]	Giannella L, D′Ippolito G. Cervical ripening balloon: An off-label but effective use to manage massive hemorrhage during outpatient cervical conization[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019,147(1):126-127. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12910. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12910 pmid: 31301236
[12]	Kim SH, Srinivas SK, Rubin SC, et al. Delayed hemorrhage after cervical conization unmasking severe factor XI deficiency[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,104(5 Pt 2):1189-1192. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000125882.72624.2c. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000125882.72624.2c
[13]	Wang X, Li L, Bi Y, et al. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions[J]. Sci Rep, 2019,9(1):19114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55786-4. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55786-4
[14]	Dane C, Dane B, Cetin A, et al. Haemostasis after cold-knife conisation: a randomised prospective trial comparing cerclage suture versus electro-cauterization[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008,48(3):343-347. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00853.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00853.x pmid: 18532969
[15]	Kietpeerakool C, Chumworathayi B, Thinkhamrop J, et al. Antibiotics for infection prevention after excision of the cervical transformation zone[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017,1(1):CD009957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009957.pub2. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009957.pub2
[16]	Suh-Burgmann EJ, Whall-Strojwas D, Chang Y, et al. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2000,96(5 Pt 1):657-660. pmid: 11042296
[17]	徐燕, 朱丽芳, 王丹, 等. 宫颈病变治疗方案对妇女妊娠结局及分娩方式影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020,28(7):1108-1113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2020.07.036. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2020.07.036
[18]	Lin J, Meng Y, Chen Y, et al. A new approach to prevent cervical stenosis in postmenopausal women after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1):8512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65170-2. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65170-2
[19]	Takahashi N, Koga K, Arakawa I, et al. Development of endometrioma after cervical conization[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2018,34(4):341-344. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1393660. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1393660
[20]	Aubrey C, Sabourin J. Vesicovaginal Fistula Following Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Case Report[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2018,40(10):1333-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018. 01.023. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018. 01.023
[21]	Sand FL, Frederiksen K, Munk C, et al. Long-term risk of cervical cancer following conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3-A Danish nationwide cohort study[J]. Int J Cancer, 2018,142(9):1759-1766. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31202. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31202
[22]	Kalliala I, Athanasiou A, Veroniki AA, et al. Incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and other malignancies after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature[J]. Ann Oncol, 2020,31(2):213-227. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.11.004. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.11.004
[23]	Mobini Kesheh M, Keyvani H. The Prevalence of HPV Genotypes in Iranian Population: An Update[J]. Iran J Pathol, 2019,14(3):197-205. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2019.90356.1861. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21604. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21604
[24]	Bruno MT, Cassaro N, Garofalo S, et al. HPV16 persistent infection and recurrent disease after LEEP[J]. Virol J, 2019,16(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1252-3. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1252-3
[25]	Jain S, Tseng CJ, Horng SG, et al. Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001,82(1):177-180. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6241. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6241 pmid: 11426982
[26]	Heymans J, Benoy IH, Poppe W, et al. Type-specific HPV geno-typing improves detection of recurrent high-grade cervical neoplasia after conisation[J]. Int J Cancer, 2011,129(4):903-909. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25745. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25745 pmid: 21064091
[27]	Ouh YT, Cho HW, Kim SM, et al. Risk factors for type-specific persistence of high-risk human papillomavirus and residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after surgical treatment[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2020,63(5):631-642. doi: 10.5468/ogs.20049. doi: 10.5468/ogs.20049
[28]	Bruhn LV, Andersen SJ, Hariri J. HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2018,97(6):758-765. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13325. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13325
[29]	余艳琴, 郝金奇, 徐慧芳, 等. 宫颈癌综合预防和控制的应用和前景[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2020,42(4):535-539. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11370. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.11370
[30]	Garland SM, Paavonen J, Jaisamrarn U, et al. Prior human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccination prevents recurrent high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after definitive surgical therapy: Post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016,139(12):2812-2826. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30391. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30391
[31]	Sand FL, Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, et al. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse after conization in relation to HPV vaccination status[J]. Int J Cancer, 2020,147(3):641-647. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32752. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32752
[32]	Chen L, Liu L, Tao X, et al. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2019,23(1):24-27. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000444. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000444
[33]	Shaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, et al. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia[J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2014,33(1):83-88. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158
[34]	Teng P, Hao M. A population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Cancer Med, 2020,9(5):1890-1902. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2845. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2845
[35]	Chen JY, Wang ZL, Wang ZY, et al. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization[J]. Medicine (Abingdon), 2018,97(41):e12792. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012792. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012792